Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I highly doubt that is a bug.
I highly suspect you need to get out more.

It is, the area he is referring to should be a gradient shadow. His is a solid block of colour. So, bug.

Get out more than someone who looks for posts to pick up on (incorrectly), and criticise? Please, he's not the one who needs to get out more :rolleyes:.

AppleMatt
 
Some people just don't like change.
When it is change for the sake of change, I don't see the point. The new home screen isn't improved. Instead of the categories (Movies, TV Shows, Music, Podcasts, etc) being listed in a left column, they've been moved to a horizontal navigation bar. That is pretty much it. All the options in the categories are unchanged. Moving stuff around doesn't offer any improvement or make things drastically easier. It's just change for the sake of change.
 
It is, the area he is referring to should be a gradient shadow. His is a solid block of colour. So, bug.

Get out more than someone who looks for posts to pick up on (incorrectly), and criticise? Please, he's not the one who needs to get out more :rolleyes:.

AppleMatt

I would be curious to know what hardware he's running on. It's possible it is related to that.
 
When it is change for the sake of change, I don't see the point. The new home screen isn't improved. Instead of the categories (Movies, TV Shows, Music, Podcasts, etc) being listed in a left column, they've been moved to a horizontal navigation bar. That is pretty much it. All the options in the categories are unchanged. Moving stuff around doesn't offer any improvement or make things drastically easier. It's just change for the sake of change.

This change does allow for the addition of Navigation sub-menus though.
 
It is, the area he is referring to should be a gradient shadow. His is a solid block of colour. So, bug.

Get out more than someone who looks for posts to pick up on (incorrectly), and criticise? Please, he's not the one who needs to get out more :rolleyes:.

AppleMatt

Well, I guess I've been told. Oh, SNAP.

I don't know how I'll ever carry on in this World. It starts with not being able to pick up buggy gradient shadows, and the next thing you know you're standing outside a liquor store begging for a shot of Wild Turkey.

Let's see.......who needs to get out more.....

Guy number one who complains about a border around his albums.
Guy number two who points out "who cares"
Guy number three who calls guy number two out over "a buggy gradient shadow"

Perhaps I have been spending too much time having fun with my friends and playing with my kids in the park to notice a buggy gradient shadow when I see one. Clearly I need to get out more......

/this is fun.
 
Hmmmm, interesting, but I doubt it would happen that way. Even if that were the case, there is little reason why the Apple TV couldn't stay connected to the multiple libraries. Personally, I think it is just broken in 3.0..
Perhaps it was intentional to make it easier to pick up changes in a synced library; if that is the case there should be an option to turn it off (although options are very non-Apple). With the previous version if I made a change to my synced library (such as adding a movie) the only way to pick that up was to turn the :apple:TV off and back on, or to otherwise force a reload of the library somehow. At lease now if you add a movie all you ahve to do is go out of the selection and back in again.
 
Anyone else got this iTunes 9.0.2 Dark background bug? When you select 'Dark' there is a nasty faint black border around all the artwork, apps and movie thumbnails in Grid view.

Pic here: http://twitpic.com/nj1pt

I am seeing the same solid border. I thought it looked odd but was glad to get back the dark background. If this is a bug can somebody post a screenshot of what it should look like? Thanks
 

WARNING: ATVFlash is a paid distribution of open-source software. There is nothing in ATVFlash that you can't get yourself. For the most part, ATVUSBCreator (http://code.google.com/p/atvusb-creator/) is a free, works-every-time equivalent.

Save your $50.

The only reason to buy ATVFlash is if the command line frightens you severely (can't cut/paste an install command from a web browser into a Terminal window) AND you want all of the various applications ATVFlash installs for you. On ATV 2.4, the ATVUSBCreator would put a tool for downloading and installing all the popular hack apps (Boxee and XMBC, but also Nito, etc), which even avoided copy/paste from a web browser to the Terminal window.

Again, seriously: save your $50. There's no reason to spend that kind of money just for an open-source software installer.
 
Is this the dark background around albums in grid mode that turned white in 9.0? How do you set it for dark?

You have to set it to dark, mine was default to the standard white (when I upgraded my iTunes, not fresh install).

Go to Preferences and then in the middle (on the right half side) is the Grid view drop-down list. It was in the logical place but it took me a while to spot it.
 
You have to set it to dark, mine was default to the standard white (when I upgraded my iTunes, not fresh install).

Go to Preferences and then in the middle (on the right half side) is the Grid view drop-down list.
OK, thanks, I had already looked but somehow missed it. Changing it to dark give me the same solid black around the albums with a dark gray background - looks kinda weird.
 
OK, thanks, I had already looked but somehow missed it. Changing it to dark give me the same solid black around the albums with a dark gray background - looks kinda weird.

Hmm I didn't see the black border around the albums, but on a hunch I switched from 32-bit true color to 16-bit high color (on my Windows PC) and saw what everyone is talking about. Are you guys able to switch to 32-bit color?

32-bit (True Color)
4059020556_0b0986c3ce_o.jpg


vs. 16-bit (High Color)
4058278199_b2ec102c9e_o.jpg
 
I would sure like to know where all you people are finding these media players that have Blu-ray and/or DVR functionality and cost less than the Apple TV ($229). Or similarly, all these devices that show that the Apple TV is overpriced and out of date.

DVR for under $229? Only if you buy into a one or more year subscription service. Besides that, IMO DVR functionality is better provided through a cable or satellite TV box (for a relatively small monthly fee).

Blu-ray? Well, yes, on the PlayStation 3 but that is price subsidized by Sony.

Full HD media players for $229 or less? Only if you give up things like built-in WiFi, networking, hard disk drive, or the ability to serve your local or pre-owned content.

Also, let me put to rest the argument that Apple needs to support 1080p content because everyone wants to rip their Blu-ray discs. Tell that to your momma! ;) Not an insult, I mean do you really expect the average consumer to do that?

Once again I feel that I need to bring some facts to the table. Try the cost of these media players (prices are quotes from the manufacturer, but in some cases you can find slightly lower pricing on the internet):

Western Digital TV - $130 (no built-in networking, wireless, or hard disk drive).
Western Digital TV Live - $150 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour A-110 - $215 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour C-200 - $299 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Roku HD - $100, no 802.11n and no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video .
Roku HD XR - $130, no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video.

And finally (because I know someone is going to "trot these out"):
PlayStation 3 - Apple isn't going to lose money on each Apple TV sale, price subsidized by Sony.
XBox 360 - price subsidized by Microsoft.

Note that the Roku media players are actually a pretty good deal, but they are for payed, internet-streamed content only and thus you can't use them to watch or listen to your self-generated or self-produced content.

Links:
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=572
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=735
http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php?pluginoption=catalog
http://www.roku.com/roku-products
 
When it is change for the sake of change, I don't see the point. The new home screen isn't improved. Instead of the categories (Movies, TV Shows, Music, Podcasts, etc) being listed in a left column, they've been moved to a horizontal navigation bar. That is pretty much it. All the options in the categories are unchanged. Moving stuff around doesn't offer any improvement or make things drastically easier. It's just change for the sake of change.

I do see your point, but I think in this case there is a small benefit: Previously you had to click the left-hand menu item (either center or right) to access the sub-options. Now you don't, they’re already selected. Plus widescreen TV's are wider than they are tall, so a horizontal navigation system does make more sense (to me) than a traditional vertical one.

That said, once you've got past the photo upgrades and internet radio (both of which I like) there is little new to this update - I did want more.


Perhaps I have been spending too much time having fun with my friends and playing with my kids in the park to notice a buggy gradient shadow when I see one. Clearly I need to get out more......

/this is fun.

All that time spent with others yet you managed to reply to my post within minutes. Well done.

Just because you don't care about it, doesn't mean it's not worth caring about. If you don't care about such things, I question why you're on a site like this chatting in a discussion about a software point release - that just doesn't add up?! I don't care about the answer, before you tell me, but I would like to suggest applying for a job at Apple as 'bug manager'; you know your stuff (oh no, wait, you got it wrong didn't you). I imagine if these sort of bugs affect you the rationale would change.

Just to be clear - you are, by the way, my hero. You're far to cool for me, what with all your friends and family and just don't give a crap attitude. I want to be like you.

AppleMatt
 
*snip*

And finally (because I know someone is going to "trot these out"):
PlayStation 3 - Apple isn't going to lose money on each Apple TV sale, price subsidized by Sony.
XBox 360 - price subsidized by Microsoft.

That's your only argument against the PS3/Xbox? I can't even call that a rebuttal. Do you have anything against the actual units to say?

LOL - Epic fail in your post.
 
I would sure like to know where all you people are finding these media players that have Blu-ray and/or DVR functionality and cost less than the Apple TV ($229). Or similarly, all these devices that show that the Apple TV is overpriced and out of date.

---

Western Digital TV - $130 (no built-in networking, wireless, or hard disk drive).
Western Digital TV Live - $150 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour A-110 - $215 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour C-200 - $299 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Roku HD - $100, no 802.11n and no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video .
Roku HD XR - $130, no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video.

And finally (because I know someone is going to "trot these out"):
PlayStation 3 - Apple isn't going to lose money on each Apple TV sale, price subsidized by Sony.
XBox 360 - price subsidized by Microsoft.

You forgot:
Original xbox +xbmc - <$10 (no built-in wireless, struggles with 720p+)
Any x86 machine +xbmc - $anything (none)

Neither are working out of the box, but you cant get xbmc on a commercial machine afaik - and if you want the best media streaming device, chances are you handle doing 5 minutes of googling and want the best possible experience.
 
You forgot:
Original xbox +xbmc - <$10 (no built-in wireless, struggles with 720p+)
Any x86 machine +xbmc - $anything (none)

Neither are working out of the box, but you cant get xbmc on a commercial machine afaik - and if you want the best media streaming device, chances are you handle doing 5 minutes of googling and want the best possible experience.

I personally never found xbmc or boxee to be great solutions. Add to this the complexity of installing and upgrading it. In my opinion, I tried it and got sick being a technician. I wan to spend my hours enjoying the product. I do enjoy my Apple TV even with all the shortcoming it has.

This update is going in the right direction. My only dissatisfaction would be the frecuency of the updates. But, unlike most people here, I bought an iPod for my TV (aka Apple TV) and that's what I got. I didn't buy a DVR, Netflix streaming capable or anything else. If you don't like Apple TV, please spend hours building your own HTPC. I did spent years and after many frsutrations, I can say I rather enjoy the product than be a constant technician.
 
How is the new interface better than the old one? It looks terrible to me. So much wasted space at the bottom. Very un-Apple like. I'll wait to see what those who actually download it think, but my initial impression from the sample screen shots is that I might stick with the existing software, as the existing interface looks so much better.

I agree still no regret selling my last one off, compared to what is offered in XBMC the interface is so archiac, so they have a new main menu screen and an ugle one to boot.
 
I personally never found xbmc or boxee to be great solutions. Add to this the complexity of installing and upgrading it. In my opinion, I tried it and got sick being a technician. I wan to spend my hours enjoying the product.

---

If you don't like Apple TV, please spend hours building your own HTPC. I did spent years and after many frsutrations, I can say I rather enjoy the product than be a constant technician.

xbmc is 'relatively' new to being portable on os' - hence why boxee and plex are also quite new, so I'm not sure how you've spent years being a technician. Also, despite development being excitingly quick for years and years on all its platforms, you've always been able to get a stable version, install and 'enjoy your media for hours' - which is strangely the point in the project, and what many other people do.

My main issues atv are all down to it's limitations - it's basically just an itunes extender and doesn't support high bitrate media. If the price and hardware were right I'd pick some up, and irrelevent of what apple had done with their software, chances are I'd be putting something else on it. I don't care about the masses, what's feasible for making a profit out of average joe - like you said, I just want to enjoy my media...in the best way possible - also my setup has the willy waving 'wow, I want that' factor 100% of the time for people that visit, the atv to me is just a poor hardware/more limited/slightly improved looking gui take on the many cheap popcorn hour type devices.
With all these cheap ION machines available now, there's loads of 'standardized' hardware, for cheap, no building (half the fun sometimes?) - Which is good, because I honestly don't think there's any where near as good solutions to any media centre installs as some of the OSS projects.
 
fpnc said:
...And finally (because I know someone is going to "trot these out"):
PlayStation 3 - Apple isn't going to lose money on each Apple TV sale, price subsidized by Sony.
XBox 360 - price subsidized by Microsoft...
That's your only argument against the PS3/Xbox? LOL! I can't even call that a rebuttal.

Epic fail in your post.
I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. ;) I wasn't trying to compare products per se, just offering counterpoints on why the Apple TV really isn't overpriced or under featured. Do you really think Apple could sell the Apple TV at a loss? If that's the case you need to go back to business 101. The XBox 360 and PlayStation 3 are priced as they are because of the gaming market and price subsidizes provided either by or to Microsoft and Sony.

In any case, I'll freely admit that the XBox 360 and PlayStation 3 are decent options. But you can't use them to argue that Apple is somehow ripping the consumer off in price or features. There have been a lot of posts from people who insist that Apple either needs to lower the price on the Apple TV or add more features for the same price (i.e. it's overpriced and out of date). However, those claims aren't supported by the offerings from the major competition and in my previous posts I've provided the data to show why that is so from a business and market perspective.

Could Apple lower the price a little and still break even? Probably, but that would hardly be good business sense. Some people apparently don't know that the Apple TV is by far the lowest margin product that Apple currently offers.

Could Apple add significant new features to the Apple TV and hold the current prices? Probably not.

Could Apple increase the price of the Apple TV? Sure and they may if they add more capabilities.

How about a few new features (new hardware design with some mild performance tweaks) at or near the current price? Most likely this will happen within the next year.

Would the addition of significant new features with a concomitant increase in price help the Apple TV? Debatable I think. Particularly if you consider the limitation in the current internet-based, media-streaming market. See the following:

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/8732115/

What I'm trying to do is bring some factual data to this debate on what Apple should or could do with the Apple TV. It really does no good to create a wish list of features with little thought to the business practicality of such features and "upgrades." Simply wishing it so doesn't justify it or make it so.
 
Hmm I didn't see the black border around the albums, but on a hunch I switched from 32-bit true color to 16-bit high color (on my Windows PC) and saw what everyone is talking about. Are you guys able to switch to 32-bit color?

32-bit (True Color)
4059020556_0b0986c3ce_o.jpg


vs. 16-bit (High Color)
4058278199_b2ec102c9e_o.jpg

Well spotted. The Macbook Air display doesn't support true 32bit due to the panel. It shows the dark background perfectly fine on a Cinema display.

And thanks to the guy that told me to get out more. Much appreciated. ****.
 
I would sure like to know where all you people are finding these media players that have Blu-ray and/or DVR functionality and cost less than the Apple TV ($229). Or similarly, all these devices that show that the Apple TV is overpriced and out of date.

Try the cost of these media players (prices are quotes from the manufacturer, but in some cases you can find slightly lower pricing on the internet):

Western Digital TV - $130 (no built-in networking, wireless, or hard disk drive).
Western Digital TV Live - $150 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour A-110 - $215 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Popcorn Hour C-200 - $299 (no built-in wireless or hard disk drive).
Roku HD - $100, no 802.11n and no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video .
Roku HD XR - $130, no hard disk drive, but requires Netflix monthly/yearly subscription service or purchases from Amazon Video.

The point is that you are showing retail prices of kit that can output 1080p for $130 (RETAIL), so obviously a next-gen :apple:TV could incorporate 1080p and still not go up in price. You're showing devices for $130 (RETAIL) that gives you access to thousands of movies via a Netflix subscription, so obviously a next-gen :apple:TV could have a similar deal. There are BD players priced below $150; talk is this Christmas we'll have BD players priced well below $100 (RETAIL). So a next-gen :apple:TV could include a BD player.

If we play the game of what :apple:TV has that other (better hardware) boxes lack, it's an easy argument to say how great :apple:TV is. I'll say it too: THE CURRENT :apple:TV IS GREAT FOR WHAT IT DOES NOW.

But, with that admission, I'm sure you can recognize that if WD and Roku's, etc can be sold for profit at substantially less than :apple:TV, a next-gen :apple:TV could absorb some of the missing hardware advances those products have and still be (profitably) sold at about the price it is right now.

Apple could OWN the space if they would treat their :apple:TV hardware initiatives like they just did with the new iMacs or the last round of iPhone- substantially up the hardware features while hanging onto the same price.

Is it a good value priced as is right now? That's an eye of the beholder question. If my :apple:TV died today, I'd immediately buy another. I find narrow individual features to be worth the purchase price. For example, I used to pay $300+ for a CD changer, $300+ for a DVD changer, etc.

But short of :apple:TV death will I buy another before they add features that can obviously be added as demonstrated by some of the very examples you cite? Absolutely not. It is way past due for a hardware refresh. It seems the market recognizes this, which contributes to why it is a "hobby" rather than another "leg of the table".

Ask yourselves this: if Apple had just rolled out an "open" :apple:TV 1080p with many of the hack features (features the current one CAN do that Apple chooses not to make standard) enabled, and at least "open" options for 3rd parties to offer adds-ons like a BD player, DVR (elgato) functionality, etc (for those that want such features), an :apple:TV app store, etc, what would probably be THE present from Apple under the tree this year?

Just writing it down has my money burning a hole in my pocket.
 
Just "Sales Push" That You Cannot Turn Off

I upgraded this morning. The interface may be a bit more efficient to use, but not that much better than before. The main difference is that now I have a bunch of crap displayed from the iTunes store that I don't want to see. I only want to see MY stuff. I want the CHOICE of browsing the iTunes store. I thought; "no problem, it's probably an options setting. Nope. Ok, I'll just log out of the store. Nope, still there. So the main purpose of the interface design seems to be to push more store content in your face. I suppose I could turn off the WIFI connection, but there really should be the option to "Turn Off iTunes Store".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.