I wish it would run in Snow Leopard..... 😡
Will app store even download it into a non ML machine?- To use with previous versions of Mac OS X:
1. Localize Logic Pro X.app in the Application folder.
2. Right-click on it and click on "Show Package Content"
3. Using a text editor open the file called "info.plist"
4. Using the function "Find" look up for the word "version"
5. Right at the end of the .plist document you will find these lines:
LSMinimumSystemVersion
10.8.4
6. Just edit the second line modifying the minimum OS X system version (for example: 10.7.4)
7. Save the new .plist document and enjoy Logic Pro X!
This should help you with that, I don't know whether it would run with Snow Leopard, as this guide is designed to allow it to run on Lion, but I guess it could be worth a shot if you're desperate? Or if you just have $200 to blow on something that might not work.
- To use with previous versions of Mac OS X:
1. Localize Logic Pro X.app in the Application folder.
2. Right-click on it and click on "Show Package Content"
3. Using a text editor open the file called "info.plist"
4. Using the function "Find" look up for the word "version"
5. Right at the end of the .plist document you will find these lines:
LSMinimumSystemVersion
10.8.4
6. Just edit the second line modifying the minimum OS X system version (for example: 10.7.4)
7. Save the new .plist document and enjoy Logic Pro X!

- To use with previous versions of Mac OS X:
1. Localize Logic Pro X.app in the Application folder.
2. Right-click on it and click on "Show Package Content"
3. Using a text editor open the file called "info.plist"
4. Using the function "Find" look up for the word "version"
5. Right at the end of the .plist document you will find these lines:
LSMinimumSystemVersion
10.8.4
6. Just edit the second line modifying the minimum OS X system version (for example: 10.7.4)
7. Save the new .plist document and enjoy Logic Pro X!
This should help you with that, I don't know whether it would run with Snow Leopard, as this guide is designed to allow it to run on Lion, but I guess it could be worth a shot if you're desperate? Or if you just have $200 to blow on something that might not work.
Already tried that. There are a large number of Lion/Mt. Lion system ibrary dependencies. I tried copying most of them into the Snow Leopard system library, but it still would not work. Finally I just gave up.
- To use with previous versions of Mac OS X:
1. Localize Logic Pro X.app in the Application folder.
2. Right-click on it and click on "Show Package Content"
3. Using a text editor open the file called "info.plist"
4. Using the function "Find" look up for the word "version"
5. Right at the end of the .plist document you will find these lines:
LSMinimumSystemVersion
10.8.4
6. Just edit the second line modifying the minimum OS X system version (for example: 10.7.4)
7. Save the new .plist document and enjoy Logic Pro X!
This should help you with that, I don't know whether it would run with Snow Leopard, as this guide is designed to allow it to run on Lion, but I guess it could be worth a shot if you're desperate? Or if you just have $200 to blow on something that might not work.
I can follow these instructions on my rMBP which is on 10.8.4 but on the Mac Pro on 10.8.3 it would not allow it to even be downloaded from the Mac App Store.
Copying it over from one machine to the other obviously doesn't work either.
Any suggestions for that besides "update to 10.8.4"?
Why won't copying it over from one machine to the other won't work...? As far as I was aware there wasn't any actual DRM in the App Store downloaded apps.
It shows up in Finder greyed out with a little circle with a line through it. Am I doing something wrong?
That's odd, must be a system thing though as you have the same iTunes accounts on both machines, right?. Does it even run at all/what error does it come up with?
did you check your security and privacy settings?It shows up in Finder greyed out with a little circle with a line through it. Am I doing something wrong?
Clicking on the app, nothing would happen at all. Using 'Launch Pad', it wouldn't show up there.
I also attempted the .plist trick, and that changed nothing.
I simply updated to 10.8.4 and its downloading now.
did you check your security and privacy settings?
By default it only allows apps downloaded from the app store.
By default it only allows apps downloaded from the app store.
its effin hideous. Looks like bargain been ware from 1995. What were they thinking? It looks completely cluttered. Forcing white waveforms on us is a joke right?
The graphics are ugly....really ugly. Been using Logic since early 9os.
Graphically it all feels bigger, clunkier, more kiddie.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
Apple today announced the launch of Logic Pro X, the next-generation version of its professional audio software. The release brings a completely revamped Logic Pro application including a new virtual drummer and integrated pitch editing, as well as an iPad companion app.
[snip]
Logic Pro X [Direct Link] launches in the Mac App Store today for $199.99, with live performance companion app MainStage 3 [Direct Link] priced at $29.99. The Logic Remote companion app for iPad [Direct Link] is available free through the iOS App Store. Apple has also removed the previous versions of Logic Pro and MainStage from the Mac App Store.
Article Link: Apple Launches Logic Pro X with Virtual Drummer and Flex Pitch
You DO realize in one post you've completely obliterated Apple's strategy for releasing this in the first place.... to force the millions of pro music users still using Snow Leopard because of the LEGION of sound "clicking" problems in Lion/Mountain Lion et al into the newest iOS/OS concoction? (while at the same time FINALLY acknowledging over in the Apple forums that there IS INDEED a problem and INDEED they're FINALLY taking a look at it).
The ONLY time I've ever upgraded the OS is when Logic demanded it. Luckily, the last thing in the world I need is a virtual "drummer". (That can't really follow prerecorded tracks worth a ****.)
Thank and bless you good sir! I hope it works.
P.S. That said and done, I AM glad Apple released this. For everyone ELSE. I have a feeling that Snow Leopard will never be going away.
So.... adding a feature YOU don't want automatically makes the ENTIRE environment a kiddie program? Oh excuse me, a professional kiddie program. 🙄
There's a lot of features in Logic 9 I don't use or necessarily care for, but I don't mind them being there because I don't have to use them. I'm still debating whether to even get Logic X at this time, so I have no idea how this drummer thing behaves, but I do know that I very often use basic tempo repeating beat tracks while I lay down the beginnings of a song as it makes it much easier to keep perfect time and get at least some inkling of rhythm started. I eventually remove (well mute) the track and put in my own drums. So I'm thinking if this thing can put down a real time beat track it might be useful in the early stages of a song. I surely wouldn't expect or even want it to do my drums for me. OTOH, not everyone out there has good timing and drumming skills. Not everyone out there is creating entire albums by themselves like some of us are either and might want some basic fill to toy with a piano part or whatever and pass it on to the next guy in the band or whatever. In short, I don't see the point in slamming a feature just because it seems like a toy at first. I still use my Roland Digital Piano's own built in beat tracks to play around with ideas in the living room as I find it helpful to hear some ideas to a pop or rock beat or whatever. Not every tool is for recording. Sometimes tools are good for helping creative ideas form.
So everyone on here who uses Logic (even professionally) is also a great singer in addition to being an ace drummer, master guitar player, concert pianist, etc.? I originally intended to write songs to sell to publishing companies for other artists to potentially pick up, but I discovered I could actually sing pretty well. I've touched up pitch on long holds in a couple of spots with Autotune, but for the most part I didn't need it on most of the songs. That doesn't mean it's not a useful tool or even to generate an electronic type sound (on overkill). Admittedly, there are a lot of "artists" out there that are famous and can't sing a note (image seems to be more important, although I wonder if that's as true as it was in the hey day of music videos and the original MTV where if you didn't look good (or at least freaky), you couldn't sell a tune to save your life (shame for real music and musicians, but obviously selling crap is the name of the game, not appealing to the high end snobs (i.e. J.K. Rowing isn't stinking rich because she's a great writer in line with Shakespeare; she's stinking rich because she wrote an appealing kids story).
I used to think the same way about automatic SLR cameras back when I was into photography in a big way. It made it so much easier for people to get "decent" (and the occasional great) photos, that it seemed unfair to those of us that know how to manually focus, expose and even develop film (i.e. real skills). Then came digital and it made it that much simpler to edit photos in things like Photoshop, take a zillion photos at high speed hoping to get a good one, etc. etc. It removes a lot of the old school skills that used to be REQUIRED in order to get truly great photos and starts to blur the lines. Basically, if you can frame things, you can get by these days (at least in daylight). Even if you can't frame things, you can always crop them later. Hell, I still find it irritating. The main difference between my brother and I is he'll take 2000 photos on a trip and 20 of them will look great and I'll take 200 photos and nearly ALL of them will look great plus I can take photos (night photos, long exposure effects, etc.) that even modern cameras don't generally do on their own.
In other words, no auto-drummer or even some future auto composer feature is going to write a song like Rock of Ages or Billie Jean. Apple does know there's money in selling to hobbyists and dabblers (probably a LOT more than to professionals as Final Cut X has shown).