Fake news isn’t a partisan issue. Both sides are spreading trash (and I don’t care who’s doing it more...that’s irrelevant). More information is needed and less opinion.
It's a great quote, but in this case there's no proof of its attribution. At least not yet. But the spirit is true enough.
Translation more of Timmy’s liberal indoctrination ******** while at the same time squashing any opposing ideas or thoughts. No thanks. Take your indoctrination and shove it Timmy.
ITMSchools shouldn't have CNN blasting. Instead, try C-SPAN and form your own opinion instead of absorbing someone else's wholesale
“Encourage critical thinking”
Translation more of Timmy’s liberal indoctrination ******** while at the same time squashing any opposing ideas or thoughts. No thanks. Take your indoctrination and shove it Timmy.
Fake news isn’t a partisan issue. Both sides are spreading trash (and I don’t care who’s doing it more...that’s irrelevant). More information is needed and less opinion.
I agree, in that, we need more news but all "news" is selected for the public's consumption. For years and years, I believe, one "news" organization had the slogan "All the news that's fit to print." The "news" providers use their opinion to determine what is "news" and what isn't. Even without considering the way the news is written, the bias of what is news worthy is already baked in the information the public is exposed to on a daily basis. So much is happening in the world and yet all the "news" channels have the same stories. "News" outlets direct and shape the public's opinions on issues from the very beginning of deciding what is "news."Fake news isn’t a partisan issue. Both sides are spreading trash (and I don’t care who’s doing it more...that’s irrelevant). More information is needed and less opinion.
Sorry but this is nonsense. It's the older crowd that is repeatedly falling for fake news.
The problem is many people equate “hate” with “things I don’t agree with” or “things I find distasteful” which is not actually “hate.”It was a lot more difficult to spread hate, misinformation, and propaganda on the old web. You had to pay your monthly hosting bill, which could be expensive depending on your traffic, and getting your message out there was more difficult because search engines were primitive and you didn't have social media to propagate it.
Now people use the web as their primary source of news, hosting is dirt cheap, and you can spam your crap on Facebook and Twitter.
A rugged individualist should see no issue with teaching people critical thinking skills. It's literally teaching people to think for themselves.The problem is many people equate “hate” with “things I don’t agree with” or “things I find distasteful” which is not actually “hate.”
People should be free to be rugged individuals without a censor or nanny trying to tell them what is or is not “misinformation.”
The tech companies are going down a dark road. Apple should stay out of this space and “think different.”
I liked the old Web better. You had all the sources available to you, and you had to pick what you think is right.
This is just another face of censorship.
Eye roll...
[doublepost=1553034597][/doublepost]
The problem is many people equate “hate” with “things I don’t agree with” or “things I find distasteful” which is not actually “hate.”
People should be free to be rugged individuals without a censor or nanny trying to tell them what is or is not “misinformation.”
Sorry but this is nonsense. It's the older crowd that is repeatedly falling for fake news.
Yes, the old stick your head in the sand and hope it goes away method. Pretty sure that isn't helpful at all.
Not a new problem, but an exponentially amplified one.This isn't a new problem. Critical thinking has always been a struggle.
If people need to rely on a tech company to teach them "critical thinking skills," we're in a whole lot of trouble already.A rugged individualist should see no issue with teaching people critical thinking skills. It's literally teaching people to think for themselves.
I don't think Apple or any other tech company should be teaching "critical thinking skills."The old web had less people who were spreading things that were batsh*t crazy or government bots because the old web had less economical and political impact. I'm not saying they didn't exist, but they didn't exist out in the open in the way they do today with a mainstream audience.
[doublepost=1553037528][/doublepost]
And why do you think so many people equate hate speech with "things I find distasteful"? Because they don't have critical thinking skills and have the strong urge to blindly hate and block out anyhing they don't agree with.
Ya think?If people need to rely on a tech company to teach them "critical thinking skills," we're in a whole lot of trouble already.