Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have a pair of Audio-Technica cans that I love. They’re plastic too. Doesn’t bother me at all as they’re very comfortable to wear.
I have plastic headphones too and they don't bother me because they don't make plastic-y popping sounds when I adjust them. The Beats solo and Studio models do. For the price, that's unforgivable.
 
I always felt the Beats acquisition was a mistake. I have seen nothing yet to overturn that impression.
That's because you are not their target market.

Beats is the Nike of the headphone world. They are on all the athletes (NFL, NBA, NHL) players as they are warming up or walking off the bus. Their image and sponsorships were worth the pricetag apple paid. The product however.. not so much (but the people buying them are not concerned about that).
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus and WWPD
Ahem...these are $349.

microsoft-surface-headphones-29.jpg


https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/8/...face-headphones-release-date-pricing-features

What's the relevance of those headphones?
 
That's because you are not their target market.

Beats is the Nike of the headphone world. They are on all the athletes (NFL, NBA, NHL) players as they are warming up or walking off the bus. Their image and sponsorships were worth the pricetag apple paid. The product however.. not so much (but the people buying them are not concerned about that).
This used to be true until Bose started buying up league sponsorships.
 
Does anybody honestly buy Beats headphones anymore other than to satisfy some aesthetic appeal?

In my opinion, they feel really cheap and flimsy and the ones I've had in my hands (1-2 years old) were really damaged and half-broken, the cord's isolation all ripped and the hinge feeling absolutely horrible.

Why not invest the same money into real quality headphones from the likes of Beyerdynamics or other similar manufacturers? 350$ can get you some really fine Hifi-gear...

Can't say this version since haven't tried them, although considering Cook's apple is mostly about cutting corners to raise margins, these likely are no exception.

In regards the previous models, if you get a chance to open up a broken pair, it's basically overpriced plastic junk with mediocre audio quality, the inside components are a joke, cables look like the cheapest ever made.

Much older classics like technics mkII or sennheiser hd-25 (or models with more isolation as well) wipe beats off without a sweat.
 
I think all the beats too much bass. Don’t think ‘studio’ and Beats go together but lots of companies throw in hi fi terminology for their marketing.
 
No thanks.

Still uses USB-A. Switch to Lightning or USB-C for charging.

Still uses Apple W1. Apple Watch Series 3 has W2, Apple Watch Series 4 has W3.

Yes, this puzzles me. I'm sure the W1 chip is still up to the job, but why is Apple selling premium headphones with 3-year old technology inside?

As for comments about these not having good sound quality, you can't judge a book by its cover. We have no idea what engineering has gone into these over previous models. The sound quality may indeed be top of the class.

As for the price, yes expensive, but no different than past models, no? The Pro models sell for $439 here in Canada.
 
Does anybody honestly buy Beats headphones anymore other than to satisfy some aesthetic appeal?

In my opinion, they feel really cheap and flimsy and the ones I've had in my hands (1-2 years old) were really damaged and half-broken, the cord's isolation all ripped and the hinge feeling absolutely horrible.

Why not invest the same money into real quality headphones from the likes of Beyerdynamics or other similar manufacturers? 350$ can get you some really fine Hifi-gear...

I can never remember the names of other headphone products. They usually have weird names like X6320-2 or Beyerdynamics or some brand I am not familiar. I am know Sony, Microsoft, and Bose have headphones.
[doublepost=1539718751][/doublepost]
Why comment on things you clearly know nothing about? Higher number doesn't mean newer and better.. Apple W1 is bluetooth, Apple W2 and Apple W3 is bluetooth+WiFi and is not meant for headphones....

We are just conditioned by the number system from products that we use.
PowerPC G3, PowerPC G4, ... G5. Intel i3, i5, i7, i9. Apple's A8, A9, A10. iPhone 6, 7, 8, Apple Watch Series 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. Beats Studio 2, Studio 3.
 
Does anybody honestly buy Beats headphones anymore other than to satisfy some aesthetic appeal?

In my opinion, they feel really cheap and flimsy and the ones I've had in my hands (1-2 years old) were really damaged and half-broken, the cord's isolation all ripped and the hinge feeling absolutely horrible.

Why not invest the same money into real quality headphones from the likes of Beyerdynamics or other similar manufacturers? 350$ can get you some really fine Hifi-gear...

I think you're on to a great idea here. Instead of sending reviewers new products to evaluate, we should send them old models that are actually broken and ask them to review those.

In other words, I am utterly shocked that you think they're not good headphones, given the ones you tried were old and broken. Shocked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deebinem
Does anybody honestly buy Beats headphones anymore other than to satisfy some aesthetic appeal?

In my opinion, they feel really cheap and flimsy and the ones I've had in my hands (1-2 years old) were really damaged and half-broken, the cord's isolation all ripped and the hinge feeling absolutely horrible.

Why not invest the same money into real quality headphones from the likes of Beyerdynamics or other similar manufacturers? 350$ can get you some really fine Hifi-gear...


I have the power beats-3 and beats-X an id say they are really good better than what was previously offered... Running with power beats are awesome and casual walking or riding the train with beats-x are good and plenty ear-tips to choose from, Not full noise cancellation but well enough.

My Bose QC's are on there last leg with warranty, So I'm looking for some new over ear headphone may just grab these..
 
I'm sure the Beats Studio 4 will have a different charging method when/if they ever come out. This is just a few new colors. I'm not sure why anyone was expecting a dramatic redesign right now.
 
Yes, this puzzles me. I'm sure the W1 chip is still up to the job, but why is Apple selling premium headphones with 3-year old technology inside?

What would you like an updated W1 chip to do that the current one doesn’t? Be specific.

With respect to using 3-year old technology...well look at the people who whined when Apple canned the 20 year old USB-A ports on their MacBook Pros.
 
Perhaps you should try them instead of writing things like this? Just because a brand have had some bad products in the past doesn't mean all future products needs to follow the same trend.

The Beats Studio3 are decent. You can get better audio quality and active noise cancellation elsewhere, but they do provide you with the benefits of the Apple W1 chip (easy pairing and switching between Apple devices, market leading range and battery life) and one thing they have that pretty much every other lacks is actual useable microphone.

They feature a very V-shaped audio profile. This provides a focused, but rather narrow soundstage. It's great for spoken word (podcasts, audiobooks etc..) and for commutes as its easier to hear the audio in noise environments when the soundstage is narrow and in focus instead of wide and spacious. The active noise cancellation is decent, but not the same level as Bose QC35 and Sony WH1000XM2/3.

Overall its a rather decent package, especially for Apple users due to the Apple W1-chip.
At Apple's prices there should be no compromise, they should just be the best
 
Who needs a mac mini if he can have a Beats Studio 3 Wireless Skyline Collection headphone?

Well done, Apple!
 
  • Like
Reactions: entropys
Does anybody honestly buy Beats headphones anymore other than to satisfy some aesthetic appeal?

In my opinion, they feel really cheap and flimsy and the ones I've had in my hands (1-2 years old) were really damaged and half-broken, the cord's isolation all ripped and the hinge feeling absolutely horrible.

Why not invest the same money into real quality headphones from the likes of Beyerdynamics or other similar manufacturers? 350$ can get you some really fine Hifi-gear...

Speaking of flimsy cords. You ever see a MagSafe or lightning cable after a year? Yeah, seems that these Beats fit in really well with Apple's product line.
 
I have plastic headphones too and they don't bother me because they don't make plastic-y popping sounds when I adjust them. The Beats solo and Studio models do. For the price, that's unforgivable.
I’ve owned a pair of beats solo 3 since they launched a few years ago and they never made the sound you claim they do
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
Wireless will never sound as good as wired for the same price. If I wanted to plunk down 350 bills for hi fi headphones, they sure as heck wouldn't be wireless.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.