Half the cores.
Half the clock.
Half the disk.
Crummy tablet RAM; unexpandable.
But a BIG 16% savings!
Any money Apple makes on this should be spent on Ouija Board technology to try and get in touch with Steve Jobs.
Oh I get it. Taking a page from the British automotive industry.
What's wrong with the current design? Does the case of a desktop really matter that much to people? It's like the ever-thinning iMac. Nobody I know ever gets very excited about the thickness of a desktop. Maybe it matters much to people I don't know???
Why is this important? Are people finding the footprint of the current mini just too onerous? Does someone's desktop really need that inch or two freed up?
Without an SSD that CPU will fall flat on its face. The reason the MacBook Airs work so well is because of the SSD. It's not a bad value but it's certainly not good value either. It's just a meh... Fine for mom and dad.
Exactly. Without the SSD its going to be a total dog. But yeah, grandma won't mind since she computes like she drives.
I've never understood the downtime thing...don't they have a duplicate of their production system that they could change and test, then flip the switch? I thought that was standard procedure since the 1970s.
Perry
Why? That is barely enough to load osx. 8 is minimum for a reason today and I highly recommend getting 16 gb ram
Why? That is barely enough to load osx. 8 is minimum for a reason today and I highly recommend getting 16 gb ram
1.4 GHz in a desktop computer at this price?
Surely that's a typo...
Just checked Apple's store and it says the same thing.
1.4 GHz for $1099 or 2.7 GHz for $1299. They're the same line of CPU, so it's an apples to apples comparison. For an 18% increase in price, you double the CPU and the storage capacity. The GPU also changes, but it changes lines entirely so there's no easy way to say how much better one is than the other.
Development work goes much faster with a 2560x1440 pixel count screen because of the need for multiple source file editing windows, debugging consoles, etc. Skip any 21 inch 1920x1080 model like this one.I've been waiting for Apple to announce their lower cost iMac to see what the specs would be. What does everyone think is the best iMac model for building an app? I'm a new developer and am just starting to learn how to code, so I'm certainly not making Infinity Blade here! But I also want to make sure I get a new Mac that has good specs to support app development.
My thought is that is should be a quad core chip and have at least 16gb of ram. I'm uncertain about the graphics card. I don't think the lower priced iMac has good enough specs for what I'm looking to do, but would love to hear what others think!
Thanks!
I've never understood the downtime thing...don't they have a duplicate of their production system that they could change and test, then flip the switch? I thought that was standard procedure since the 1970s.
Perry
Half the cores.
Half the clock.
Half the disk.
Crummy tablet RAM; unexpandable.
But a BIG 16% savings!
Any money Apple makes on this should be spent on Ouija Board technology to try and get in touch with Steve Jobs.
That's nice if we are talking about preferences, but overall anyone that is considering a computer like the MBA or iMac really only has two choices to make:
1) do I want to take it with me
2) do I NOT want to take it with me.
After that, the rest of it will be preference sure.
Even with it being $300 less, the iMac gives a larger screen and more HDD space, more USB 3.0 ports, more Thunderbolt ports, and wireless keyboard and mouse included.
Buying an Air, even with an SSD, just to leave it on the desk for most of it's life really does pale in comparison.
We really just shouldn't be comparing an AIO desktop to a MBA in terms of value.
Without an SSD that CPU will fall flat on its face. The reason the MacBook Airs work so well is because of the SSD. It's not a bad value but it's certainly not good value either. It's just a meh... Fine for mom and dad.
These threads crack me up! Apple could put a baloney sandwhich in an iMac case and the Apple apologists here would compare it to the Mona Lisa! C'mon people, this super low performance iMac with the big price really has me scratching my head. I'm a big Apple fan but what is this?
july, and this is all apple can come up with?? not even an update to the i7 with 880m and the latest i7 processor with tb2 (that wouldnt be a complex update for them to do). geez I hope this and the MB air isnt part of what tim cook and eddy cue looks upon as a year of impressive product upgrades...effortless upgrades IMO.
So if you're running the show, the low spec entry level Mac gets 16GB RAM?