I hope one will be able to use own or independent models as welli mean, the demo was pretty clear, Siri will suggest using a 3rd party AI to answer the question; you have to accept and then the request is sent to OAI
I hope one will be able to use own or independent models as welli mean, the demo was pretty clear, Siri will suggest using a 3rd party AI to answer the question; you have to accept and then the request is sent to OAI
It’s already off by default. You need to find the on switch ig you wang tonyse ut. 😊Cool….now show me the off switch!
Well put, but I don't think the implications could be huge. They are huge. As big as the implications of the printing press and the start of the Industrial Revolution. Like printing and industrial production, the are potential positive uses and potential negative uses of AI. I don't think have adequate systems in place to map out that balance, nor sufficient safeguards from preventing the negative side dominating. Do we really want to abdicate our control over AI to engineers and CEO's with huge professional and financial conflicts of interest?The drive for embedding AI deep into a variety of OS is at full speed. For a lot of us it’s still not 100 percent clear what is doing what behind the scenes, where the training data and other data sets the current iteration of AI have been “trained” on and what mitigations are in place for security and privacy. Yes they talk about on device AI processing. But a lot of what we do is on device and security remains a concern.
AI undoubtedly has huge benefits but there is a massive rush to be the first. And a patch it later mentality. I mean the legal and moral ramifications have still not been fully communicated and discussed in public for many of these technologies. The ramifications could be huge.
Musk rant in 3, 2, 1...As part of its Apple Intelligence feature set, Apple on Monday announced a partnership with OpenAI that will allow Siri to access ChatGPT directly in iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia to provide better responses in relevant situations.
In conversation with reporters after the WWDC keynote, Apple's senior VP of software engineering Craig Federighi revealed that as Apple Intelligence evolves, the company eventually wants to give its users a choice between different AI models, and suggested that Google Gemini could be an option in the future.
Seems Apple has no problem leveraging Open AI’s completely unlicensed dataset. Noted. I knew to expect this from Microsoft but I still had a little hope for Apple to do the right thing.
All big tech companies are trying to outrun legislation and grab as much data and IP for their models as they can before it catches up. Privacy and copyright seem to be yesteryear’s things.
With the security concerns and a 14PM I am not in rush to update to iOS 18. Hope apple comes with its own AI.
Good, I don't trust ChatGPT one bit and think they are super shady with how they took data and stole peoples voices essentialy, would much rather use Gemini, google at least has some ethics when it comes to AI. Also like the idea of it being like a browser.. pick the AI of your choice to backend Siri and other apps.
This all kind of reminds me of when Apple integrated social media into iOS in a sort of piecemeal fashion. First Twitter was integrated in iOS 5, then iOS 6 added Facebook. Then years later they did away with that whole deep integration of social media, and instead added share extensions that social media apps could leverage instead.
I feel like we're seeing the same thing here. First Apple is integrating ChatGPT, next Apple will integrate Gemini, and a few years later Apple say remove it all and introduce AIExtensionKit or something that will let apps plug-in their LLMs.
The same thing that happens when you do a google search.I like the idea of ”on machine” intelligence but am very wary of my devices being connected to outside AI. Maybe I am just old fashioned.
What could go wrong? 🤬
Good. "Intellectual Property" is a plague on humanity that has severely held back progress, and all this handwringing over what data people are training their models on is incredibly dumb. We can only hope the cat is too far out of the bag on this for governments to pass stupid laws that will ruin everything.Seems Apple has no problem leveraging Open AI’s completely unlicensed dataset. Noted. I knew to expect this from Microsoft but I still had a little hope for Apple to do the right thing.
All big tech companies are trying to outrun legislation and grab as much data and IP for their models as they can before it catches up. Privacy and copyright seem to be yesteryear’s things.
Seems Apple has no problem leveraging Open AI’s completely unlicensed dataset. Noted. I knew to expect this from Microsoft but I still had a little hope for Apple to do the right thing.
All big tech companies are trying to outrun legislation and grab as much data and IP for their models as they can before it catches up. Privacy and copyright seem to be yesteryear’s things.
Why does Apple need to provide their own advanced language model? They don’t need to do everything. They never made a search engine for example.While Cook‘s vision had him busy pouring money down the Apple Car and VP drains AI left them in the dust. Apple is so far behind the curve they have to resort to buying canned AI.
No. People tend to complain only when they don’t like something and mostly stay quiet when they are content. The AI lovers complained when it wasn’t good. The AI haters complain now that it’s implemented. There is probably some overlap as well between people who wanted Apple’s AI to get better and not have to use some third party at all. There will always be haters. The circle of hate continues unabated.It's weird, people have been complaining for years that Apple is late in AI, that Siri is dumb and needs AI, that AI features on other devices like Samsung are so cool compared to Apple.
ChatGPT had the fastest growing user base in history, and everybody seems to love generative AI for everything including writing, photo editing or image generation.
But now that Apple introduced these feature, all of a sudden everybody hates AI 🤔
Apple Intelligence*
*Using other AI models.
Apple missed the AI train. They don't "skate to where the puck is going to be" like back when Steve ran the show.
I think it’s very clear that their in-house efforts will continue to expand, as they explicitly stated, and eventually you’ll only need external specialized “AI’s” if your really down the rabbit hole in specialized fields.This all kind of reminds me of when Apple integrated social media into iOS in a sort of piecemeal fashion. First Twitter was integrated in iOS 5, then iOS 6 added Facebook. Then years later they did away with that whole deep integration of social media, and instead added share extensions that social media apps could leverage instead.
I feel like we're seeing the same thing here. First Apple is integrating ChatGPT, next Apple will integrate Gemini, and a few years later Apple say remove it all and introduce AIExtensionKit or something that will let apps plug-in their LLMs.
People seem to be upset with possible Gemini integration, but no one has really noticed what they done to the photos app - it is full "1984" now. No privacy whatsoever, every photo is being analyzed each second with no off switch/opt out. Recent scandal with iOS 17.5 does not make things look better. Many stuff from yesterday's Apple event looked like one big dystopian fewer dream
Doesn't happen on my Mac tho, only if I use photos app (maybe, because I don't use it). On iOS and iPad OS Photos app is the only way for storing and organizing photos. If Apple gave me possibility to shoot photos straight into Files folders, I would go for it, makes better organizing experience (this feature is available on all Samsungs, probably Apple will copy it in few years).Umm… you’re the one who put your data on your device. That device attempts to make it easier for you to access that data, by recognizing, categorizing, and organizing that data on the device.
Yeah… so analyzing photos has been a feature for years to make it possible for people to search for specific photos. How else do you think that works? Apple has been transparent about the fact that only happens on device and not on their servers. In fact, YOU have the option to completely encrypt all your data before it’s even backed up to Apple’s servers.
Because the question has already been answered I guess.Why…… is the most valuable tech company in the world incapable of creating their own ai?
Why…. isn’t anyone asking this question?