I agree. It’s getting so draining seeing everyone being cynical all the time.I am going to assume positive intent and that you’re complimenting them. Because we need the internet to be more friendly.
I agree. It’s getting so draining seeing everyone being cynical all the time.I am going to assume positive intent and that you’re complimenting them. Because we need the internet to be more friendly.
Apple would not be able to do this because then they would lose all of their bug discoverers.how about giving people the option to downgrade back to older software because the new one just ain't it
in the first graphic, you're showing the last update of that version, so it's expected to have point releases for security issues that had crop up since then
Good maybe they will fix bug in ios 17.1 in 17.1.1 OR its a bug in icloud contacts on http://icloud.com but its where when u go on http://icloud.com > data recovery>deleted contacts it says Ive deleted contacts when I havent. I just got the new iphone se 2022 2 wks ago. I thought the bug was fixed after a few days then it did it again few days later.
I never said it didn't exist, but did every x.1 have an accompanying x.x.1 release like now?View attachment 2308359
View attachment 2308361
View attachment 2308363
View attachment 2308365
Do I really need to keep going?
It's not just Apple. Nowadays almost every company release Unfinished products
I never said it didn't exist, but did every x.1 have an accompanying x.x.1 release like now?
he only listed the ones that supported his caseYes.
His screenshots clearly show they did.
he only listed the ones that supported his case
That would completely defeat the point of bug and security patcheshow about giving people the option to downgrade back to older software because the new one just ain't it
Show us the ones that don’t?
They need lean more heavily on professional, paid beta testers -- as I assume they used to do -- instead of relying on unpaid volunteers.What is the point of the Beta program when the final product still sucks? You get 7 betas and you would think these major things would be addressed and fixed in that stage. Yet, here we are with updates that fix pretty big things and it just makes the Beta program all the more pointless.
I never said it didn't exist, but did every x.1 have an accompanying x.x.1 release like now?
View attachment 2308443
sure, here is Yosemite. I dont see ONE x.x.x.1 release
They need lean more heavily on professional, paid beta testers -- as I assume they used to do -- instead of relying on unpaid volunteers.
Fair enough -- more investment in alpha testing instead of the volunteer-heavy beta testing then.Those are alpha testers.
Beta testers are and always have been predominantly end users of some sort. Usually people registered in the Apple developer system (which ironically - we were not only unpaid, but we actually paid a subscription to be in the program…)
But in the past few years Apple opened the beta program to the general public, without needing to be a registered developer.
So the time you spent posting in this thread and “researching” those releases, you could have applied 3 or 4 updates alreadyView attachment 2308443
sure, here is Yosemite. I dont see ONE x.x.x.1 release
let me school you for a minute here son.. in the pre-AS days, there used to be a default 10. (OS X) in front of all version numbers. Since Big Sur, they dropped that even though internally it was still referencedSo which are you upset with? Because you started with x.x.1 and then shifted to x.x.x.1 when the data didn’t support your position.
I see five x.x.1 releases for Yosemite - and all of those security releases listed there count too…
Tim Cook, that MBA beancounter, is not doing anywhere near enough to fix bugs. Instead of hiring more programmers to fix bugs, he chooses not to do that—despite Apple's trillions of dollars in value—and instead opts for even more profits by cutting corners and pushing out more and more new features. I'm sure his MBA idols at McKinsey and Goldman Sachs would be proud.