What crap are you refering to? Cracked screens, perhaps?![]()
There are lots of new, innovative and colorful PC designs out there.
I don't blame you for wanting to lump them all into a crap bin and snap your fingers when Apple stuff has all looked the same for the last three years. Envy's a bitch when your hip and sleek stuff is merely old and stale.
If it hasn't been different in three years, they'll look absurd for trotting out a reused "think different" ad campaign.
That's not "innovation" "that just works." Sorry, no RFID is strong enough to pull that off.
Generally, most computer systems look similar, with the exception of the iMac. Metal? Check. Plastic? Check. Glass? Check. Logo? Check.
However, when it comes to design and ergonomics, Apple's industrial design team does not leave any little detail left unexamined. This is painfully evident with Steve Jobs' notorious perfection with regards to any produced Apple product. Stating that Windows based systems have more identity or design than Apple is an unfounded opinion. Not too many companies have received recognition and awards for their ergonomics and industrial design. A good example (one of many):


Aesthetics alone, the MacBook Air wins hands down. Now with the iMac running a quad core desktop processor in a 27" LEC LCD display, I'd take that over a large, unoriginal box any day. Most users who are concerned with power and speed they'll never fully actualize are the few who don't appreciate the hours and forethought that have gone into making Apple systems thinner, lighter, more energy efficient and eco-conscious, easier to operate while being less of an eye sore.
Apple doesn't need to do anything clichéd (such as Dell's "lollypop" netbooks) to sell their products, besides they did the "flower power" eMacs in the late 90's. It was cute, but been done. Why should they? When Apple is topping their sales every quarter, why change a good thing? Just fine tune it.