Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No issue discovered with iPad throttling

Ok, then the question becomes why does the iPhone 6s need to be throttled to prevent sudden shutdowns but iPhone 5s and older and all iPads don't need to be throttled when they have old batteries. The current iPad has the same a9 chip as iPhone 6s models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
Of course, Apple will keep on offering to change your battery for the normal $79 fee if it doesn‘t fall into the „failed/replace“ status (yet) - and therefore not causing any throtteling, but "only" less hours usetime before having to charge again - if you wish to. What are you smoking? As written above, they would gladly take your $79 even if your battery was still 99% healthy if you (moronically) insisted to have it changed. No need to fail the health diagnostic test for this, you are simply wrong.

And: No, iPhones are NOT throttled if the battery already shows significant signs of wear, but still is within the specifications of "healthy".

You are incorrect . For apple to take you $79 - the battery must fail the test. This has been confirmed by members across many threads on this issue.

I suggest you confirm this, cause you will look very silly if you keep mocking me over this.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
"iPhone 6 or later". Does "Later" = "Older", or does that mean 6 series through X? Originally read that it was 6 and 'older', but the language here isn't as clear. Battery life on my 7 was worse than my 2 year old 6, even on day 1. For $29, I'll replace it without thinking twice.
And where does the SE fit in that timeline?
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Ok, then the question becomes why does the iPhone 6s need to be throttled to prevent sudden shutdowns but iPhone 5s and older and all iPads don't need to be throttled when they have old batteries. The current iPad has the same a9 chip as iPhone 6s models.

Size of batteries would be the simple answer. The iPad has a far larger battery, so while powering the same chip it wouldn't potentially see the peaks and valleys a smaller battery would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atomic Walrus
I’m sure people will be in denial and cry “conspiracy” when I say that my iPhone X will be my last Apple product. I am convinced this was just done to force people to upgrade rather than assist dying batteries as they claim.

This is just another shady practice (remember http://www.deccanchronicle.com/tech...ed-for-forcing-users-to-upgrade-to-ios-7.html, internal emails show the shady nature of how they go about things - zero communication with consumers, pretending it was a “bug”). Some people still defend that...

Meh, iOS hasn’t been as good to me since the 4S days anyway, that wasn’t perfect but my 6,6s and 7 were far from a great user experience. Their 2016 MacBook lineup also ruined that line of business for me (sold my 2014 rMBP for a 2016, which I ended up returning...). It’s not even about the money anymore, I earn £500 a day. I moved from Android and accepted the walled garden, with less features than the competition on the grounds of a better experience and stability. The latter is no longer true.

Feel the same.

To be honest I felt the same before any of this even case to light. I skipped the X but upgraded to the iPhone 8 and have got a 2016 15 inch MacBook Pro but the ever increasing prices and rapid;y declining quality were driving me away anyway, this battery issue just adds insult to injury.

I'm in the Uk aswell so yeah, WhatsApp. Probably use it more than iMessage already tbh.
 
You are incorrect . For apple to take you $79 - the battery must fail the test. This has been confirmed by members across many threads on this issue.

I suggest you confirm this, cause you will look very silly if you keep mocking me over this.....

May you show me those threads where Apple denied to change the battery because it still was "healthy" even if the customer specifically insisted AND was willing to pay the $79 fee? I am pretty sure you are simply confusing this with cases where customers felt they are eligible to have it changed within warranty - because in their eyes it has to be replaced where the diagnostic tool says something different. Or they are just telling ********.

Apple will happily take your money for any of their list-price repairs they earn good money with.
 
Why are iPads not included in this $29 deal? Do iPads have better batteries than iPhones?

On another forum members ran tests, and the iPhone 6S throttled even over 80% , while the iPad remained at a constant speed.

I suspect the iPad power management does not have issues with poor batteries. Other iPhones previously also did not shutdown when the battery was old, seems engineering got their design wrong on 6 and 6s
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
I'm curious to know what people think happens on a device when they see the phrase "Power Management", for example as relates to what was discussed back when iOS 10.2.1 was released to address the shutdowns? For me, it always has meant "Monkeying with CPU and GPU since they are so power hungry" and is similar to how laptops on battery power are managed (switching between dGPU,iGPU for example).

I think Apple should have explained at the time, in a support doc maybe, that Power Management = "Monkeying with CPU and GPU since they are so power hungry". Also, they should have put more smarts into the algorithm than is immediately apparent (it seems rather brute force).
 
Ok, then the question becomes why does the iPhone 6s need to be throttled to prevent sudden shutdowns but iPhone 5s and older and all iPads don't need to be throttled when they have old batteries. The current iPad has the same a9 chip as iPhone 6s models.

The iPhone 5s has a lower speed processor core. The arm64 core in the 6s can likely be clocked up to several much faster and more power hungry modes. iPads have much larger (thus much lower impedance, even when old) Li-ion batteries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodWheaties
I tried to scan through all of the posts but I'm not sure what constitutes a battery fail. Is it just full capacity under 80% or do they have to go through more testing? Mine is at 76% of original capacity and will shut down under 5%, sometimes 10% if it's working hard. Thanks in advance for your help, don't want to go through the hassle of heading to an apple store and find out it didn't fail their test.
 
I tried to scan through all of the posts but I'm not sure what constitutes a battery fail. Is it just full capacity under 80% or do they have to go through more testing? Mine is at 76% of original capacity and will shut down under 5%, sometimes 10% if it's working hard. Thanks in advance for your help, don't want to go through the hassle of heading to an apple store and find out it didn't fail their test.

Just wait for January when Apple will include battery info into iOS. This - or an official Apple diagnostic test on your device - will be the binding value. Results by third-party apps like Coconut can give good estimates, but - especially at the edge of 80% - are not binding.
 
May you show me those threads where Apple denied to change the battery because it still was "healthy" even if the customer specifically insisted AND was willing to pay the $79 fee? I am pretty sure you are simply confusing this with cases where customers felt they are eligible to have it changed within warranty - because in their eyes it has to be replaced where the diagnostic tool says something different. Or they are just telling ********.

Apple will happily take your money for any of their list-price repairs they earn good money with.
May you show me those threads where Apple denied to change the battery because it still was "healthy" even if the customer specifically insisted AND was willing to pay the $79 fee? I am pretty sure you are simply confusing this with cases where customers felt they are eligible to have it changed within warranty - because in their eyes it has to be replaced where the diagnostic tool says something different. Or they are just telling ********.

Apple will happily take your money for any of their list-price repairs they earn good money with.

It might be good if you read a few of these threads and add some constructive feedback ? Do it on your time please, I'm not digging through over 200 pages of debate ....
 
The iPhone 5s has a lower speed processor core. The arm64 core in the 6s can likely be clocked up to several much faster and more power hungry modes. iPads have much larger (thus much lower impedance, even when old) Li-ion batteries.

it's also possible the A7 or 5s doesn't have the internal hardware to work with the power/throttling routines Apple is able to use with an A8 or above.
 
It might be good if you read a few of these threads and add some constructive feedback ? Do it on your time please, I'm not digging through over 200 pages of debate ....

I would - if those threads existed and were reliable. Again and for the last time: Apple will happily take your $79 for a normal, non-discounted iPhone battery change if you insist on it - no matter which condition.
 
Why are iPads not included in this $29 deal? Do iPads have better batteries than iPhones?

It boils down to the ability of the battery to provide voltage for peak power. The smaller iPhone batteries don't have as much overhead for that as larger iPad batteries.
 
Just wait for January when Apple will include battery info into iOS. This - or an official Apple diagnostic test on your device - will be the binding value. Results by third-party apps like Coconut can give good estimates, but - especially at the edge of 80% - are not binding.

These apps are getting the info from the iPhone firmware , coconut reads it from the same place as apple diagnostics does .

All January will bring is that value to iOS, you can get it now.....
 
I would - if those threads existed and were reliable. Again and for the last time: Apple will happily take your $79 for a normal, non-discounted iPhone battery change if you insist on it - no matter which condition.

Okay - shown me where that is stated .
 
Or I can do it myself right??!

So Apple now gets to play big brother with a Device I own ?
You can do whatever you want to do to your phone. You can smash it with a hammer and Apple can't or won't stop you. You can replace the battery yourself. Go ahead - Apple will do nothing (nor will they know nor care !!).
 
This is getting tiring...
Apple is guilt-tripping us to give up the outrage with these staggered 'gifts'.

Nothing has changed:
- the iPhones were under-designed at the battery, unable to power the CPU
- they are still expecting us to pay for their coverup and mass recall
- newer iPhones will still throttle after about a year
- iPhones with replaced battery will again throttle after a year
- iPhones with low battery charge (not health) will still throttle
- iPhones above 80% battery health will still throttle and we will be denied any service to the battery since it's above 80%
- the throttling will still be permanent regardles of moment-to-moment conditions
- absolutely no goodwill to those tricked into upgrading to a newer iPhone
- we will still not get an option in iOS for wether to throttle or not
- the scam and coverup is not acknowledged at all

I'll edit the post if more comes to mind.
 
These apps are getting the info from the iPhone firmware , coconut reads it from the same place as apple diagnostics does .

All January will bring is that value to iOS, you can get it now.....

I had a case of a failing MacBook battery - Coconut already showed only ~76% health, the official Apple diagnostic tool still showed 80,03% (and the green "good" symbol). I still had to wait a few weeks longer until Apple was willing to replace the battery under Apple Care. So, no - you are wrong again.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.