So an iPod touch is just an iPhone without cellular, right? That's the ONLY difference?
Why? It's a great, cheap way into the iOS/Apple ecosystem. At this point, between iMessage, FaceTime, Skype and a host of others you could basically use it as a phone wherever you can get wifi -- and with a monthly bill of zero dollars. Hell, you could pay for an Apple Music subscription, a big iCloud plan and still be spending only a fraction of the monthly phone bill for a typical iPhone user.Another iPod would be stupid
You don't *have* to get a plan with a phone. Why do so many people not understand this? Instead of getting $200 for your old phone on eBay, keep it without a plan. Perfect for kids or friends with no money.
I have the Gen 5 and support for that and the last revision was V9.3. With that, you can't download any new apps and old ones won't work well. I can't get updates for iTunes either. If you were able to update then you must have the Gen 6.We bought one for my son. It's a 5th or 6th gen and gets iOS 12 updates. It's perfect for him, to play games on and hold. Rather, than a big 'ole tablet. Plus, it keeps my kids off our iPhones and not dropping ours. Almost, thinking of buying another for my daughter.
Exactly!
Now that the USB-IF has announced support for what is essentially hardware DRM, you can bet that Apple will be including USB C on all of their iOS devices. This allows Apple to produce devices with a USB-C port that will only support certain approved USB-C cables/adapters.
Do you really think so? It’s dead on arrival imho. There are to many cheaper phones in China, India with even better specs. It won’t sell. Too late.iPod Touch would be a great product in emerging markets like china and India because it's cheap and it introduces consumers to the apple ecosystem.
There's definitely a market for an updated iPod Touch - certainly for younger kids. My 7 year old daughter wants one, and she's definitely too young for an iPhone - and at £1000+ a pop there's no way I'll be forking out for one of those any time soon!! - It still needs to retain the headphone jack, as Airpods are way too expensive and are certain to get lost with a 7 year old in charge. - Kids need access to cheap headphones (in my daughter's case - pink & fluffy) so they don't irritate everyone around them when using the device. Also - I don't like the idea of kids wearing earbuds, as they would likely get them lodged in their ears or pick up ear infections from sharing them with their friends. If Apple try to market an updated iPod touch at twice the price with no headphone jack, it will miss it's core audience by a mile.
Also, since USB-C Power Delivery is rated to deliver 100 watts of power, being able to block out unapproved cables is a really good thing. Sure, we’d all LOVE for this to be about consumer choice, but there are those among us that want to buy dirt cheap cables (to go with our $500 phones?) AND want someone else to pay if it burns down their house.Bingo! Apple won't give up the licensing revenue it makes by certifying accessories for iOS. It's the ONLY reason they are still clinging to Lightning.
Agreed. Even when the iPhone SE launched, that even pushed the iPod further into the darkness. The SE essentially is a 4 inch phone that had cellular and all the capabilities of the iPod. I just don’t see the investment for the iPod anymore for Apple, not when smart phones are the primary as you mentioned, and for what Apple charges for an iPod touch for a higher storage, you can find an iPhone for that price in good condition and have cellular if needed.
I’m completely open for the idea to Apple updating the iPod, I just don’t see the market for it as it once was, as it’s been so long already since its last refresh, does the consumer really care about a product like this when they’re smart phone meet all those expectations? And then factor the Apple Watch can now stream music directly to the AirPods as well, which the iOS was popular acting as a second device for streaming music.
Also, since USB-C Power Delivery is rated to deliver 100 watts of power, being able to block out unapproved cables is a really good thing. Sure, we’d all LOVE for this to be about consumer choice, but there are those among us that want to buy dirt cheap cables (to go with our $500 phones?) AND want someone else to pay if it burns down their house.
How dare apple give people options...Is the lack of innovation so bad at Apple that they need to release an obsolete product like the iPOD?
What is next, a new revamp of the old egg shapped iMacs in new colors??
What a joke...
How dare apple give people options...![]()
So an iPod touch is just an iPhone without cellular, right? That's the ONLY difference?
The watch "puck" you're talking about has a Type C plug on power supply side. The Watch Dock has a Lightning port, and I might even be willing to place a bet that AirPower has a Lightning port as well. I think the new wireless charging AirPods case has already been shown to retain the Lightning port.Just because older products don’t have it doesn’t mean newer products won’t. You can even buy Apple Watch charger from apple with USB C.
I can see air power coming with USB C and new air pods coming with the same.