TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️
Suspended
I hope we see a price decrease on Mac Pro with the way Apple is releasing its updated Silicon chips.
Last edited:
I am thankful for Apple creating the Mac Studio. Odds are it sells more than the Mac Pro.We're talking about an unreleased product but right now the architecture of the M1/M2 series does not support PCIe. I agree, if apple develops a computer to have upgradeable ram, storage and possibly GPUs, yes I agree completely.
My guess is that Mac Pro's not profitable enough for Apple to develop it at the pace of a MBA.While the M2 Pro Mac Mini is fine for my needs, I’m really wondering what’s happened to the Mac Pro development? What are the problems that Apple has run into and are seemingly unable to fix? There’s just something completely off about the lineup philosophy if the new Mac Pro can’t deliver a substantial upgrade to the Studio (either in terms of performance or in terms of upgradability).
Starting with the M3 line, Apple will rebrand the Mac Studio as "Mac Pro".
"It's the perfect plan", Tim Apple said. "Users will be willing to spend much more for the refresh, and we will be able to save by offering less features, pleasing shareholders".
The move is expected that the move will boost AAPL in 50%, because users will keep promoting the new MacStudioPro and defend Apple's every move.
Rumors are that Apple will release the new MacStudioPro as the "Mac Pro: Carbon-Neutral foot print edition", in accordance with their 2030 carbon-neutrality roadmap.
Mac Pro is just a Mac Studiowithwithout PCIe slots.
I'd wait at least half a decade or more before even considering VR.this article over at DF a couple days ago felt very insightful on Gurman with one headline.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2023/02/03/report-it-all
If that’s the case Apple should be releasing an updated iMac 🖥️.
Disappointing, but makes sense if they can’t meaningfully differentiate the SoC options. One or the other is going to be neglected by customers trying to max out with an Ultra, and a Pro mini is probably good enough for everyone else who doesn’t need the extra GPU of a Max.
A new version of the Mac Studio with the "M2 Ultra" chip is unlikely to arrive in the near future, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
![]()
In the latest edition of his "Power On" newsletter, Gurman explained that since the upcoming Apple silicon Mac Pro is "very similar functionality to the Mac Studio," Apple may wait until the release of M3- or M4-series chips to update the machine, or simply never refresh the device at all:To date, little has been rumored about the next-generation Mac Studio, so Gurman's latest remarks are the firmest indication yet that a new version of the machine is unlikely to arrive any time soon.
Last month, it emerged that Apple reportedly scaled back its plans for the first Apple silicon Mac Pro, scrapping the "M2 Extreme" chip and falling back on non-user-upgradable memory and the same design as the 2019 model. The device is now expected to offer the M2 Ultra only – a chip that would also have logically come to the next-generation Mac Studio.
The M2 Ultra chip is almost certain to double-up the capabilities of the recently introduced M2 Max chip, which is currently only available in the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro. With reduced modularity and similar performance on the upcoming Mac Pro, Apple's move to hold off on updating the Mac Studio's hardware may make sense until it can work out a better strategy for the machine's positioning going forward.
Article Link: Apple May Not Launch Updated Mac Studio With M2 Ultra Chip Due to Similarity With Upcoming Mac Pro
You mean a studio Ultra/Pro/Max for umpteen thousand dollars?Well it would be great, if apple could deliver the Studio Ultra at all.... waiting since 5 weeks...
likewise—my point in linking to it is that he seems to just report…anything and everything. it’s kind of shocking how regularly MR posts stuff from him (though, unless I missed something, they didn’t post this, much to their credit). his track record is is as all-over-the-place as a toddler’s scribbles. Kuo feels like the only reliable person left (but even he gets stuff wrong, I wouldn’t expect anyone to have a perfect track record).I'd wait at least half a decade or more before even considering VR.
Mac Studio was bought by Mac Pro users with no use for PCIe slots.So is the Studio is already redundant????
I agree. I hope Apple sees it also like that and that they will not abandon the Mac Studio. I would like them though to update the Mac Studio with the M2 Max & Ultra chips. German doesn't really know anything. He ist just suggesting the obvious. I wonder why people tend to listen to this guy..- Mac Mini - cheap, Mx/Mx Pro, limited in RAM, limited in ports, limited in cooling
- Mac Studio - medium priced, Mx Max/Mx Ultra, lots of ports and lots of cooling, lots of RAM
- Mac Pro - expensive, Mx ”Insane”, over the top with RAM, ports, cooling, and expansion opportunities
It’s not a difficult roadmap to follow and understand… even Kuo and Gurman understands it.
Apple sees no reason to have every generation of CPUs in every Mac line - it’s that simple, and it makes sense - there simply isn’t enough of a performance improvement to justify that.
I expect it to double to over $100k.I hope we see a price decrease on Max Pro with the way Apple is releasing its updated Silicon chips.
View attachment 2153891
Shut it down boys, this sums up any new threads on the Mac Pro until something new is actually said.The Mac Pro-related rumors have reached a state of chaos that is no longer useful or informative. At this point I'm tuning it all out and waiting for the release, and we'll see what they do.
I agree with this. An M2 Studio is more valuable than a half-assed Mac Pro.I don’t know. If I were Apple I would update the Mac Studio with M2 and just keep holding back the Mac Pro until I got that actually sorted out.