Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
jabooth

Ops! I should watch my typing mistakes. My English isn't perfect but it's better than that :)

And there is no argument here. Only friendly talk ;)

I really hope I'm not right about all my worries. I hope I will see Apple as aggressive and creative as they were last year.
 
I firmly believe in Nano updates to at least 6 GB in the high end. I now believe we'll see these before iPod AV or any other iPod updates, although it may be rolled out in addition to a new iPod. Why do I believe this?

http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Catalog(1166)-SanDisk_Sansa_e200_Series_MP3_Players.aspx

This sandisk flash player apparently can hold 6 GB with a expandibility slot for even more flash space, I now it won't even compete but I remember when the iPod Mini was updated to 6 Gigs of space in slew of a bunch of 5 GB players being released and the mini cost more and only offered 4 GB. So I wouldn't be suprised to see Apple match the 6 GB or maybe even offer a model as high as 8 GB, which depending on price would be awesome! Also, a analyst today said that if the 4 GB model dropped 50 bucks it would hit a very sweet spot much like the iPod Mini did about a year ago when the 4 GB version dropped to 199 and the 6 GB that was introduced at 249. After seeing this SanDisk player, and reading some articles/reports, I firmly believe we'll see this happen. Not that it'll be substantial, or huge news, but it'll be a good filler update definitely.

Continuing on, if they drop/cancel the shuffle line, we could see a 1 Gig Nano at 99/129, 2 Gig at 149, 4 gig at 199, and a 6 gig at 249. That would be pretty awesome to me at least, and would keep nano sales spurring on very well! We'll see, but this is my latest in predictions - I know it probably seems kind of underwhelming, possibly even common sense, but since not many have reinforced this thought - I thought I would and back it up a bit. You think so? I think so...:cool:
 
Separated At Birth

peharri said:
Well, you can always attach an external CD or DVD drive I guess. Actually, my major issues with the above spec would be more to do with the lack of networking. I think it should have 802.11 built-in, with Ethernet available as a USB or Firewire dongle.

They'd make great little home servers. In fact, if you sold them and also sold the 770-like device I've mentioned in the past (a "client" 802.11 device like the Nokia 770, with a web browser, able to access iTunes and iPhoto shared libraries, etc), you could probably change how we all use computers.

Of course, it'd be a little over-engineered for such a task. I wish I had a few million dollars, I'd put this kind of stuff in production.

Yes! Peharri, we must have been separated at birth because you and I consistently come up with the same ideas in these threads while others are cracking jokes about Chinese characters and Powerbook G5s. I fooled around with photoshop last week trying to come up with something I had envisioned, and that was an Apple set-top box that functioned mainly as a home internet and iLife server.

Obviously Apple has considered something like this as was evidenced by the recent comments concerning bringing functionality and media into the living room, but rather than develop a different box with limited computing features they chose to use the Mac Mini to meet the demand. Perhaps we are both a little ahead of the times, but I think something like this could be a hit.

Imagine a sleek black box with the glowing translucent Apple logo in the shape of a DVD player--wide, but not tall or too deep. The box includes:
*a wireless internet hub (802.11n/g);
*a Blu-ray drive;
*iLife software to pull up iTunes, iPhoto and access shared data from other machines via Bonjour;
*a 500 GB HDD to centrally store media files that is also accessible/updatable by a remote administrator via Bonjour;
*a firmware version of Front Row as the interface as you press "input" from the television remote.

What did I forget? I don't think the demand is out there yet, but as more content is available in the iTMS and the networking becomes more seamless between machines, Apple may have another product to market separately from the Mini. For now I can understand why Apple wants to get the Mini into as many homes as possible, but the above described device may be something that consumers would look at if the price is right. Ultimately, that's the problem with such a solution--how do you cut costs to make up for the expensive video card, blu-ray drive and hard disk? With the processor? I'm not sure.
 
boncellis said:
skip

Imagine a sleek black box with the glowing translucent Apple logo in the shape of a DVD player--wide, but not tall or too deep. The box includes:
*a wireless internet hub (802.11n/g);
*a Blu-ray drive;
*iLife software to pull up iTunes, iPhoto and access shared data from other machines via Bonjour;
*a 500 GB HDD to centrally store media files that is also accessible/updatable by a remote administrator via Bonjour;
*a firmware version of Front Row as the interface as you press "input" from the television remote.

skip

I really like this, just the iPod for the living room!:)
 
What's In A Name?

darh said:
I really like this, just the iPod for the living room!:)

You nailed it! I just don't know what the name would be--the iHome (that's been suggested several times), the HomePod...I wish I could think of something decent to call it.
 
boncellis said:
You nailed it! I just don't know what the name would be--the iHome (that's been suggested several times), the HomePod...I wish I could think of something decent to call it.

iMedia
MacMedia
iPod Media (hub)
Mac AV

hmm just doesnt sound right, does it?
 
darh said:
iMedia
MacMedia
iPod Media (hub)
Mac AV

hmm just doesnt sound right, does it?

It's slippery, certainly. Perhaps "iPod Home?" I give up.

You raise a larger point that is valid though, and that is that a lot of the described functionality may be included within the iPod itself, save the Blu-ray drive and the WiFi hub. Maybe that is what would deter Apple from developing something like this.

If it were me, I would get it immediately. It would be the perfect complement to the iPod in my living room.
 
boncellis said:
It's slippery, certainly. Perhaps "iPod Home?" I give up.

You raise a larger point that is valid though, and that is that a lot of the described functionality may be included within the iPod itself, save the Blu-ray drive and the WiFi hub. Maybe that is what would deter Apple from developing something like this.

If it were me, I would get it immediately. It would be the perfect complement to the iPod in my living room.

there is an other option though, you know the (fake?) iPod AV pics, if they can make that device, including a dock (dock attached to your tv and stereo) and you will be able to view a front-row menu on the tv right of your iPod. Built in wireless (in dock or iPod) for streaming from your mac/pc and a 100gb disk in it for recording perhaps?

but i still prefer the "dvd like" device actually
 
darh said:
there is an other option though, you know the (fake?) iPod AV pics, if they can make that device, including a dock (dock attached to your tv and stereo) and you will be able to view a front-row menu on the tv right of your iPod. Built in wireless (in dock or iPod) for streaming from your mac/pc and a 100gb disk in it for recording perhaps?

but i still prefer the "dvd like" device actually

I would prefer it too. Apple changed portable music players, could they change the home media receiver as well?
 
boncellis said:
I would prefer it too. Apple changed portable music players, could they change the home media receiver as well?

i tought is was on macrumors forums, but i'm not sure. Some one photoshopped a xServe so it was a media hub thing. With all the digital in and outputs. It looked great en nice design (the xserve already lookes nice!) but i can't find the picture any more.
 
boncellis said:
You nailed it! I just don't know what the name would be--the iHome (that's been suggested several times), the HomePod...I wish I could think of something decent to call it.

They really should call it iHome, even though the Elgato product is EyeHome. The "i" is just so Applely :rolleyes:
Son, it's time I tell you about the birds and the bees:
My iMac makes sweet love to my iPod which gives rise to iLife in our iHome
;)
 
MacinDoc said:
I'm thinking there will be a 13.3" model only, X1300 graphics (shouldn't add much to the cost), iSight, otherwise agree with you. Solo for $1099, Duo for $1299.

i do hope you are right! I will just not give $1299 for a notebook with intel integrated graphics, it´s just too bad!! I amagine running stuff as simple as Google Earth!!!!

Not my money!
 
A thought about the next media event

I think this media event coming up in late march early april has NOTHING to do with new hardware. I think its going to focus on the new Universal versions of Apple's professional media software like Final Cut Studio, Shake, Logic, etc. . I am thinking this for two reasons. 1) The media hype about the last apple press event was wrong and 2) apples website shows that the pro applications like the ones I listed already will be available by march 31st 2006. Coincidence? I think not

Has this idea already been posted? I'm new to all this.


- Sohrab
 
THis is what I'm hoping for on April 1.

112168027_9b0aad7bc7_m.jpg
 
IPhoto and Aperture

I don't sit in front of Photoshop and try to predict Apple future products. I need them now and I need them to be good for my work. A good surprise, I solved an IPhoto 6 issue. I posted about my problem before. It does not update one of my Iphoto5 libraries. This is rare, but it's a real problem if you work with images and don't want to install Iphoto 5 again. So I tried letting Aperture import the library, and it works fine. I know this is not a tech hint thread, but my point is, Apple is capable of making very reliable code in their pro applications, they should concentrate on improbing their iLive software reliability too. They could use the same import routines on all their software and solve most issues. My point is, Apple needs to focus on software and hardware quality again. I'm happy they do well with the iTunes store, but their OS X is fantastic and needs extended and unbroken commitment. Announcing speakers to journalists is fine, but that can't be their main focus. Without their reliable and user friendly OS, their IPods would not be as popular. Many people take IPods over other cheaper brands because Apple has such a great reputation in computing and user friendliness. Apple needs to do a lot more to seduce professionals, many of which use Windows for video and graphics now. Ten years ago, they were using only Macs. So yes Macs sell well, but Microsoft has been very active in seducing a target that was until recently reserved to Apple. Never sleep!
 
Surreal said:
wait...this event is only speculative right now?

I think Apple will send out an invitation as early as tomorrow or at the latest by early next week, depending on whether the event will take place the week before April 1st or the week after. Basically 2 weeks prior to the event.

I think the only thing holding the definite event date decision up is the negotiations with the movie studios for Apple's movie download service.

There's also the possibility that Apple may make the announcement on march 28th that there will be a special event on April 1st. They've done these pre-event announcements before.
 
puuukeey said:
I would imagine the only problem with typing on a flat surface is not being able to feel the keys.

still, I'm down for turning the lower half (between latch and keyboard) of my laptop into a touch screen. most definately the touch pad.


a link for anyone worried about not having any feedback with a touch screen...

http://www.alpine-usa.com/products/leading_technology/leading_tech_iva-d300.htm


im not sure i would want a touch screen only computer. it seems that the users arms would get tired quick.....a mouse uses less motion. remember tom cruise in minority report? he looked like he was practicing karate.
 

Attachments

  • demo_touch.jpg
    demo_touch.jpg
    12.2 KB · Views: 81
I have already posted this but i recieved no reply....please help! Will Microsoft Office for Mac work with Intel chips? Will it work on the new MacBook? Please respond! Anyone? I dont want to waste 100+ dollars on something that wont work! Thanks!
 
zack.williams said:
I have already posted this but i recieved no reply....please help! Will Microsoft Office for Mac work with Intel chips? Will it work on the new MacBook? Please respond! Anyone? I dont want to waste 100+ dollars on something that wont work! Thanks!

My guess is that it will run through Rosetta... Don't know how that would affect performance, though. Anyone else know?
 
zack.williams said:
I have already posted this but i recieved no reply....please help! Will Microsoft Office for Mac work with Intel chips? Will it work on the new MacBook? Please respond! Anyone? I dont want to waste 100+ dollars on something that wont work! Thanks!

It will definitely work, and I don't think you'll see that much of a performance drop with the Rosetta emulation. It may take a little extra time to open up Word or Excel, but once it gets going any loss in performance won't be substantial. I think you'll be happy with the new MBP!
 
Office for Mac

zack.williams said:
I have already posted this but i recieved no reply....please help! Will Microsoft Office for Mac work with Intel chips? Will it work on the new MacBook? Please respond! Anyone? I dont want to waste 100+ dollars on something that wont work! Thanks!


I use Office for Mac, it works through Rosetta. It is slower than on my PowerBook, but not much slower... It is worth the trade off for everything else to speed up.
 
So New G5 PowerBooks next tuesday?

But seriously I can't wait to see what Apple does to the iBook, I live in anticipation for an Intel iBook (or MacBook?).
 
This should be interesting, and the prices will be interesting to see. To be a viable solution for schools they will need to keep the price down on their low end MacBook. That means not going over $1000 on the low end (so it would be like $899 for the schools with the education discount). Of course there need to be a high end model to, this would be nice, because then Apple wouldn't have to worry about a 12-inch MBP, and rather could just have the High-End 13inch MacBook, and as others have pointed out they would like this too.

I graduate this year, but it will be interesting to see what my school gets in means of new technology. I think are Mobile lab is about ready to be replaced, currently we have 12-inch iBook G3's. Talk is those will be going to PC machines (I am glad I won't be around). However, we will retain our Mac Lab in the High School for sure, currently we have G3 iMacs, there is talk of getting Intel iMacs. Of course I won't be around to enjoy them.

Maybe my Apple loving computer teacher will be able to get another Apple Mobile Lab with the MacBooks. But I highly doubt it. Our school likes buying cheap computers, times are not like they used to be.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.