Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have to ask: Why do you need an Apple Music sub for this? This is just classical music, music that is free since classical music is public domain. So why should you need a subscription just to listen to public domain music you can get for free from archive.org?
The sheet music is public domain. The recordings often are not because (shocker) people had to perform and record and publish it and need to get paid to, you know, live.

If you see classical music as a generic commodity where any recording is interchangable with any other, I guess it doesn't matter to you and you'll do fine on archive.org.
 
Last edited:
I have to ask: Why do you need an Apple Music sub for this? This is just classical music, music that is free since classical music is public domain. So why should you need a subscription just to listen to public domain music you can get for free from archive.org?
Well, 1. because they developed an app for you and aren't going to give you free access 2. you're using their infrastructure. But more importantly, 3. while I'm not a copyright lawyer there's a difference between the copyright on a certain piece of music and the actual performance of that piece -- which might not have expired yet.
 
Most genres of music are simple, you’re just listening to a song by an artist.
if you’re listening to “Hey Jude” by The Beatles, you’re just simply listening to “Hey Jude” by The Beatles.
with classical music its a lot different.
Who composed it? Who arranged it? Who produced it? Who performed it? where was it performed?
tagging is different, the way things are arranged is different, its not just traditional singles, EPs and LPs.
I don't know as much about classical as I'd like, and I'm hoping this will have some tools that help me follow a thread if I find something I want to hear more of.
 
I want Apple to update the Apple Music Classic App icon. Retro style, something like this maybe? The new icon is too modern for this App. Not so classical! 🎵🎼

FUHKcU8VUAAp4qH
 
Why does this need to be a separate app? It's all just music... 🤷‍♂️
Consider recordings of the same composition by the same orchestra with different conductors, or of the same opera with the same stars and different orchestras, or the same conductor with the same orchestra and different soloists.

For a simpler example of how search and repertoire should be suited to each other, compare looking for all the cover versions of pop songs in multiple languages using secondhandsings with trying to do it using Apple Music.
 
iPhone only, huh? I use my DragonFly Cobalt DAC thru the USB-C port on my iPad mini 6 and it already sounds great, I was really looking forward to using the stand-alone Classical app there but oh well... also no MacOS version. Dang.
 
Consider recordings of the same composition by the same orchestra with different conductors, or of the same opera with the same stars and different orchestras, or the same conductor with the same orchestra and different soloists.

For a simpler example of how search and repertoire should be suited to each other, compare looking for all the cover versions of pop songs in multiple languages using secondhandsings with trying to do it using Apple Music.

Yes, but it seems they could've just improved Apple Music.

Qobuz handles classical music very well, yet it also has other genres.
 
I have to ask: Why do you need an Apple Music sub for this? This is just classical music, music that is free since classical music is public domain. So why should you need a subscription just to listen to public domain music you can get for free from archive.org?

The copyright on the composition is different than the copyright on the performance.

Think of the same thing in books: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte is in the public domain because it was first published in 1847. The text is out of copyright and can be downloaded, for free, from a variety of sources. If I walk into a bookstore, however, the Penguin Classics version of Jane Eyre is not free. It is a new product, compiled and published by Penguin and covered by copyright as of its publication date. You can choose to buy their version, or you can choose to download a free version.
 
Searching for classical pieces is way different than for modern music, with composers being much more important, more artists per piece (with solists) and other numbering compared to albums. Plus it also has it's own coding system with certain codes meaning certain pieces of music. Cluttering the normal music app to get all that in a coherent system is not really feasible.

Works great to have a combined interface in Roon for all genres. Of course it's possible.
 
Can't wait. This is the first new first-party app or hardware I've been excited about since Apple Watch.

Apple have the ability to really do this well. I hope it includes good introductions and overviews on each composer.

In the UK, BBC Radio 3 is amazing for classical music - they also do a 'composer of the week' where they'll give you the history and circumstances of a particular composers life, their motivations etc. and really direct their music.

So good to see Apple doing something the 'high art' space. Especially as 'Apple Music 1' feels like it's not catering to the likes of me.
 
At no additional cost for Apple Music subscribers! That's huge!

And please, let's not have that discussion again on why a separate app for a music genre. If you don't understand why classical music needs a separate app, you most likely know nothing about classical music and this is just not for you.
 
I have to ask: Why do you need an Apple Music sub for this? This is just classical music, music that is free since classical music is public domain. So why should you need a subscription just to listen to public domain music you can get for free from archive.org?

so you can see the lyrics and use the sing-along feature. :D
/jk
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.