Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't really understand why this has to be a separate app. What if someone likes both classical music and modern music? Do they have to jump between apps then?
I don't listen exclusively to classical, and having a separate application is *totally* not a problem for me. Different interface for a different use case.

[Edit] I've been trying to make classical work in the Apple environment since my first iPod in 2003. And the only way to do it is to spend countless hours curating your metadata for consistency. As someone mentioned earlier, the metadata you get from Apple has a nasty tendency to file *some* "Ludwig van Beethoven" under "L" and *some* under "B". It's always on the barest edge of usability, and even then only if you've got the time to polish up the metadata.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
What I see in these comments is a general unwillingness to read anything beyond a headline; most people's utter lack of knowledge about Western art music (which continues to be written, by the way, it's not just something "in the past"); near-total ignorance about copyright law; and an enthusiasm for showing off one's lack of comprehension to the world as if it redounds to one's credit. Truly depressing.

Good for Apple for seeing a need and doing something about it. If it's successful, perhaps they can take what they've developed and apply it retroactively to the rest of Apple Music, which has always had a metadata and organization problem.
 
But the performances and recordings are public domain as well. You can get them right now on Archive.org
You really have no clue how this works do you?

Please point me to this recording on archive.org…

8717306260671-e1677862413624.jpg
 
What I see in these comments is a general unwillingness to read anything beyond a headline; most people's utter lack of knowledge about Western art music (which continues to be written, by the way, it's not just something "in the past"); near-total ignorance about copyright law; and an enthusiasm for showing off one's lack of comprehension to the world as if it redounds to one's credit. Truly depressing.

Good for Apple for seeing a need and doing something about it. If it's successful, perhaps they can take what they've developed and apply it retroactively to the rest of Apple Music, which has always had a metadata and organization problem.
Out of interest, what do you think are the problems with the metadata on pop music? I used to be an obsessive id3 tagger. Now I pretty much exclusively use streaming services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcaleb
It wasn't stated in this MR article, but elsewhere it's said "Those tracks will feature the highest audio quality (up to 192 kHz/24 bit Hi-Res Lossless) with thousands of recordings in immersive spatial audio."

If it's iPhone-only, how does one get such a high quality stream to equipment capable of reproducing it? Lightning port? 🤣
 
I'm always excited for something new from Apple. Question I ask; will the app be truly just about classical music, or will there be cross ads and references to other genres ... and what happens to the "regular" Music app, no more classical section?
 
It wasn't stated in this MR article, but elsewhere it's said "Those tracks will feature the highest audio quality (up to 192 kHz/24 bit Hi-Res Lossless) with thousands of recordings in immersive spatial audio."

If it's iPhone-only, how does one get such a high quality stream to equipment capable of reproducing it? Lightning port? 🤣

Also, I don't mean to be "that guy", but spatial audio is a gimmick and I've found it doesn't sound very good with classical music. Classical music is best without audio gimmicks: two stereo channels, nothing more. Especially since many classical recordings are older. It isn't like pop music where you can get away with listening to music exclusively produced in the last decade.
 
It isn't.
Yes it is. Because the sound quality of newer mobile phones is lower than a decent sound card.
Moreover, there are no iOS devices that can be connected to the mixer without an adapter.
An iOS device can only be a remote control desk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kimmo
Around New Year's I splashed on a box set of about 120 recordings the guy in my avatar made for Deutsche Grammophon. I still haven't ripped them to put them into my iTunes library, because I haven't talked myself into the many, many hours of metadata editing I'd need to do to make it work.

I haven't subscribed to Apple Music because its preference for its own crap metadata over my curated metadata simply makes classical unusable until I sign out.

I think the cure might finally be in sight.
 


Apple's long-awaited dedicated classical music app today appeared on the App Store and is available for pre-order ahead of its launch at the end of March.

Apple-Music-Classical-App-Store-Feature-2.jpg

In 2021, Apple announced that it had purchased the classical music streaming service Primephonic and would be folding it into Apple Music via a new app dedicated to the genre. "Apple Music Classical" is now on the App Store and expected to be released on March 28, 2023. Users can pre-order the app now so that it downloads as soon as it is available. It is included for free as part of an Apple Music or Apple One subscription.

Speaking to TechCrunch, Apple said that the new Apple Music Classical app offers Apple Music subscribers access to over five million classical music tracks, including new high-quality releases, in addition to hundreds of curated playlists, thousands of exclusive albums, and other features like composer bios and deep dives on key works.

The app offers a simpler interface for interacting with classical music specifically. Unlike the existing Apple Music app, Apple Music Classical allows users to search by composer, work, conductor, catalog number, and more. Users can get more detailed information from editorial notes and descriptions.

apple-music-classical-screenshots.jpg

Apple commissioned high-resolution digital portraits of famous composers like Ludwig van Beethoven, Frédéric Chopin, and Johann Sebastian Bach for the app, using color palettes and artistic references from the relevant classical period, with more unique artwork to be added over time. Apple says that it has been working with classical music artists and institutions to offer exclusive content and recordings.

Apple Music Classical will only support iOS devices running iOS 15.4 or newer at launch. A version of the app for Android is also set to arrive "soon." Users can track news and updates about the Apple Music Classical on the new @appleclassical Twitter account.

Article Link: Apple Music Classical Now Available for Pre-Order on the App Store, Launches Later This Month
Lots of fairly stupid reactions from people who have no knowledge whatsoever of classical music and have been too lazy to read what Apple has said about the necessity to have a separate app for classical music.
 
But the performances and recordings are public domain as well. You can get them right now on Archive.org
In Dolby Atmos? Spatial audio? I just tried to find what I was listening to this morning on archive.org: Silvestrov: Silent Songs by Helene Grimaud & Konstantin Krimmel. Archive.org has Silvestrov: Silent Songs, but not the newly released Helene Grimaud & Konstantin Krimmel version.
 
It wasn't stated in this MR article, but elsewhere it's said "Those tracks will feature the highest audio quality (up to 192 kHz/24 bit Hi-Res Lossless) with thousands of recordings in immersive spatial audio."

If it's iPhone-only, how does one get such a high quality stream to equipment capable of reproducing it? Lightning port? 🤣
Wifi? And lightning port indeed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.