Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This makes a lot of sense to me. They want to make more money from services, and they can’t expand services if they limit them to their own expensive hardware. They can get more subscribers, and if they release a more affordable HomePod in the future, some of those subscribers might buy that.
Apple has an active installed base of over 1.3 billion, and those users of “expensive” hardware are more likely to subscribe to services.
 
Sending imessages, answering and making calls, finding your iPhone, tablet or Apple Watch, reading your notifications. Controlling your Apple TV. All stiff the HomePod can do that
Alexa and the google home can’t do.
All that is neat if you live alone, but it can only be tied to one account, right?

I can do the Apple stuff from my iPhone, iPad, or watch. At our house, the Alexa devices (we have 4 because they're cheap and handy) are used by the whole family, including visiting kids, mostly for playing music. This new integration makes my personal Apple Music a lot more useful to me, and now I can let my Amazon music subscription lapse.

We also pay for a family subscription to Google Music for ad-free YouTube and streaming music on many devices. I dislike the silo effect of keeping subscriptions tied to particular devices and am glad to see Apple opening up. It's definitely in their interest, just like when Microsoft went all in on mobile apps for iOS and Android rather than keeping everything on the dead Windows Phone platform.

It occurs to me that having 3 music subscriptions cost as much as a HomePod purchase, but it goes to show that convenience and content tops sound quality, at least for me.
 
I love my dots, but I find Amazon’s implementation of third party commands annoying. Why would I need to say “Alexa, play music by Ed Sheeran on Apple Music” when Alexa already knows what music services I subscribe to. I should be able to say “Alexa, play Ed Sheeran” and she should sync each platform and either ask me which one she should use, or she should mix streaming songs from different platforms.

I got a dot for Destiny 2, and the extra commands made making requests a chore. I expect music playback to be even simpler.
 
Apple has an active installed user base of 1.3 billion.

Netflix only has 148 million subscribers worldwide. Apple doesn’t have to open up.

Apple’s customers are loyal, unlike most other brands, where customers might be loyal to the os but not a specific manufacturer.

Also, Apple’s customers tend to be the type who buy software and subscription services.

Amazon only has around 100 million Prime subscribers, so it is interesting to see Apple partner with such a small player.
[doublepost=1544880814][/doublepost]
I can’t airplay to it, so what good is that?

I am not following your logic, based on your numbers . Given the huge installation base of 1.3 billion , 40 million Apple Music subscribers is insignificant, and in no way does it show Apple users are loyal to Apple when it comes to services.

You may find that, given Apple is partnering with amazon for thier insignificant 100 million , suggest that 1.3 billion means very little. Why partner with such a small player if you have 1.3 billion user....... Apple Music can help you answer that question, even with such a huge installation base and AM notification and free trials, Spotify is still ahead . You would be shocked how many of those 1.3 billion use Spotify actuallly .

Please feel free to provide facts to support Apple users are loyal to Apple services cause they own an Apple product .
 
  • Like
Reactions: timber and Rob_2811
Realistically, no. Removing Siri would be a huge disaster. You probably don't know that Siri is the main user interface to HomePod, and it works extremely well for cuing up music.
No it doesn’t.
What makes HomePod great is it's always on, and always ready to play music with only a verbal command. even from 20 feet away with HomePod playing music loudly. An amazing feat and superb underlying technology to pull that off.
Alexa is the same, only better. If it wasn’t for privacy, there would be no argument for Siri anymore!
I've had my HomePod for almost a year now and it's a delight to use - every single day. From your post suggesting Siri should be removed, I suspect you've never owned one.
I also own one and the experience is poor. I feel I have to repeat my orders more and more to make Siri react. I also have to talk louder as well. And if Siri reacts, the hit rate is 50-70% at best - for music! Siri is simply a poor assistant, especially compared to Alexa.

If privacy wasn’t important to me, I would have several Echos around the house already and the HomePod would have been sold. Not sure I’m not caving in some time in the future, though.
 
I am not following your logic, based on your numbers . Given the huge installation base of 1.3 billion , 40 million Apple Music subscribers is insignificant, and in no way does it show Apple users are loyal to Apple when it comes to services.

You may find that, given Apple is partnering with amazon for thier insignificant 100 million , suggest that 1.3 billion means very little. Why partner with such a small player if you have 1.3 billion user....... Apple Music can help you answer that question, even with such a huge installation base and AM notification and free trials, Spotify is still ahead . You would be shocked how many of those 1.3 billion use Spotify actuallly .

Please feel free to provide facts to support Apple users are loyal to Apple services cause they own an Apple product .

Exactly.

The 1.3 billion active devices is a meaningless marketing soundbite , there is no context when it comes to users buying into Apple services. How many of those devices are 'hand me down' devices given to children, and how much cash are those children dropping on iCloud storage and Apple Music subscriptions?

Look at this Echo situation, what is the point in having over a billion active users when you cant get your services in front of them?

AM has taken three years to offer some presence on non Apple devices outside of smartphone apps, we finally see some and its US only. Spotify have had TV streaming apps and smart speaker support for years at this point, even Tidal is more pervasive.

I've been using AM for a while now because I have some issues with Spotifys business model but its becoming difficult to justify a service that I can only use on my phone. I'll probably go back to Spotify soon.
 
Anyone else struggling with multi-room audio? I have an Apple Music family plan subscription but every time I try to play across multiple rooms, Alexa apologizes and says she can’t do that. When I try the same through Amazon Music, it works.
 
Goodbye homepod?
This doesn’t replace HomePod for me however it’s nice being able to use Apple Music on the cheap echo dots in rooms beside my living room
[doublepost=1544885752][/doublepost]
Sonos has a decade lead on HomePod so that makes sense but Spotify also had a giant lead on Apple Music but not anymore. I think Sonos will die or more likely be acquired by a big tech company in a few years.
I refuse to invest in Sonos until they offer Dolby Atmos. My current home audio equipment works perfectly find until there is a valid reason to upgrade
 
This is great news - I was going back and forth between a couple Sonos Ones and a HomePod, but this made the decision for me. Alexa beats Siri any time.
 
Is apple basically saying the homepod will not compete with Amazon / Google.

I don't get Cooks strategy for apple, seems to be throw everying at the wall that makes a profit and see what sticks.

You don't protect your brand by just chasing profits . While I'm happy with his news as an Alexa owner, I'm disappointed
Most likely Apple isn’t going to compete with the cheaper echo spot more people own those then the bigger more expensive echo
 
While this is possible, I think majority of consumers might still prefer integrated solutions. They won't be thinking "I will buy these two products separately and hook them up together", unless they already had the speaker from before. It's going to be 1 vs 1. Echo vs HomePod.

That said, the HomePod seems to be doing well enough at its current $250 discounted price that maybe Apple is taking notes and we might see an updated version at a lower price.

You can buy a speaker which is on par with the HomePod for cheaper than what Apple is asking for. And one that integrates a better Assisstant such as Google and Alexa. So to say that ppl looking for a good speaker doesn’t care about the assistant feature is silly.
 
What makes Amazon Echo with a couple of cheap external amplified speakers great is it's always on, and always ready to play music with only a verbal command. even from 20 feet away with Amazon Echo with a couple of cheap external amplified speakers playing music loudly. An amazing feat and superb underlying technology to pull that off.
I own 3 echo spots and not a single one is unconnected to good speakers or even used to play music seriously. My home theatre is connected to an Apple TV. I have a great soundbar in the bedroom connected to another Apple TV as well as own a HomePod. Echo doesn’t offer any Airplay options let alone AirPlay 2.
[doublepost=1544886193][/doublepost]
Apple buys the app from a developer and literally sits on it for years and treats it like some toy or novelty. You can’t honestly say it works as well as Alexa.

HomePod is a great speaker, but it is no personal assistant.

The one place it shines over Alexa is the apparent steadfast position Apple has taken on privacy.
It does everything I need it to do and is the only assistant that can send information to all of my Apple devices
 
Awesome! Now I definitely want to go buy some Echos because the Sonos One has been catching my eye, when I played with one at the AirBNB we stayed at.
[doublepost=1544830905][/doublepost]
If you turned on your iCloud music library, and uploaded your songs to Apple Music, they're all there and completely playable. I have Cambodian music on my Apple Music and it works just fine through things like HomePod....Just good luck pronouncing them for Siri to pick it up.
So is that both services you have to pay for? I'm in Europe anyway just getting prepared for the launch.
 
No it doesn’t.

Alexa is the same, only better. If it wasn’t for privacy, there would be no argument for Siri anymore!

I also own one and the experience is poor. I feel I have to repeat my orders more and more to make Siri react. I also have to talk louder as well. And if Siri reacts, the hit rate is 50-70% at best - for music! Siri is simply a poor assistant, especially compared to Alexa.

If privacy wasn’t important to me, I would have several Echos around the house already and the HomePod would have been sold. Not sure I’m not caving in some time in the future, though.
I own a HomePod and several echo dots. I never actually play music on the dots and anytime I’ve tried I can’t yell over commands at them while music is on. Meanwhile I can blast music full volume on HomePod and sori can still hear my voice commands from across the room
[doublepost=1544886941][/doublepost]
A music is a huge revenue bringer, and seems to make profit too. To push its relevance it needs to expand and be available everywhere. No music label is interested to only sell to the 20 percent apple crowd.
Apples closed environment was always a failure on the long run. One of the areas steve was wrong and too short sighted.
Nowadays apple is not good enough anymore to deliver a significant better experience than others, because they have copied apples success patterns.

Apples strategy must becoming a major player on the whole market when it goes to digital services. With devices it should stay with its strategy of high integration between devices, but that doesn’t work anymore too.
A watch MUST become independent from iPhone - this tight integration is the same old and wrong strategy they tried with iTunes and iPhones.
Steve i guess would have figured that out by now .. maybe!
Yet the Apple Watch dominates the wearable market and is disrupting the traditional watch market.
 
Don’t have a HomePod, but I do have an echo.... Even though I want a HomePod, I’m content with Alexa... but if you’re going to permit Apple Music, I’d like Apple to release some for of API for iCloud functionality (iCal, reminders, notes) for the Alexa as well... google calendar sucks
Alexa can add things to your iCloud Calendar. You just have to change the default Calendar to the iCloud one.
 
Last edited:
Just because you have an issue doesn’t mean it’s a buggy launch. Means you are the issue

Great deduction, Sherlock...

No, actually, it could mean that the specific device I'm running the Alexa app on along with even possibly a combination of another app being installed or running in the background could be the issue. Or the combination of the Echo devices that I have grouped - who knows. Everyone's setup is different and it's a good likelihood that the development team didn't sleuth out all issues yet.
 
Can anyone confirm how many Echo devices can simultaneously stream Apple Music? Amazon Music Unlimited only lets me stream from one device at a time, which is pretty lame when my kids are listening in their room and I want to listen elsewhere.

If you have an Amazon Music family subscription, you can stream from multiple devices - we do this all the time in our household!
[doublepost=1544889191][/doublepost]Uh, what about the UK?
 
I asked for a source because it was originally stated Apple Music had 40 million subscribers.

At 50 million, the source from way back in May is 25% higher than what was claimed.

I can understand the confusion, since Spotify is growing at a monthly rate of only 2%, while Apple's growth rate is 5%.

That’s why even though Spotify was founded in 2006, Apple Music launched only 3 years ago and overtook Spotify in the US for paying subscribers this summer.

Obviously the 50 million number is outdated considering Apple Music’s growth rate, so it will be interesting to see if Apple announces an updated figure during the next earnings call.
 
I love my dots, but I find Amazon’s implementation of third party commands annoying. Why would I need to say “Alexa, play music by Ed Sheeran on Apple Music” when Alexa already knows what music services I subscribe to. I should be able to say “Alexa, play Ed Sheeran” and she should sync each platform and either ask me which one she should use, or she should mix streaming songs from different platforms.

I got a dot for Destiny 2, and the extra commands made making requests a chore. I expect music playback to be even simpler.
That is why they have a "Default" music service in settings, where you don't have to *name* which service you want to use unless it's one other than the default.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flojomojo
I asked for a source because it was originally stated Apple Music had 40 million subscribers.

At 50 million, the source from way back in May is 25% higher than what was claimed.

I can understand the confusion, since Spotify is growing at a monthly rate of only 2%, while Apple's growth rate is 5%.

That’s why even though Spotify was founded in 2006, Apple Music launched 3 only years ago, and overtook Spotify in the US for paying subscribers this summer.

Obviously the 50 million number is outdated considering Apple Music’s growth rate, so it will be interesting to see if Apple announces an updated figure during the next earnings call.

Firstly I didn't state anything, @Shiro_Simba did. That 50 million figure also includes 8 million on free trials so 42 million paid users, hardly a million miles out is it? For context Spotify had 191 million monthly active users including their free users so lot of potential for growth there too.

Yes Apple Musics numbers are probably higher now but im sure Spotifys are too unless you think they haven't added any subscribers since the summer. Granted Apple growing theirs marginally faster and yes Apple Music is doing well in a market where the iPhone accounts for nearly 50%.

Your point was that because Apple 1.3 billion install base they don't need to worry about other platforms, in three years they've only convinced 40 million of them to pay for Apple Music.


EDIT: Spotify is at 87 million paid as of 1st November '18
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shiro_Simba
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.