Not getting my hopes up as of yet because I'm waiting for the other shoe to the drop in terms of whatever Apple might do to limit the usability of this feature.
The question I have is will I be able to buy Hi-Res Lossless from the iTunes store, or will it all be just an Apple music thing?
You don't have Atmos music from most sources as a FYI. Music concerts that are available on Blu-ray are rare to utilize Atmos. Try listening to Hans Zimmer: Live in Prague as it uses Dolby Atmos.I wouldn't be shocked if you can also enjoy Atmos music through an Apple TV 4K hooked up to an Atmos sound system.
Can the bandwidth of say, the Airpods Pro even handle lossless codec bitrate? Is this just going to be for people using Lightning port headphones and or Macs with sound outputting via the headphone jack?
Are you kidding? On good gear, the sound difference is not only obvious but revelatory.Variable 256 AAC is about as transparent as it gets. Pushing bits for marketing isn't good.
Are you kidding? On good gear, the sound difference is not only obvious but revelatory.
What I’m most impressed by is that Apple have not chosen to introduce a higher price tier for this and I’m glad.
If it costs extra there will be tears.I wonder if this will be a separate tear of Apple Music that costs extra....
It cost extra everywhere else. Don’t expect Apple to be generous.If it costs extra there will be tears.
Eye C what U did there.I hope I don’t get too much flac for this but you’ll need Atmos some good headphones or speakers for this.
The question I have is will I be able to buy Hi-Res Lossless from the iTunes store, or will it all be just an Apple music thing?
They tend to reinvent it. They tend to work on concepts and new products for years with tons of patents as evidence. Many competitors use these and leaks to figure out what Apple is up to and try to beat them to market. Then Apple releases theirs much later when it achieves what they intended usually with new technology they’ve created and it blows everyone out of the water. The competition say it will never work and will fail before switching to a copy a year or two later."Music is About to Change Forever" ???
As usual, Apple loves to take someone else's idea and "invent" it. There's been several streaming services with lossless hi-res audio for some time now -- including Amazon.
I feel it will be sold exactly like with upgrading movies to 4K: without changing the pricesI wonder if this will be a separate tear of Apple Music that costs extra....
Qobuz is $14.99/mon and that includes 24/192 FLAC. What's more, Roon supports Qobuz integration, and I don't see Apple opening up an API for Roon integration, so unless Apple makes the 24/192 streams available at the $9.99 price point there are already well-placed competitors in the Hifi market (where hires matters) doing a great job. Personally, I don't care about AppleTV integration, etc. I play hires streams on a high-end hifi system, and I just don't see myself embracing Apple for it.I don't think this is happening (sort of) as there are two "lossless" codecs being referenced in the leaked code: 24-bit/48kHz and 24-bit/192kHz. It's more than likely the existing Apple Music tier will get the basic "Apple Lossless" 48kHz option whereas the better "Hi-Res Lossless" 192kHz will be reserved for a more expensive tier and only certain albums will get that option.
It's more than likely the existing Apple Music tier will get the basic "Apple Lossless" 48kHz option whereas the better "Hi-Res Lossless" 192kHz will be reserved for a more expensive tier and only certain albums will get that option.
That's what I fear, or preparing myself for.It cost extra everywhere else. Don’t expect Apple to be generous.
I so want to see this to happen. Used to use Roon long time ago, gave up for Apple Music. Now if I can go back I would be delighted.What's more, Roon supports Qobuz integration, and I don't see Apple opening up an API for Roon integration