In essence you pay Apple a $5 per month premium for a GUI.
But it can only learn if you can correct it somehow, i.e. via typing, which this plan forbids.Purely subjective, though. And the more Siri gets used, the better it gets (supposedly). Machine learning is called "learning" for a reason.... it learns over time. So logic stands that this is a smart move, as it encourages more people to interact with Apple Music by voice thereby improving the overall service.
True, but Siri can only get better if its mistakes get corrected, and with a "voice only" plan, there is no way to correct it, since you can't type in the title and artist you wanted. Unless they do make it that you can type, but only after you've attempted to Siri it.They're probably trying to drive Siri usage, because the only way Siri gets better is by getting more data (ie: usage). And that sort of data is hard (impossible) to get in bulk.
This has been my problem for awhile with different music services, they'll give me the same 100 songs or so.If suggestions are based purely on your music preference, then there's probably very little chance for the user to discover new music.
That's dumb.
Poor strategic move. Siri has about 40% strike rate in getting songs right which is bad enough. Not having a way of choosing via Music will just result in a frustrated customer. On the hook, but then will leave never to return. Shame.
You can also tell Siri to respond silently via text by going into settings -> siri -> siri responses and switching spoken responses to "Only with 'hey siri'".Place your hand over the bottom of the phone and it should be quieter. I frequently do that in case the volume is up high when I'm laying in bed.
It will like fart can mufflersHow does this reduce the overall amount of noise in the world?
Facebook is doing this by using their Viewpoints app. The app is where they have various tasks you can do for cash. Usually takes maybe 5 minutes for $5 and usually there are 2-4 parts (each paying that amount). In recent months they've had you say a number of phrases that involve names and commands. Clearly they're using the data to train their voice assistant. They've also had ones where you see a marketplace ad and then two photos and choose which one is the closest match, clearly training a visual AI to compare images. Seems a good way for them to get the data they need in bulk quickly.They're probably trying to drive Siri usage, because the only way Siri gets better is by getting more data (ie: usage). And that sort of data is hard (impossible) to get in bulk.
We have several HomePods/HomePods Mini, and we can set the music volume separately from the command/voice volume.I already have the family plan but something that comes to mind is Siri volume. If I am someplace I cannot interact with her loudly I might whisper a command but she replies at whatever volume my phone is at. Ha. I wish she could pick up on the volume at which I ask for something and reply with a similar level. Of course an off/on setting for those that dont want that.
Well there is that, but you also can learn from attempts at voice correction. I do that all the time with alexa - play "blah". "Play blah blah" "play blah blah blah." Lots of play commands in a row generally means a bad interpretation. At some point I just give up, but I'll try to get the thing I want two or three times.True, but Siri can only get better if its mistakes get corrected, and with a "voice only" plan, there is no way to correct it, since you can't type in the title and artist you wanted. Unless they do make it that you can type, but only after you've attempted to Siri it.
Yeah keep trying @coolfactor. Siri not only sucks it is suckier than it was 5 years ago. I actually have it turned off on two devices. Apple better be careful with this IMHO.Purely subjective, though. And the more Siri gets used, the better it gets (supposedly). Machine learning is called "learning" for a reason.... it learns over time. So logic stands that this is a smart move, as it encourages more people to interact with Apple Music by voice thereby improving the overall service.
Selling selections of any inventory gets money from audiences. FTFY LOLEducating and providing curated selections of any art form educates and enlightens audiences. Forcing users to request only the artists who's names and titles they already know sounds like the absolute worst way provide access to any art or media. Users knowledge and understanding of music will drastically narrow the more they use this 'service'.
Here's my snarky comment: Spotify is by far the best streaming service out there. Ease of use, great suggestions, better UI UX etc...Remember: if you have a snarky comment about this, it was not and is not for you.
How does this reduce the overall amount of noise in the world?
LolThey're probably trying to drive Siri usage, because the only way Siri gets better is by getting more data (ie: usage). And that sort of data is hard (impossible) to get in bulk.