Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This could work, if Siri was usable. But as it stands now, this is 90 million more reasons for Siri to mess things up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nortonandreev
Not even Amazon, the king of value, can make that work.

Amazon charges $3.99/month for a single device plan. That's right. It's not even free for Amazon Prime subscribers. This plan is also more limited than $4.99/month Apple Music Voice plan in that only one device can be paired with it, limited to Echo or Fire TV. While Apple Music Voice is also limited to a single stream (just like Apple Music Individual), it can be paired with many Apple devices at once.

And yes, the article points out that Apple is offering a 7-day trial.
Amazon has free music streaming included in Amazon Prime membership. It also has a pay streaming service with a more expansive library.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agoodpub
This music voice plan should have been FREE since Siri is doing all the magic. I’m not sure why Apple is even charging a service fee for this.

We are already paying for Apple Music Service Fee. Paying for a small feature extra makes no sense. ??‍♀️

Is there even a free trial for this?

Well of course. Everything should be FREE!
 
It seems very odd to deliberately remove functionality from the iOS Music app and force you to use your voice. Very weird diversion from the most natural approach in that setting. I thought Apple’s philosophy was to make the human-machine interaction as natural as possible in any given context?
Wait - what? Right there, in the very first sentence of the article, it indicates that this no more than "a new low-price subscription tier for Apple Music." Said another way: if you are a Music subscriber, there is nothing at all to see here. Move along. Continue using Music as you always have.

Regardless, it's all prep for a point in the [very] near future (I'm looking at you, AR/VR) where voice becomes the default (and preferred?) way to interface with your hardware/software. Inevitable.
 
Aside from CSAM scanning this has to be the most stupidly thought out thing Apple have ever done. The fact they’ve made these things so close together in time suggests the people making the decisions about these things need replacing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nortonandreev
It is almost like people on here do not understand what this is. It is a LOWER COST TIER of apple music that has less functionality and can only be interfaced through Siri. It is not an add on. Regular apple music has all of this already, plus the app interface.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agoodpub
Apple needs to get back to personifying technology. When I saw that image in the article, I immediately imagined the AirPods peeking out of the case and looking around. Remember the old iMac commercial where it followed the window shopper's movements?
 
Apple is paying you to use Siri. Regular music plan is $10
I wouldn’t use Siri even if they paid me. Or Alexa. It’s all over-engineered. I don’t need a computer to tell me when to take a cr@p or “suggest“ music or movies or anything else. It all just gets in the way. Remember how computers on the Boeing 737 Max “suggested” that the pilot go into a steep nose dive? Give humans control of their machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki
I wouldn’t use Siri even if they paid me. Or Alexa. It’s all over-engineered. I don’t need a computer to tell me when to take a cr@p or “suggest“ music or movies or anything else. It all just gets in the way. Remember how computers on the Boeing 737 Max “suggested” that the pilot go into a steep nose dive? Give humans control of their machines.
If Siri is telling you when to take a bowel movement, you might not be talking to Siri
 
My guess is this is a way for Apple to entice more people to use Siri more so they can improve its algorithm and accuracy to better compete with Amazon and Google AI.
It's a direct answer to Amazon's plan where you pay $4/mo to get music streaming on one Echo. For a casual listener with (perhaps just) a HomePod mini, its a cheap(er) way to stream music. They released it going into a holiday season where some people will likely be getting HomePod minis as gifts. It makes perfect sense.
 
I understand the purpose is for HomePod owners but gosh, this seems goofy to me.
I have two HomePods. But there are times I want to play something that Siri doesn’t comprehend or my dog barks while I’m trying to talk to Siri and she says “sorry I can’t find Franklin shut up on Apple Music” and idk how you’d get by without being able to search manually.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lazyrighteye
The thing that would stop me from ever purchasing this “plan” (besides Siri being completely useless) is the thought of ever having to use this on public transport. Bus, train, plane etc. Shouting out what you want to listen to (most likely multiple times due to Siri) is not ideal.
 
This music voice plan should have been FREE since Siri is doing all the magic. I’m not sure why Apple is even charging a service fee for this.

We are already paying for Apple Music Service Fee. Paying for a small feature extra makes no sense. ??‍♀️

Is there even a free trial for this?
You need to reread the article. You don’t seem to understand the subject matter. Your comment makes no sense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.