LPDDR5 in a different spot is still LPDDR5...It’s moot point with Apple Silicon. Though RAM is not part of SOC, it’s packaged close to CPU/GPU in single package. It’s trading High Bandwidth/ performance of Unified memory with expandability.
There was a definite case to be made when Apple was using Intel Chips with separate RAM slots.
Apple is subsidizing the low end entry level Macs with upgraded models.
Yes they are.They're not "subsidizing" the low end models.
It’s not about type, it’s packaged and built as part of the CPU/GPU. They can’t pop it out or solder an updated RAM with ease. Can it be done? You have to jump through hoops. Apple literally has to build a new board if the RAM is customized. Another big reason BTO takes longer for customized RAM or CPU/GPU.LPDDR5 in a different spot is still LPDDR5...
They're not "subsidizing" the low end models.
Subsidizing doesn’t mean loss or break even.so they are selling their (likely) best selling Macs at a loss or just break even?
i wonder when Apple is going bankrupt by such unselfishnness
Making less of a profit margin on something is not subsidizing. Otherwise everything in Best Buy is subsidized by HDMI cables. It's just making less of a profit margin.Yes they are.
Not true. I paid over $1,000 for DDR5 RAM. It was brand new. I don’t know where people get this concept from. Apple’s and any RAM 8GB of RAM 10 years ago is not the same as today’s RAM.RAM is still falling in price over time. Not as fast as before for sure but it's still falling.
How much did you buy for $1000 and when did you buy it? The price of DDR5 was expensive at launch but has dropped considerably since. That's how it goes. Price is high at launch, then production ramps up so price falls.Not true. I paid over $1,000 for DDR5 RAM. It was brand new. I don’t know where people get this concept from. Apple’s and any RAM 8GB of RAM 10 years ago is not the same as today’s RAM.
What exactly do you think a subsidy is?Making less of a profit margin on something is not subsidizing.
What do you think a subsidy is? A subsidy is when somebody gives someone else money to offset the price of something. You can't subsidize yourself. Less profit margin is not a subsidy. Yeesh.What exactly do you think a subsidy is?
My reply to your post was laughing because I agreed with it and it was funny. Not talking about how much money Apple makes or etc... just the scamming of its customers or that's what I think it is.AL2TEACH said:
The ram and storage games are Apple's best scams and they will not give it up easily.
Apple is not trying to capture the laptop market.
![]()
What was said was this:What do you think a subsidy is? A subsidy is when somebody gives someone else money to offset the price of something. You can't subsidize yourself. Less profit margin is not a subsidy. Yeesh.
Apple is subsidizing the low end entry level Macs with upgraded models.
They want as many entry level buyers at lower cost, subsidized by upgrades and power users.
Lol, I did a search and this topic goes back years.I love how every other week there’s an 8/16 thread that gets hundreds of replies lol
8 or 16 years?Lol, I did a search and this topic goes back years.
When I bought an MBP in 2013 it was exactly the same. The sky would fall in unless I "future-proofed" with 16 Gb. But here it is still running with 8 Gb; not as fast as the 8 Gb M2, obvs., but it's fine. And funnily enough, for most of the intervening time, it was running a lot more than a browser with two tabs.Lol, I did a search and this topic goes back years.
The good old, "Well I don't run out, so you're wrong" attitude. So poor RAM management is acceptable because these machine have an SSD to burn through?No, she's not. 256GB is more than enough storage for the average user, home and corporate. Heck, I'm only using 220GB on this MBP, and I've got 75GB+ of ALAC files in that mix, which the average user absolutely does not have.
Because they wouldn't. They might page out to disk occasionally, but with fast SSDs they won't notice it.
is that really a 'good old'? hmmm. meanwhile, fixed this for you:The good old, "Well I don't run out, so you're wrong" attitude. So poor RAM management is acceptable because these machine have an SSD to burn through?
This attitude is one othe reasons Apple get away with having such **** poor RAM/SSD specifications in their products.
Even with the 512GB model storage is tight. With Full iTunes Library, Photographs, i've used 200 of the 512. Given Mac OS and software, thats another 35 - 50 gone, so i'm down to 50% of the storage space the machine came with. Thankfully I rarely have to use this for any work.
Please elaborate how you buy a product with its technical specifications well known and published on the product site and that is somehow a scam.The ram and storage games are Apple's best scams and they will not give it up easily.
Apple is not trying to capture the laptop market.
![]()