I am a shareholder and like it that way.
Apple is doing what the market will bear. That is the job of any company publicly traded. Want to see real ripoffs? Go purchased a new vehicle.
lol, too funny. I never even hinted at the aboveyes, this is why no one buys macbooks, and apple is a poor corporation, and not making any money... as it's been for some time 🙄
It's not the saving money. It's the excessive charges to add more. One would have a choice if there was an option other than not buy.If they want to save money by getting less memory, more power to them!
My 86 year old mother just got the new M2 mini.How many average users even own macs? I stared with Macs 20 years ago cus i needed one for design school and i do photography. I continue to use it for That. I imagine if i didnt have any kind of creative use for it I’d probably just own an iPad or even just a phone. A lot of people out there there these days just do everything on their phone or some cheap laptop like a Chromebook
There is another option. Buy something from another manufacturer. There isn't anything holy about Macs.It's not the saving money. It's the excessive charges to add more. One would have a choice if there was an option other than not buy.
I bought my M1 Max MBP with 64 GB RAM and 1 TB storage from micro center, when they had $200 discount. There are third party authorized resellers who do have upgraded MacBooks. They have 16GB/512, 16GB/256 and many other combinations with discounts.I don't mind Apple starting at 8/256 particularly, but it is slightly annoying how they seem to restrict third party retailers to storage upgrades only
For example Amazon will knock a good few % off the Apple RRP more often than not, but if I want a memory upgrade I have to pay full base RRP as I have to buy direct from Apple then the upgrade on top so I generally don't bother (even though I think many third party retailer orders just come straight from the factory anyway!)
Apple keyboards are the same size across all computers. It wouldn’t make sense to make users adjust to different key sizes whenever they get a new computer.My hands have grown a lot, and I am very excited for the 15 Inch MacBook Air.
Making base RAM higher is not "bettering the product." The product is defined by available RAM, and RAM is available up to the 96 GB that I just bought.This issue has been debated numerous times on MR and it’s generally the same result: “I have no issue with 8GB”, “no! 8GB sucks and it should be 16!”
I personally believe that, regardless of whether or not 8GB is enough, Apple computers are supposed to be premium products and are advertised and priced as such. 8GB of ram and 256GB hard drive is not premium; it is entry level.
I haven’t bought a machine with less than 16GB of ram and 512 hard drive in years and, so far as I’m concerned, the added cost is just the price of the machine. When it’s too much, I just buy a PC, which is the point: if you’re unhappy with Apple, don’t give them your money.
As I mentioned in a prior post, I just bought my daughter a laptop for school. It was a Lenovo with 16 GB or ram and 1 TB hard drive; slightly used (off lease), is was $325 (7th Gen, core i7). For my work, where I need FCP on a laptop, I bought an M2 Max with 32 GB of ram.
Apple has been very clear that they put profits above the needs of the user. They will never upgrade a base machine for the sake of bettering the product. They will only do so when the market requires it. This is what shareholders want and, for many who don’t need anything more than a cheap netbook, this works just fine.
Over 8GB's of ram?if they succeed in getting Apple's ear on this, Apple may be forced to compromise things
Over 8GB's of ram?
And for a good reasonOkay guys, better sit down for this one:
The price of a product bears little to no relation to its production costs.
It's not an uhhappy with thing, it's about the scamming thing with ram. One little apple in the barrel. After that it will be something elseif you’re unhappy with Apple, don’t give them your money.
Just talking about ram being 8 or 16.It has nothing to do with the RAM
I think the issue is that people think Apple should make the base ram 16gb without raising the price.Making base RAM higher is not "bettering the product." The product is defined by available RAM, and RAM is available up to the 96 GB that I just bought.
Making lower base RAM available broadens the product, a good thing. You and I may need more but there are folks with specific workflows that will run under 8 GB RAM. Insisting that those folks pay for 8 extra GB would be wrong.
I think that the idea is the excessive charge for more ram.Insisting that those folks pay for 8 extra GB would be wrong.
true.When will people stop thinking that a system is nothing more than the sum of its parts? It has nothing to do with the RAM, it's about segmenting the product line so they can offer a lower margin system to cost sensitive customers while protecting their margins at the top end.
Yeah, I’m thinking this too. Buy the product you want who cares what the base model is? The Ford Mustang has a four-cylinder engine as the base model. Do you think that stops muscle car enthusiasts from buying the GT500? “Oh, I was going to get that new GT500, but I simply can’t because Ford has a Mustang with a four-cylinder.“Is the OP a real person? This feels like an article written by AI, maybe posted by someone to troll. It just seems... kinda off to me. His hands grew? No longer 100% Apple sheep? Like, what?
Because you have 16 GB!
AL2TEACH said:lol, too funny. I never even hinted at the above![]()
And, amazingly, I bought it that way without complaining about it, or Apple offering 16GB as the minimum for this machine.Because you have 16 GB!