Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My work machine is 8gb MacBook Pro and I’ve never run into a single issue as an IT Professional- my home Mac Mini is absolutely 16gb, because I do photo/video editing on it. 8gb is fine for 95% of the users with the Apple Architecture
 
How many average users even own macs? I stared with Macs 20 years ago cus i needed one for design school and i do photography. I continue to use it for That. I imagine if i didnt have any kind of creative use for it I’d probably just own an iPad or even just a phone. A lot of people out there there these days just do everything on their phone or some cheap laptop like a Chromebook
My 86 year old mother just got the new M2 mini.


With 16GB of RAM.
 
I don't mind Apple starting at 8/256 particularly, but it is slightly annoying how they seem to restrict third party retailers to storage upgrades only

For example Amazon will knock a good few % off the Apple RRP more often than not, but if I want a memory upgrade I have to pay full base RRP as I have to buy direct from Apple then the upgrade on top so I generally don't bother (even though I think many third party retailer orders just come straight from the factory anyway!)
I bought my M1 Max MBP with 64 GB RAM and 1 TB storage from micro center, when they had $200 discount. There are third party authorized resellers who do have upgraded MacBooks. They have 16GB/512, 16GB/256 and many other combinations with discounts.

 
My hands have grown a lot, and I am very excited for the 15 Inch MacBook Air.
Apple keyboards are the same size across all computers. It wouldn’t make sense to make users adjust to different key sizes whenever they get a new computer.
 
This issue has been debated numerous times on MR and it’s generally the same result: “I have no issue with 8GB”, “no! 8GB sucks and it should be 16!”

I personally believe that, regardless of whether or not 8GB is enough, Apple computers are supposed to be premium products and are advertised and priced as such. 8GB of ram and 256GB hard drive is not premium; it is entry level.

I haven’t bought a machine with less than 16GB of ram and 512 hard drive in years and, so far as I’m concerned, the added cost is just the price of the machine. When it’s too much, I just buy a PC, which is the point: if you’re unhappy with Apple, don’t give them your money.

As I mentioned in a prior post, I just bought my daughter a laptop for school. It was a Lenovo with 16 GB or ram and 1 TB hard drive; slightly used (off lease), is was $325 (7th Gen, core i7). For my work, where I need FCP on a laptop, I bought an M2 Max with 32 GB of ram.

Apple has been very clear that they put profits above the needs of the user. They will never upgrade a base machine for the sake of bettering the product. They will only do so when the market requires it. This is what shareholders want and, for many who don’t need anything more than a cheap netbook, this works just fine.
Making base RAM higher is not "bettering the product." The product is defined by available RAM, and RAM is available up to the 96 GB that I just bought.

Making lower base RAM available broadens the product, a good thing. You and I may need more but there are folks with specific workflows that will run under 8 GB RAM. Insisting that those folks pay for 8 extra GB would be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Okay guys, better sit down for this one:

The price of a product bears little to no relation to its production costs.
And for a good reason:)
if you’re unhappy with Apple, don’t give them your money.
It's not an uhhappy with thing, it's about the scamming thing with ram. One little apple in the barrel. After that it will be something else :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Making base RAM higher is not "bettering the product." The product is defined by available RAM, and RAM is available up to the 96 GB that I just bought.

Making lower base RAM available broadens the product, a good thing. You and I may need more but there are folks with specific workflows that will run under 8 GB RAM. Insisting that those folks pay for 8 extra GB would be wrong.
I think the issue is that people think Apple should make the base ram 16gb without raising the price.

That, of course, won’t happen until RAM gets a lot cheaper. Until then, as you point out, all it would do is raise the barrier to entry in the Apple ecosystem.
 
When will people stop thinking that a system is nothing more than the sum of its parts? It has nothing to do with the RAM, it's about segmenting the product line so they can offer a lower margin system to cost sensitive customers while protecting their margins at the top end.
true.
a "$1 ballpoint pen" should in fact be $10.000-20.000 since those are completely professional tools too that enable me to write multi million selling award winning books or theses!
 
Is the OP a real person? This feels like an article written by AI, maybe posted by someone to troll. It just seems... kinda off to me. His hands grew? No longer 100% Apple sheep? Like, what?
Yeah, I’m thinking this too. Buy the product you want who cares what the base model is? The Ford Mustang has a four-cylinder engine as the base model. Do you think that stops muscle car enthusiasts from buying the GT500? “Oh, I was going to get that new GT500, but I simply can’t because Ford has a Mustang with a four-cylinder.“

At some 16 GB will be the new standard and everyone here is going to be saying 32 GB should be the new standard. Not everyone is at the tech nerd standard and for those who are you should know the difference between memory pressure and memory used. I had a Mac mini with 32 GB of RAM and it was frequently over 20 GB. Does that mean I could have gotten away with a 16 GB model? No it was using it because it had it.


I would rather see Apple keep the base price low even if that means the base spec is for people who only browse the web and do office documents. My mom has an M1 Mac mini with 8 GB/ 256 GB. Neither one of those have been pushed to the limit. That computer will likely die before she needs an upgrade and is more than enough for what she needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Audentia
8Gb is rather mean for laptops that are mostly over 1k. But the far far far bigger issue is the price for RAM and Storage upgrades, which becomes ridiculous the higher you go. I'm surprised the EU haven't investigated.

i.e. for my iMac 2020 I went 8Gb -> 32Gb of RAM for £100, with Mac Mini Apple Silicon 8Gb -> 24Gb is £400. Ditto with the storage, Samsung T7 2TB SSD is £160 compared to Apple Silicon 512Gb -> 2Tb is £600. Madness and utter greed.
 
Screen Shot 2023-04-20 at 9.16.31 AM.png


Used daily for work. I have no complaints.
 
Are people of the opinion that Apple shouldn't raise the base level to 16Gb (with the same current pricing of the 8Gb), of the opinion that it should stay that way forever, or at least the foreseeable future? How long until starting at 16Gb would be appropriate?

Just for history, 8Gb has been the base level RAM in the Macbook Air since 2017, so for about 6 years. The base level RAM was 4Gb for 5 years, and was 2Gb for 4 years. (Near as I can tell, 2008 was when starting RAM was raised from 1Gb to 2Gb on Macbooks).

Here's the full timeline of MacBook Air base model RAM.

2008 (original) -> 2Gb
2012 -> 4Gb
2017 -> 8Gb

So, take it for what its worth that a product that's been around for 15 years has seen 2 bumps in base-level RAM.

The argument that Apple would have to raise the price if they upped the base to 16Gb doesn't match history. Unless I missed something when researching, the starting price of the base 13" MacBook Air model went DOWN in price when they upped the base RAM from 2Gb to 4Gb in 2012. When they went from 4Gb to 8Gb in 2017, the price remained $999.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.