Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple Negotiating to Offer Rentals for Movies Still in Theaters, but at a Price

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,297
35,331



Apple wants to bring new movies to iTunes more quickly, and is in talks with several film studios over rights that would allow it earlier access to content, reports Bloomberg.

Warner Bros, Universal Pictures, and 21st Century Fox are all seeking deals to offer higher-priced rentals of new movies as soon as two weeks after they debut in theaters, and the studios are said to be considering an offer from Apple.

itunesmovies-800x563.jpg

Like Apple Music exclusives, access to earlier releases could draw more people to Apple's platform, but encryption is said to be a concern. Studios aren't sure whether iTunes will be a secure platform for showing movies that are still in theaters, because content can be recorded and leaked online.
The most recent talks are part of longer-running efforts by Cupertino, California-based Apple to get new movies sooner, two of the people said. Such an arrangement could help iTunes stand out in a crowded online market for movies, TV shows and music. While the iTunes store helped Apple build a dominant role in music retailing, the company hasn't carved out a similar role in music and video streaming.
Click to expand...
Most major movies that debut in theaters are not available on iTunes and other streaming platforms for a period of 90 days, but film companies are said to be looking to expand beyond theaters to find new revenue streams.

At least one option studios are considering involves a $25 to $50 fee for a new rental, which is potentially more affordable than a movie theater ticket depending on how many people are watching a film.

No deal has been established as of yet, and it's possible the film studios could decide to offer the rights to a competing company.

Article Link: Apple Negotiating to Offer Rentals for Movies Still in Theaters, but at a Price
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/12/07/apple-film-studios-itunes-movie-negotiations/
  • Like
Reactions: Bill_Almasides and DEXTERITY
They should have a movie subscription pass. I've got a movie pass for a cinema in the U.K. It's £18 month. Why not just extend that to digital showings? Oh that's right, because they cinemas would complain they aren't extorting people for money when they buys drinks or popcorn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechGeek76, dgr874, Huck and 5 others
Even if folks can't decrypt the iTunes encryption, I bet the quality of the "cam" bootlegs will dramatically increase. :)

If it's in the $20-$30 range, I'd be willing to pay for this. I'd much rather watch a new release at home than in the theaters around where I live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru, rjbenson83, ckurt25 and 19 others
Recently at Vero Beach I saw 2 films for just over $4 each (around £3, usual ticket prices at home £6-12), if more films were at that price I'd go more often as opposed to my usual wait for a home release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt and Nunyabinez
it would be a good risk to take, honestly... i mean, if you want pirated content, that'll always be there, even without immediate rentals... this will be like steve jobs's "carrot" theory: people will pay money if the carrot is easier to get/higher quality. If the studios can really take advantage of this and let people watch movies at super high quality levels (hdr, high frame rate, etc...), it might work out...
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru, ewkp, Oblivious.Robot and 3 others
and 1989 others said:
They should have a movie subscription pass. I've got a movie pass for a cinema in the U.K. It's £18 month. Why not just extend that to digital showings? Oh that's right, because they cinemas would complain they aren't extorting people for money when they buys drinks or popcorn.
Click to expand...

They aren't extorting people. The theater makes very little money on the movie tickets sold and has to make a large majority of their profits with concession sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru, mantan, JohnArtist and 14 others
rammes said:
so we get a hd rip within two weeks? I wonder if the studio's take that risk
Click to expand...
It's not a bad idea, but pretty pricey. At $50, I probably wouldn't do it. At $25, I'd probably use it occasionally. If they get it down to $15-$20, I'd use it a lot. Only 2 people in our household so it doesn't make financial sense for us if it's priced for 3+ people watching.

What would sweeten the deal and get me to consider using it more at the higher price is if they'd apply part of the rental price to purchasing the movie when it becomes available for sale later on. Let's say they charge $35 for the rental (while in theaters), but then a few months later you can buy the movie at a $10 discount ($10 instead of $20). Or something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru, ckurt25, V.K. and 8 others
It cost $20 for 2 to go to the theater and $20 for 2 for food and drinks. I don't see the perks here because I'd rather just buy the movie for $20 or watch it on Redbox for $2 about. Maybe $10 imo it would be worth it for some movies but will probably never happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATMueller, ackmondual, ohio.emt and 2 others
Only worth it if you have a really good TV to enjoy a movie. I would pay ~$30 for a movie that I can enjoy on my own time, being able to pause, rewind, seems pretty cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unr1
MacRumors said:
Studios aren't sure whether iTunes will be a secure platform for showing movies that are still in theaters, because content can be recorded and leaked online.
Click to expand...

They aren't sure? ROFL...where do they think all those web-dl come from? The encryption was broken a long time ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru
Seems like every few months this same topic comes up but with a different potential streaming partner.

Cost for Me + SO + baby sitter > $50 so I'd be interested if this ever actually came to market. I wouldn't do it frequently, but I'd do it for movies I really wanted to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisbru, ewkp, DCINKC and 4 others
Brian Y said:
Wow, $50!!!!?! That's insane.
Click to expand...

Don't forget that you can have as many people in your living room as you can fit to watch that rented movie. This will be great for families, parties or friends coming over.

And these are first run movies that are concurrently running in theaters. Don't want to pay $50? You can always wait 4-6 months later for the standard rental fee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjbenson83, Dydegu, George Zip and 4 others
and 1989 others said:
They should have a movie subscription pass. I've got a movie pass for a cinema in the U.K. It's £18 month. Why not just extend that to digital showings? Oh that's right, because they cinemas would complain they aren't extorting people for money when they buys drinks or popcorn.
Click to expand...
Too be fair, most cinemas make their profit off of confectionary and drinks because they make very little profit on the actual ticket itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnArtist, johnnyturbouk and JoeInMilwaukee
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back