You have to be out of your ****ing mind to blame this on MacRumors. First, this has been all over the internet for weeks, if not months. I've been seeing it on the Apple subreddit for quite a while.
Second, either Apple is a great and generous company with this repair/replace or they aren't.
There is no such thing as taking advantage of Apple because of this, they're either generous enough to replace faulty machines or they are not. There's no middle ground. There is no point at which a company like Apple with half a trillion dollars in the bank should have to say "No, this is too expensive". They unintentionally put out a faulty product and were rewarding customers with a better one, that's incredibly fantastic.
And now they're not.
It wasn't because of MacRumors, it was because they decided the program was too expensive and they don't want to be quite as nice to their customers. It was because at the end of the day they are NOT as kind and generous as we all want them to be. That is it, not MacRumor's ruining something.
[doublepost=1501264951][/doublepost]
I think you mean: I won't apologize.
(Great gesture that Joe Rossignol was the first to like this post.)
Why should they apologize for something that is not in any way their fault? Read the edit with the memo.
[doublepost=1501265020][/doublepost]
No, you broke a goodfaith program that helped people in real need. This is the tragedy of the commons, plain and simple. You don't have to apologize but you're certainly at fault.
How did they break something when the decision was made before they posted the article?
[doublepost=1501265078][/doublepost]
Can you clarify how a posting a topic with no actionable value, and whoose only foreseeable outcome is Apple's termination of a generous good will policy, is "valuable to our readers"?
Can you clarify how it's their fault when the decision was made before their article went up?
[doublepost=1501265168][/doublepost]
A bonus that you ruined with your article. People which were genuinely affected were getting a cool bonus, completely unaware of it making of an amazing surprise. You post your article and what happened? A big flock of people running to Apple Stores all claiming with battery problems, which obviously caused Apple to back down. Way to go!!!
Except the decision was made before their article went up. And as I posted above either Apple is great and generous and going to give everyone replacements or they aren't. The number of people who request replacements for BROKEN MACHINES is irrelevant, they shouldn't be giving special treatment to first X,000 people who come in.
[doublepost=1501265246][/doublepost]
How is that? Be specific.
They stopped replacing the machines and opted instead to replace the battery.