I didn’t choose to allow stealth price increases, so your hypothetical doesn’t apply.Well, as an adult, if you choose to take any personal responsibility, you then become responsible for accepting the consequences.
Easy.
Easy.
I didn’t choose to allow stealth price increases, so your hypothetical doesn’t apply.Well, as an adult, if you choose to take any personal responsibility, you then become responsible for accepting the consequences.
Easy.
well first of all u cannot really do that on ios ,be it ipad os or ios on iphonesyes we can... stop using App Store
In particular if they do it on a yearly basis.Allowing an automatic renewal for up to 50% on an annual subscription seems pretty steep.
At the same time, if you are paying for a $100/year app that can now go to $150, I still call that steep.Not really since the max monthly increase is $5/mo or $50/year. A $2/mo app can only increase to $3/mo. If you are paying for a $20/mo app, it can only go up to $25/mo.
I didn’t choose to allow stealth price increases, so your hypothetical doesn’t apply.
Easy.
Apple is only in the situation they're in because they are the platform with apps. And to protect those apps, they need to protect their developers.Terrible idea Apple, you have always said you protect your customers, now it seems your swinging the other way.
You will be notified of the price increase. You can then choose to opt-out.It is not opt out if i'm not notified that i should consider opting out. No matter how you put it. They added an extra step that has no justification with the exception of fleecing their customers.
As for the UK, I'm thinking it will go more consumer hostile with BRExit![]()
Perhaps. But that is still less $5/mo. A $200/yr app can also only go to $250.At the same time, if you are paying for a $100/year app that can now go to $150, I still call that steep.
Isn’t £100pa to £150pa both <= 50% and <= £5pm?It can't jump that high: per the requirement it has to be both <=50% AND <=$5/mo.
Yes, it is (I edited my post to correct). Misread that $100/yr part as $100/mo. Granted the example cited is arguably at the boundary case for the largest possible increase.Isn’t £100pa to £150pa both <= 50% and <= £5pm?
Yes it’s definitely on the upper end of what is opt-out vs opt-in.Yes, it is (I edited my post to correct). Misread that $100/yr part as $100/mo. Granted the example cited is arguably at the boundary case for the largest possible increase.
They should talk to their central banks who printed all the money.Good luck dealing with regulators… some countries’ regulators will have field day with this change.
I don't necessarily agree with the change either way, but lets be real here. There is nothing stealth about receiving multiple notifications via multiple methods about the changes. Talk about hyperbole.I didn’t choose to allow stealth price increases, so your hypothetical doesn’t apply.
Easy.
Tried what though? None of subscriptions I hold here, in the EU, other than how the App Store works before the change, gives me an easy opt out. They tell me they put the prices up, when they do, and I continue or not. As I said, I dont have an opinion either way, but all they have done is change how you can opt out, nothing else. They have made it a touch harder, but its certainly not any obstacle, its no different from any other non apple store app subscription, and there is nothing stealthy going on.Such things are not allowed in the EU, they will hit the wall here, cell phone carriers and magazine publishers tried this once and got heavily slapped.
You will see the lawsuit coming soon enough that will make you believe.Tried what though? None of subscriptions I hold here, in the EU, other than how the App Store works before the change, gives me an easy opt out. They tell me they put the prices up, when they do, and I continue or not. As I said, I dont have an opinion either way, but all they have done is change how you can opt out, nothing else. They have made it a touch harder, but its certainly not any obstacle, its no different from any other non apple store app subscription, and there is nothing stealthy going on.
I'm not sure what you're thinking to be honest.
Lawsuit? Why? Did you read the article?You will see the lawsuit coming soon enough that will make you believe.
Wait and see it happening, it will…Lawsuit? Why? Did you read the article?
Judging from your post history you have been a vocal proponent of this type of 'free the developer of Apples grip' move - so I would think you should support this type of derestriction on Apples part. Unless it's just you don't really know what you want other than you just want Apple to burn. I suspect the latter.
Wait and see it happening, it will…
Heh funny your interpretation of my previous posts. The last thing I will support is a feature solely made to milk consumers.
That probably won’t help, and is likely to make this particular situation worse.
No idea, I’ve never used PayPal for subscriptions but PayPal isn’t the only payment provider.Correct me if I'm wrong but PayPal needs you to agree to any subscription price change if true than it's certainly a better payment provider than Apple.