They literally need a computer on each end inside the plugs.Priced at $159 without tax. Ouch! Never understood why these cables cost so much.
They literally need a computer on each end inside the plugs.Priced at $159 without tax. Ouch! Never understood why these cables cost so much.
As others have pointed out - because this isn't a piece of copper crimped between two connectors.Priced at $159 without tax. Ouch! Never understood why these cables cost so much.
Suggest you read about how these cables are made. Then you'll understand.Priced at $159 without tax. Ouch! Never understood why these cables cost so much.
Reasonably priced directly from Apple https://www.apple.com/shop/product/...4fc3f1651f86f7cb846468f0e6621abd86d407a8a5d04Was looking for a thunderbolt 2 cable the other day. Talk about hens teeth![]()
that‘s true, but that means we need to start considering a switch to fiber optic data transfer protocols of Thunderbolt. The roadmap for Lightpeak called for the switch-over awhile ago, we’ve just been able to pull more and more life out of copper; Once we start going over 60GB/s, we might not have a choice.As others have pointed out - because this isn't a piece of copper crimped between two connectors.
Priced at $159 without tax. Ouch! Never understood why these cables cost so much.
Then buy such a cable. It turns out that it does not meet any standards and does not work. Apple knows what it's taking the money for and that it has no competition.Wonder if these would be included in AppleCare if purchased with the Studio Display.
I don’t get it either. A quick search on Amazon has TB4 2/6 feet for $50/60 though, so maybe there’s something to carrying the bandwidth to 3m.
Let’s hope not that company is trash$159 ????
Did Apple acquire Monster Cables?
Seriously, I'm sticking to cheaper and shorter TB3 cable wherever I can.
The bare cables themselves probably distort the signals significantly at the target frequencies and length so the active components on the ends have to compensate for the distortion.Wonder if these would be included in AppleCare if purchased with the Studio Display.
I don’t get it either. A quick search on Amazon has TB4 2/6 feet for $50/60 though, so maybe there’s something to carrying the bandwidth to 3m.
In this case it might be a combination of things: The high bandwidth throughput of TB4, the quality of the materials, Apple Tax, and the fact that Thunderbolt is proprietary technology (co-developed by Apple but owned solely by Intel today).
There is also a lack of competing products, you cannot easily find a trustable brand selling another 3-m TB4 cable, while you can easily find reputable third-party sellers for USB-C and Lighting cables of varied lengths and coatings.
That's like... *counts on fingers* ...9 feet!
Or 100 KFC bucketsFor $90 more you can buy a well-reviewed 28" BenQ 4K monitor![]()
Also them not realizing that other protocols that get close to TB in speed actually cost more - it's just that the cost is absorbed into the devices on either end, not into the cable. (You could remake Thunderbolt to not need the chips in the cable, but it would require more expensive chips on each end to do the same job - and still require the high-quality cable itself. And you'd lose the ability to have fiber optic cables as well.)ITT: a bunch of people who don't understand the extremely tight manufacturing tolerances (and potentially extra circuitry) required to manufacture a Thunderbolt 4 cable, especially of any length.
Signal attenuation over distance is absolutely a thing, and with the high bandwidth of TB4 there is much less leeway/availability for transmission errors/error correction.
$159 for a 3M TB4 cable is a fantastic price in 2022. Maybe in a couple of years manufacturing advances enable cheaper cables at this length, but for today this is absolutely not a bad deal.