You know something's overpriced when even Apple discounts it outside of Black Friday...
Keep in mind: Same happened wirh the original iPhone. And we know what happened later...
You know something's overpriced when even Apple discounts it outside of Black Friday...
Who upgrades a TV every 5 years? I use mine until it konks out. Tablets seem to be on a 4 year replacement cycle. As for watches, I don't think anyone has figured out the replacement cycle yet since they haven't been out long enough.I agree. Also wearables won't take off because consumers don't have the appetite for yet another screen to buy and upgrade. We already have TVs that we upgrade every 5-10 years, desktops/laptops (sometimes more than one) that we upgrade every 2-5 years, tablets that we upgrade every 2-3 years, and smartphones that we upgrade every 2 years. And electronics companies think they can sell us another screen? No thank you.
Hate to say it, but this is an easy way for Apple to move their stock of Apple Watches; they're clearly not selling.
It was a nice idea to see if Apple could make a success of wearables; they could hardly know that it was going to become Newton 2.0.
Regardless of its failure, I'm glad that it has brought so much joy to many here at MacRumors; long may they enjoy their Apple Watches.
Who upgrades a TV every 5 years? I use mine until it konks out. Tablets seem to be on a 4 year replacement cycle. As for watches, I don't think anyone has figured out the replacement cycle yet since they haven't been out long enough.
Well, this says it all. Tim's largest blunder other than the acquisition of Beats.![]()
Heh, the iPhone surely was doomed wasn't it. Heck Steve Jobs even sent out a press release announcing the price reduction.Yeah, or they would have lowered the price across the board at the September event.
Odd to think if they did that most people (including myself) would immediately think "Oh, the Watch isn't selling" and judge Apple harshly for it, even though they dropped the iPhone's price by $200 in September 2007, and that product clearly didn't fail.
They HAVE done it before. With the iPhone.Actually I think it's an interesting idea to try out. But of course anything Apple does that it hasn't done before is a sign of doom.
So pretty much everything your iPhone already does for you.Interesting "blunder" that has sold at least $1.7 billion in six months. And I'm enjoying mine quite nicely, thank you. Used it to tell Siri to turn off my Hue lights last night. Bought my lunch with it today. It tracks my activities, provides quick access to reminders, and quick glances at emails and messages. Unlocks my door when I get home. Wakes me up in the morning. Tells me time and weather with a glance at my wrist. And it will only get better from here.
At some point the iPhone won't even be a necessary part of the equation.So pretty much everything your iPhone already does for you.
Heh, the iPhone surely was doomed wasn't it. Heck Steve Jobs even sent out a press release announcing the price reduction.
Every year people complain about Apple's lame Black Friday discounts yet this is somehow a bad sign because Apple doesn't do discounts. What do you want people?
BECAUSE THE APPLE WATCH IS A FAILURE!!!!A very un-Apple like promotion.
Yep if you type in all caps that makes it so much more believable.BECAUSE THE APPLE WATCH IS A FAILURE!!!!
Apple is doing what ever it can to get rid of the surplus. No one is buying it. Terrible marketing, fake expectations. Apple was arrogant to the highest stupidity level ever, they acted if that what ever crap thei put together would be sell like rice because... "is Apple". And no! is a lame piece of crap.
Exactly! My gut reaction to a Watch price drop would be "Oh crap, the first entirely post-Jobs product is failing" even though when I stop and think it through for a moment, that isn't the case.
When I really stop and think about it, I can't help but consider most people's main objection to the Watch: "If you need your phone with you for it to work, why do you need the Watch?"
That sounds like it would be a much easier sell if it was dependent of iPhone (or at least, as dependent as an iPod classic is from a PC).
It's all guesswork anyway as we don't know actual sales numbers. If they sold >3million in 80 days, it beat the iPad launch. If it beat 700,000 on opening weekend, it beat the iPhone launch.
Right, that's why it's not available at any Apple Store in my state.Desperate times call for desperate measures
Probably because the iPhone 3G saw a 50% discount...Keep in mind: Same happened wirh the original iPhone. And we know what happened later...
Why not? Lots of people have FitBits, etc. This doesn't need to be a blockbuster product. It just needs to sell well enough to a large enough group of people.The point wasn't about precise replacement cycles, the point was that we already have lots of screens with a replacement cycle of some kind. I count 4 major types of screens that are at or near saturation now, at least in the major markets. I don't think consumers have the appetite for a 5th screen to buy/use/upgrade.
Have you actually used one?$50 won't make up for appalling battery life!