i like the concept, played with them in store. But they should be standalone device, without need an Iphone.
Yep same where I am, people everywhere except the watch tables, it's like there's an invisible electric fence around those tables.I was at the Apple store today because I am looking for a gift. Guess which tables had no one at them....... Those tables were like a ghost town! I was only there for 20 minutes but no one stopped once!
The other tables were crazy busy.. Just saying
So you keep saying...you don't like it we get it....
stop repeating yourself
It does everything a lot of people want it for. It isn't for everybody that's clear
...it's like there's an invisible electric fence around those tables.
It reaches a certain point where people feel their lives are being encroached on rather than being made easier. The glasses, the watches, the idea of chips embedded in peoples' clothing or even in their bodies -- none of it will ever fly. I believe that most people do not want that level of intimacy with their technology. Especially in our current age of little or no privacy.this thing has got to be dragging. i don't know if the wearable tech thing will ever catch on.. none of it really seems desirable.
I have to think it is a test to see if people are interested. You have to think that iPhone 6s sales must be really hurting that Apple is willing to try to move them by discounting the Apple Watch!I'm confused...why are they offering this promotion only in select stores in the Bay Area and Boston metro? I don't recall Apple stores ever doing local promotions like this before.
People wear regular watches... they carry phones already... so naturally smart watches are the next big thing.It reaches a certain point where people feel their lives are being encroached on rather than being made easier. The glasses, the watches, the idea of chips embedded in peoples' clothing or even in their bodies -- none of it will ever fly. I believe that most people do not want that level of intimacy with their technology. Especially in our current age of little or no privacy.
This reminded me of their 100$ discount on the first iPhone.You know something's overpriced when even Apple discounts it outside of Black Friday...
On the contrary, what I want from the future generations of the watch is more health sensors. Let the watch measure my every single bodily function and report to me. That's what I want. I don't care at all if it gets more apps or runs without the phone. I always carry my phone anyway. Don't care if it gets more than 18 hours battery either. It's way to easy to snap that thing onto the charger every night.It reaches a certain point where people feel their lives are being encroached on rather than being made easier. The glasses, the watches, the idea of chips embedded in peoples' clothing or even in their bodies -- none of it will ever fly. I believe that most people do not want that level of intimacy with their technology. Especially in our current age of little or no privacy.
I wish my iPhone had a battery life that came remotely close to the Apple Watch. End of 16+ hour day my Apple Watch is seldom less than 60%; my phone never makes it through the day. Apple Watch takes less than an hour to fully charge; iPhone, more.$50 won't make up for appalling battery life!
Seems everyone here has lost sight of the fact that in order to get that $50 discount on the watch, you need to purchase an iPhone as well.
That will stimulate a lot of people want the watch, but weren't thinking of buying a phone, to end up buying both. An excellent win for Apple as they lose only $50 on a sale of both a phone and a watch.
They HAVE done it before. With the iPhone.
...
It's all guesswork anyway as we don't know actual sales numbers. If they sold >3million in 80 days, it beat the iPad launch. If it beat 700,000 on opening weekend, it beat the iPhone launch.
However you can't use that argument. Apple is counting on current iPhone owners to drive UP sales for what is basically an iPhone accessory. The iPhone and iPad were stand-alone items. If the watch was a stand-alone, then it holds water.
...
Right, that's why it's not available at any Apple Store in my state.
Why not? Lots of people have FitBits, etc. This doesn't need to be a blockbuster product. It just needs to sell well enough to a large enough group of people.
lol. No one is going to buy an $800+ device to get $50 of the watch. This just encourages people buying phones to also buy the watch
You posting the same thing over and over in one thread isn't going to make apple change anything anytime soon.Stop saying you like it, we get it...
Others dont, you are clearly correct..
I want a watch that does "something useful" it doesn't do that right now (other than suck juice from the grid). i bought the watch, i have the watch I'm entitled to express my opinion and I'm going to keep doing it until either apple does something about the lack of apps and functionality or others stop buying it...!
It looks like Target will be offering similar discounts. To me it makes a lot of sense. This is the peak quarter for iPhone sales and also the holiday shopping season. Tim Cook said he wanted to sell a lot of Apple Watches over the holiday season, so why not offer a bundle as an upsell?
http://9to5toys.com/2015/10/28/target-apple-watch-discount/
So they are trying to recreate the iPhone sales model by replicating the iPhone model with a watch?
Yeah. Right.
Not sure what your logic is here other than nonsensical.So they are trying to recreate the iPhone sales model by replicating the iPhone model with a watch?
Yeah. Right.