No, she isn't claiming that. As I've said to others in this thread, you can't pull things out of context. You have to understand statements in the context they were made. She's a design person, and this is a design conversation. The whole conversation springs from one of her first statements:
"Absolutely central to the work that we did was asking how do you distill the essence of a Mac? And I think that comes through in the materiality and the quality of it." So all the context clues should make it obvious she's not talking about things like the A18 Pro chip or USB2. Those are completely outside her wheelhouse and the sphere of the conversation. When she says "older technology" it's in the context of design, material, build, manufacturing--things of that nature. What it means more specifically than that, who knows--I don't think she went into it. It's likely at worst just a uninformative phrase, not a filthy lie that she decided to throw in to try to trick people into buying the Neo.
I know people online love to pick apart things big companies (or any public target) say looking for some technicality as a grounds to prove they are evil, but the problem is that approach easily and often does lead to misinterpreting words and statements out of context (sometimes intentionally, sometimes unintentionally, sometimes a mix), as some in this thread have done. It's the exact same thing that happens in gotcha journalism all the time (but that's usually very intentional). These types of people point fingers and make a lot of noise and try to get everyone riled up (for clicks, hate, and who knows what other motivations). But in the end it's just noise, because even the times they don't misinterpret, it usually amounts to a huge nothing burger that affects no one.