I have software that has a LOT of menus at the top.I really don't think a notch in the MacBook Pro screen would be bad. See my mockup.
I have software that has a LOT of menus at the top.I really don't think a notch in the MacBook Pro screen would be bad. See my mockup.
seems like there are programs whose menu bar items would impede on that.I'm looking at the menu bar on my MacBook Pro 15" and there is 4" of clear, blank space in the center. Hell, they could put a dozen notches into that area without interfering with a damn thing. So I’m not sure why people are so adverse to a little notch sitting inside a barren desert of menu bar space. I don't like the noch on my iPhone because it does take up valuable space, but it won't take up anything of value on the macOS menu bar.
The mockup already tells it all... it is very distracting and aesthetically bothersome...I really don't think a notch in the MacBook Pro screen would be bad. See my mockup.
Exactly my thoughts. That’s also why I am not a fan of face ID instead touch ID. My camera is always behind a cover unless I need it.Curious about two things. The menu bar implementation and webcam privacy covers adaptation.
This is how I see this working. The vertical real estate that includes the notch would not be reachable by a mouse nor addressable by an application. Rather, only system information can be placed there initially and it has zero effect on external monitors and running applications; i.e. applications still see a 16:10 area as before. Basically, the machine has a virtual 74px high forehead that has some potential system usage rather than being simply a forehead. It is possible that future version of MacOS could allow applications to update this area but that would be a MacBook Pro specific feature, much like an application's usage of TouchBar.This seems strange to me, but I suppose if they want to follow the current obsession with erasing bezels it's the only way to go. Though what they're describing sounds less like a "notch" and more like a way to allow the bezel to be more useful—i.e., if it's going to display icons/text on a black background, then it's pretty much a bezel, in the sense that it's not an accessible part of the UI. It might actually be kinda cool if it could display some of Activity Monitor's info.
Which no—clickable information, besides time and date, could the OS display that would be useful to most people. Information that would fill the larger width of the 16” Notchbook and even larger external displays you mentioned.This is how I see this working. The vertical real estate that includes the notch would not be reachable by a mouse nor addressable by an application. Rather, only system information can be placed there initially and it has zero effect on external monitors and running applications; i.e. applications still see a 16:10 area as before. Basically, the machine has a virtual 74px high forehead that has some potential system usage rather than being simply a forehead. It is possible that future version of MacOS could allow applications to update this area but that would be a MacBook Pro specific feature, much like an application's usage of TouchBar.
Now imagine if Apple's releases a new desktop monitor with a notch, then concept would extend to external monitors in some way.
No idea at the moment, but let's start with time and date. I use iStatsMenus so something similar could be useful to me, like memory usage, network activity, etc. Less useful if I can't click on it to see details though. At some point if this area becomes usable by an application then the initial limited use evolves to something more useful. I guess we'll find out in 24 hours.Which no—clickable information, besides time and date, could the OS display that would be useful to most people. Information that would fill the larger with of the 16” Notchbook and even larger external displays you mentioned.
That's even worse. That means menu bar drops down in order. And what relevant information would it display? Task icons? Weather? Language? Time? There is no info that ot can display that's already not on the menu bar. Menu bar is the top component of UI, the header if you will. You can't put anything above it and even if they do the extra display is still useless and one more component that adds to the actual price.Again, read the original article. It describes a main display with two secondary displays - the areas either side of a potential notch. Those areas are blacked out but can be used for additional information.
The thing is that this would be "useless" bezel space anyway, due to the presence of the camera. So it's just a bezel that can display some info, afaik. I think that could be kinda useful in some ways, for example, having a low-overhead way of displaying Activity Monitor stuff, like cpu/memory. This is supposed to be a "pro" machine, after all, so it would make some sense. There could even be an option to have it "off", so it's just a black bezel.That's even worse. That means menu bar drops down in order. And what relevant information would it display? Task icons? Weather? Language? Time? There is no info that ot can display that's already not on the menu bar. Menu bar is the top component of UI, the header if you will. You can't put anything above it and even if they do the extra display is still useless and one more component that adds to the actual price.
I was waiting for yet another 'brilliant mind' to put a 'gate' on this, to join the hundreds (or is it now thousands?) that have done the very same with something that was not broken into, nor stolen.Cant wait for notch-gate on the NotchBook Pros.
Notch-gate anticipation-gate.I was waiting for yet another 'brilliant mind' to put a 'gate' on this, to join the hundreds (or is it now thousands?) that have done the very same with something that was not broken into, nor stolen.
I was waiting for yet another 'brilliant mind' to put a 'gate' on this, to join the hundreds (or is it now thousands?) that have done the very same with something that was not broken into, nor stolen.
I wholly agree with this. If the extra screen space is kept blacked out except for a few bits of text and status icons, then the display still looks like it has the big ol’ fat bezels at the top, which defeats the point of the engineering and “hearts and minds” marketing effort needed to cut the notch out in the first place. The spaces next to the notch are much, much wider than needed by the time and WiFi icon, and allowing more colorful content—which can’t be interacted with, mind!—above the macOS menu bar would just make the display look garish and top-heavy.That's what the iPhone X rumors said, but it turns out Apple loves to embrace the notch and make it stand out by not making the background black.