Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This was first submitted in 2012 Apple submits patent applications for lots of things. Doesn't mean they all end up in shipping products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31 and Gudi
I'd quite like the BTO option of a quad-core i7 and a dedicated GPU in the 13" MacBook Pro. Then again, Jony Ive would visibly palpitate and lick his lips in delicious anticipation of shredding another millimetre from the structure.

Hopefully they'll stick with thinness in the MacBook and MacBook Air, while dedicating better hardware to the MacBook Pro at the expense of thinness/lightness - it's meant to be a Pro machine, after all. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marek.jalovec
Oh Apple, I don't even know what to say anymore...

Green computing my ass, when all your products are so hard to repair without forking over the serious dough for your out-of-warranty repairs, which is silly, because I am skilled, but I also know that adhesives are just a PITA.

Green my ass...

This was first submitted in 2012 Apple submits patent applications for lots of things. Doesn't mean they all end up in shipping products.
True, shows their way of thinking and their priorities somewhat though.

Glassed Silver:ios
 
Last edited:
Because OS X, in its current form, is not designed for a touch interface.
OS X works perfectly fine on a touchscreen, better than with a mouse, so long as it's a large display. OS X on a big Wacom Cintiq is the finest mac experience there is.

It just doesn't scale down to tiny portable devices well. While touchscreens are great for phones and PDA's, they are also unbeatable for professional creative work. Apple's missing the boat on this currently, but eventually a few old conservative executives will retire, and then they'll play catch up again.
 
. The long throw of the old keyboard was based on the typewriter and I think it is okay for all of us to move on from a hundred year old standard.

Buttons have existed for a lot longer than that. There's a reason they work well for input. Not saying there won't be a time when we'll have the technology to completely fool our senses, but until then their removal will remain a compromise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
A thinner iMac? FINALLY.

It's the one thing that's been holding me off replacing my 2008 iMac with optical drive. I just hope it's a lot lighter, too. That's the other thing that bugs me, whenever I have to carry it around. /s

Pfft, speak for yourself. Until I can use my iMac to cut through my man-sized slab of Scamorza cheese, I won't be satisfied. It's still not thin enough!! :mad:
 
Ugh... does this not seem like a defensive patent to anyone?

If it is a "real" thing, would it be so implausible to create a solid-state keyboard? Imagine a keyboard that felt good enough, but the keys actually don't move at all... it would be nearly indestructible. That, and no fan... no moving parts AT ALL. Maybe that's the real goal. Two things that move; the screen hinge, and the power button.
 
They're getting everyone closer and closer to touch typing... eventually they'll get everyone to the point where they can get away with make the base a big iPad with little haptic "bumps" to center your fingertips while typing, and then enable applications to finally have their own control surfaces and move beyond the typewriter UI.

Everyone assumes the touchscreen should go up top like a Surface Book, but it'd be far more useful and ergonomic on the horizontal base.
Nice to see some forward thinking on this forum! Sure, it may not all come to pass, but at least you're not stuck in the paradigm ruts of the past.
 
Thinner macs? How much thinner can they get? Invisible computing? Wtf..
I always tell people "I never heard anyone complain about the first iPhone being too thick" but each year or two, they make it thinner (to the point where people can bend them by just putting them in their pockets and sitting down)

But, they were able to make a trackpad that does not really click, feel like it still does. I would be interested to see what they can do with the keyboard!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avieshek and bobob
A thinner iMac? FINALLY.

It's the one thing that's been holding me off replacing my 2008 iMac with optical drive. I just hope it's a lot lighter, too. That's the other thing that bugs me, whenever I have to carry it around. /s

Thanks for the laugh, man. I just got coffee on my already-thin-enough-thank-you-very-much-Apple-now-go-fix-something-that-actually-needs-to-be-fixed keyboard because of you.
 

Are you trying to give me a Vietnam-style horror flashback?! The lag on those damn things were horrendous. I remember punching the keys, screaming with frustration as they wouldn't accept the characters.

Hmm, maybe Apple are going to do a similar thing.

"To ... create ... this product, we asked ourselves: what do consumers most want from a notebook? The answer, of course, is not more power, or better battery life, but a biblically unreliable keyboard. The user will ... sympathetically press each key, enjoying not only the feel, but the experience, of typing. It's unapologetically laggy.

We, at Apple, feel that life sometimes moves too ... quickly. By ... distilling the user experience, refining the joy of pressing a key, users can once again learn to type. To ... condense the encounter between the finger and the key, our engineers had to start from the beginning -- quite literally.

Put simply, it's the best keyboard we've ever made."


jony-ive-10-20-09.jpg
 
I remember people like you saying the same thing when the PowerBook Duo came out 25 years ago.

apple_powerbook_2300c-side_closed.jpg

"To ... create ... this doorstop, we asked ourselves: what do consumers most want from a notebook? The answer, of course, is not a G5 processor, or a DVD drive, but weight. This beast will unapologetically burden even the toughest backpack.

Put simply, it's the heaviest PowerBook we've ever made."

jony-ive-10-20-09.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.