You could argue this is an actual improvement since it is now less obvious that you should even *try* to charge it from the iPad's port.Still, it's nice to have another chance to laugh at the design shambles that was the Apple Pencil 1.
You could argue this is an actual improvement since it is now less obvious that you should even *try* to charge it from the iPad's port.Still, it's nice to have another chance to laugh at the design shambles that was the Apple Pencil 1.
Is that so? Did a cable adapter exist for the 1st generation pencil when that existed? I don’t recall there being one. When the 1st generation pencil first came out and I bought it with my iPad Pro, the only way I could charge it was stick it to the iPad Pro (or an iPhone) because it required being plugged into the female side of the lightning connector.Well thats simply not true. Your could also charge it with a cable, just like almost every other stylus.
The 1st gen should have included an adapter for a lightning cable; you probably don't even need this new adapter to charge it form your iPad if you have a USB-C to Lightning cable. Plugging it into the iPad was a convenient alternative which meant you didn't need to bring that stuff with you.Is that so? Did a cable adapter exist for the 1st generation pencil when that existed? I don’t recall there being one. When the 1st generation pencil first came out and I bought it with my iPad Pro, the only way I could charge it was stick it to the iPad Pro (or an iPhone) because it required being plugged into the female side of the lightning connector.
F.o.r.c.e.d. U.p.g.r.a.d.e.s. - Stage manager only on M1. Face ID Horizontal only on iPhone 13. iPad Calculator only on M3.I still don’t understand why they can’t support the first gen Pencil on all the iPads. They now have this adapter so it must be just software. Sure it would be clunky but the first gen doesn’t HAVE to be charged from the iPad like the second gen.
The first gen came with just the adapter and an extra nib. I’ve got a picture right here.The 1st gen should have included an adapter for a lightning cable; you probably don't even need this new adapter to charge it form your iPad if you have a USB-C to Lightning cable. Plugging it into the iPad was a convenient alternative which meant you didn't need to bring that stuff with you.
There’s probably a difference in how the iPad scans for/receives the pencil signal, and they would have had to compromise in some way to support both at the same time.I still don’t understand why they can’t support the first gen Pencil on all the iPads. They now have this adapter so it must be just software. Sure it would be clunky but the first gen doesn’t HAVE to be charged from the iPad like the second gen.
I really don’t think that the camera is the true reason why they don’t have induction charging for the Apple Pencil 2.I don't need them to tell me to know that there isn't enough space above the camera and sensor bracket for the charger.
I don't think putting the pencil where you are most likely to hold the iPad is a very good idea, probably get in the way of your hand triggering TouchID. Would also block the side speakers.I really don’t think that the camera is the true reason why they don’t have induction charging for the Apple Pencil 2.
They could have moved the charger to the top of the iPad, in the same spot the camera was originally at.
I think this is a way for them to differentiate and not cannibalize their other products.
And you don't even need the new adapter if you use your phone's USB-C to Lightning cable. The new adapter exists so you can use the iPad's USB-C to USB-C cable.Or...create a small, cheap adapter that requires negligible engineering effort for a low end product, and ship it.
Feeling something like this is what Apple will do for the EU regulations, ie keeping the same .house while making users plug a ISB-C adaptor to the bottom of the mouse.
No, it's not just software - the data points you're connecting in your argument don't go together like that.I still don’t understand why they can’t support the first gen Pencil on all the iPads. They now have this adapter so it must be just software. Sure it would be clunky but the first gen doesn’t HAVE to be charged from the iPad like the second gen.
Ready for the stream of criticism.
That's what happens when you have your own opinion. Apple is a trillion dollar company. It's not like they can't make a couple of pens with USB-C ports. This is just about profit, taking a cheap stylus that's still in stock and eliminating the elaborate charger in the iPad.Of course. It appears to be a hobby of many here.
The adapter is shipping in new boxes of the 1st gen Apple Pencil, and is not needed for people who have Lightning-based iPads. Its only real use is for people buying the new 10th gen iPad who have an existing 1st gen Apple Pencil they want to use with it.Really bad. Atleast adequate stock of the adapter should have been made available.
People routinely overestimate the amount of product Apple keeps in stock. Tim Cook's first claim to fame was being a master of the production and supply pipeline, to make sure Apple always had enough stock of parts to build things, without too many manufactured units sitting around.This is just about profit, taking a cheap stylus that's still in stock and eliminating the elaborate charger in the iPad.
I still don’t understand why they can’t support the first gen Pencil on all the iPads. They now have this adapter so it must be just software. Sure it would be clunky but the first gen doesn’t HAVE to be charged from the iPad like the second gen.
No matter what reason. It is a cheaper version of the Pencil 2 and Apple didn‘t caee if the users can charge it or not.People routinely overestimate the amount of product Apple keeps in stock. Tim Cook's first claim to fame was being a master of the production and supply pipeline, to make sure Apple always had enough stock of parts to build things, without too many manufactured units sitting around.