Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
will you buy an ultra mostly for this reason though? the current mbp already are very expensive

It depends on the specs, the cost and whether or not it solves two main problems: My main problem with the current design of the MacBook Pro 16" is the weight. Then the sharp front edge. Of course we can do something with the edge but we need a redesign to get a lighter weight. If it will be similar in weight as the Air 15", I would consider.
 
I hate the fact that my thumb slightly touches the screen when I open my current laptop.

No way I want to put even more smudges on a screen. This seems like it would benefit greatly from nano texture glass.
Don't you use your fingernails to open the laptop? That's what I use.
 
What happens when the new MacBook Pro m6 will come after the ultra, they won’t always have the latest chip in them, or not update them the same time
 
More expensive than a MBP? Some MBP models are topping out over $4k. Who’s buying $5-6k laptop as a consumer? Absurd.
All my MBPs have cost ~$4-5k, since 2011. So as to "Who’s buying $5-6k laptop as a consumer? Absurd." I guess I am "Absurd."

But in answer to your question "Who’s buying $5-6k laptop as a consumer?" people who are at least sometimes mobile and do real work with their Macs where better performance means more a productive user. A $4k tool easily pays off over a 5-7 year life cycle if one is any kind of creative.

My MBP half the time drives a workstation with two 4K displays plus the MBP display. And many aware "consumers" can tell the big quality improvement with MBP displays and speakers; even those not needing MBP horsepower.

I could go on and on about how better hardware makes for a more productive user, but those who get it already know and those who do not get it will not be convinced by me.
 
Last edited:
te
It depends on the specs, the cost and whether or not it solves two main problems: My main problem with the current design of the MacBook Pro 16" is the weight. Then the sharp front edge. Of course we can do something with the edge but we need a redesign to get a lighter weight. If it will be similar in weight as the Air 15", I would consider.

the 16 is tempting with this big screen and resolution, but it costs 500 more, plus over 100 added costs for apple care+...

on the other hand, spending as much for a 14 ultra as I would for a 16 pro feels wrong.....
 
As long as MacBook Pro also gets the top of the line chip, memory and storage options, I’m okay with this.

I don’t need an OLED display or touch screen functionality. I just need heaps of memory and CPU+GPU power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Kim
The name seems very unlikely to me, all three of Apple‘s current MacBooks have three letters in the identifier name “Neo, Air, Pro”.
What *does* seem likely is that this new model will not replace what exists right now, but will sit above it, just like most other MacBook Pro redesigns of the past.
The retina MacBook Pro was introduced at the same time as updates to the standard MacBook Pro in 2012.
In 2016 the base MacBook Pro didn’t have a touch bar, and Apple kept the 2015 as an entry version.
In 2021 Apple kept the design of the base MacBook Pro the same until 2023, including the Touch Bar.
So that does seem quite likely.

Looks like we are about to get the MacBook ‘Top’
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mdcmdcmdc
What happens when the new MacBook Pro m6 will come after the ultra, they won’t always have the latest chip in them, or not update them the same time
That is a challenge Apple is facing across product lines. They badly want to stagger release dates, but it is a marketing challenge around "the latest chip in them" perception.
 
That is a challenge Apple is facing across product lines. They badly want to stagger release dates, but it is a marketing challenge around "the latest chip in them" perception.
While I get wanting the latest chip, from my perspective it doesn't matter that much. The year to year improvements in just the processor chips isn't much. If you update either because your machine is 4+ years or you want to move from say an Air to a Pro then a single year generation isn't the key factor in your decision. It tends to be more of an emotional issues rather than a real one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Kim
how will this even work, wouldn't the screen be a total mess with oily finger prints. For anyone who uses the iPad Pro without a screen protector, you clearly knows what the problem is. With iPad you just have to wipe it daily with cleaning solution. But to do that with a MacBook? feels wrong.
 
how will this even work, wouldn't the screen be a total mess with oily finger prints. For anyone who uses the iPad Pro without a screen protector, you clearly knows what the problem is. With iPad you just have to wipe it daily with cleaning solution. But to do that with a MacBook? feels wrong.
The way I see it is that either you don't need to use the touch screen and so get no finger prints or you do need/want to and so accept them and either use a screen protector or wipe the screen down. My car came with a radio I never use, but I'm ok with that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
My 16” MacBook Pro max from just two years ago went from being groundbreaking with amazing speed, performance, and everything else, to barely worth $1,000 on trade in because it is outdated and slow. Apple has elevated the concept of planned obsolescence to an art form.

There’s only so much money I’m willing to shell out to Apple. Im sticking with my two year old machine. At least Apple still supports it! 😝
Pure nonsense: "My 16” MacBook Pro max from just two years ago went from being groundbreaking with amazing speed, performance, and everything else, to barely worth $1,000 on trade in because it is outdated and slow."

I too own a 16” MacBook Pro M2 Max from two years ago and it is not "outdated and slow." If yours is, it is almost assuredly because you under-equipped when buying RAM and/or mass storage. Buy max available RAM next time if you want a long life cycle. I do.

This is tech, advancing all the time; a good thing. It is not some nefarious "Apple planned obsolescence." Sheesh. Expect hardware values to fall rapidly. Buy stamps or art or something if you want appreciation.
 
That would actually be a good compromise. Keep the MacBook Pros the way they are and introduce this as a MacBook Ultra. And it will make it easier to make it disappear again when Apple realizes that nobody needs OLED, a touchscreen or a thinner and lighter design.
I am curious as to why "the top-of-the-line" MacBook or "Ultra" would be a touch screen..? Would that be considered "the best" MacBook beyond the Pro? Anything is possible with Apple, but does not make sense.

Again...these are of course "rumors". I would not be surprised that a touch screen comes out (if it actually does) along the MacBook line, but not with M6 and considered "Ultra".

Again, anything is possible, but I am in the camp of "no touch screen" and will not buy one if it comes out.

I have used touch screens on Windows laptops before and just stop. Yes, some want it..and that is ok, but i will pass.

I hope they "just" have a side mac with this option. If they put it as an option on all of the MacBook Pros, this is seriously concerning..
 
Pure nonsense: "My 16” MacBook Pro max from just two years ago went from being groundbreaking with amazing speed, performance, and everything else, to barely worth $1,000 on trade in because it is outdated and slow."

I too own a 16” MacBook Pro M2 Max from two years ago and it is not "outdated and slow." If yours is, it is almost assuredly because you under-equipped when buying RAM and/or mass storage. Buy max available RAM next time if you want a long life cycle. I do.

This is tech, advancing all the time; a good thing. It is not some nefarious "Apple planned obsolescence." Sheesh. Expect hardware values to fall rapidly. Buy stamps or art or something if you want appreciation.
I am "still" using a 16" MacBook Pro M1 Max and it is not slow. Maybe people are addicted to speed..😂
 
I've been saying this all along: if Apple really releases a MacTouch or whatever it's gonna be called, it's gonna be a new product, with a new OS that will blend macOS and iPadOS.
a new OS only makes sense for a new product vertical

and MacOS already runs iPadOS apps, what would a new OS even accomplish?
 
I am curious as to why "the top-of-the-line" MacBook or "Ultra" would be a touch screen..? Would that be considered "the best" MacBook beyond the Pro? Anything is possible with Apple, but does not make sense.

Again...these are of course "rumors". I would not be surprised that a touch screen comes out (if it actually does) along the MacBook line, but not with M6 and considered "Ultra".

Again, anything is possible, but I am in the camp of "no touch screen" and will not buy one if it comes out.

I have used touch screens on Windows laptops before and just stop. Yes, some want it..and that is ok, but i will pass.

I hope they "just" have a side mac with this option. If they put it as an option on all of the MacBook Pros, this is seriously concerning..
I think the logic is that at the price point of the Ultra the incremental cost of making it a touch screen is very small so if you never ever use it then it's no big deal. Like the radio in my car that I never use. I don't mind that it's there even though I never use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert


Apple is planning to launch an all-new "MacBook Ultra" model this year, featuring an OLED display, touchscreen, and a higher price point, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports.

Apple-MacBook-Pro-M4-hero.jpg

Gurman revealed the information in his latest "Power On" newsletter. While Apple has been widely expected to launch new M6-series MacBook Pro models with OLED displays, touchscreen functionality, and a new, thinner design in the fourth quarter of 2026 for some time, Gurman today turned that rumor on its head with the suggestion that this is an all-new kind of MacBook rather than a MacBook Pro.

Instead of succeeding the newly announced M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros, the "MacBook Ultra" will be a new, top-tier Apple laptop. Gurman added that the device is likely to sit above the current M5 MacBook Pros, rather than replace them, suggesting that they will remain on sale.

This would enable a markedly higher price point for the new machines. Gurman noted that when Apple brought OLED displays to the iPhone X in 2017 and the iPad Pro in 2024, it simultaneously raised price by around 20%. As a result, Gurman believes a similar price increase on account of the MacBook's first ever OLED display may be likely and help move the MacBook Pro further upmarket.

Gurman says that this fits into a broader trend at Apple, where the company is seeking to offer more models at more price points, such as the new MacBook Neo at an unprecedented $599 price point to rival low-cost Windows and Chromebook devices. The same is occurring at the high-end, with more premium options available than ever before.

That is set to continue this year with the first foldable iPhone, featuring a ~$2,000 price tag, large inner display, and under-display sensors, and new AirPods priced above the current AirPods Pro at the top of the lineup with computer-vision cameras to feed Visual Intelligence data to Siri. Gurman even suggested that these products may be called the "iPhone Ultra" and "AirPods Ultra."

While the name "MacBook Ultra" is uncertain, Gurman is clearly no longer referring to the device as a MacBook Pro, instead referring to it as "the touch-screen and OLED high-end MacBook." He cautioned that Apple "could keep the traditional MacBook Pro name," but a MacBook Ultra moniker would "more clearly signal their position at the top of the lineup." Gurman expects the device to launch around the end of the year.



Article Link: Apple Planning 'MacBook Ultra' With Touchscreen and Higher Price
Take my money. Here take it. If it’s beautiful, super thin and with a touchscreen.. done amd done
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.