4.7" is the max size you could hope for on an SE with absolutely no bezels, assuming maintaining 16:9. So I don't know if that counts as ~5" to you. Closer to 4.5, isn't it?
Also I know a lot of people want to get rid of bezels on iPhones which makes sense but I argue not so on the SE. A bigger screen (despite being the same size body) will make it harder to use one-handed, particularly swiping from the screen top and bottom edges. And the main benefit of the SE sized iPhone is being able to easily use it one-handed.
Where are all the complainers about OLED now? Back when Samsung used it and Apple didn't there was a lot of resistance... now people are drinking the Apple kool-aid again it seems, as I predicted.
I am not saying I want the Samsung my question is hardware value. The Samsung can do oled for 750 why would I be paying 1000 for that what will apple add to this phone to close the gap. If it's just oled I will just get the normal plus model. I hope for that 1000 dollars I am getting something compelling because the market value for an entry-level oled is not 1000 as already seen in the industry. I don't mind paying a premium but it has to be within reason and I don't want to pay extra to loose Touch ID.Why asking yourself question you don't have the answer....just buy a samsung already, no need of waste other people time.
We have terrible image retention on all our 2012 iMacs at work. Ive been using OLED display phones since the Note 4 and I've not had burn-in once.I'm still not sold on OLED displays due to burn-in issues. The fact that Samsung, who has been using OLED displays for several years now, still has to do things like slightly move around UI features to avoid burn-in tells me that OLED durability, though improved, is still far too low. There's no way that Apple has somehow sourced superior displays from what Samsung is using, so I'll be sitting this year out to see what kind of display issues there are, if any.
And please, the average person cannot tell the difference between OLED & LED, nor will they ever know.
Thats just plain wrong. The last few generations of Samsung flagships have had the most accurate displays on the market. They just come setup out of the box on the Adaptive setting which bumps up the colours.What happened to Apple's investment in Micro LED? Nobody talks about that anymore.
Also, Apple displays usually have the most accurate calibration. How is that going to work with OLED? OLED displays on phones historically have blown out contrast and color saturation.
I'm still not sold on OLED displays due to burn-in issues. The fact that Samsung, who has been using OLED displays for several years now, still has to do things like slightly move around UI features to avoid burn-in tells me that OLED durability, though improved, is still far too low. There's no way that Apple has somehow sourced superior displays from what Samsung is using, so I'll be sitting this year out to see what kind of display issues there are, if any.
iPhone is late to OLED party because there no OLED panel manufacturers that can produce displays required (Qty) by Apple, Apple sells only 2 models of iPhones and volumes are huge compared to other manufacturers.Why Apple come so late to the OLED technology?
They were investing in an alternative technology (to OLED) years ago... A definitive failure?
No body has told this story yet...
It is a shame how old iPhones look compared to Samsung hardware...
The iPhone 8 at more than $1,000 for a piece of hardware similar (but one year later) than the Galaxy 8 is ridiculous.
Technology matures over time & companies like Samsung & LG who manufacture displays resolve Reliability & Quality issues over time ? I am sure OLED panels that Apple is using are not from 4 years ago.Where are all the complainers about OLED now? Back when Samsung used it and Apple didn't there was a lot of resistance... now people are drinking the Apple kool-aid again it seems, as I predicted.
Well, it's not really DNA touch ID so much as you better get used to licking your screen to unlock your phone.NEWSFLASH - iPhone 15 will use a photon display displaying a gazillion colours, DNA touch ID, x-ray vision, holographic projector and of course a 12MP camera with 25 lenses.
Hopefully one of them is an iPhone SE-sized model with a ~5" screen. If the screen is edge-to-edge so that it covers the entire front of the device, this should be possible.
We have terrible image retention on all our 2012 iMacs at work. Ive been using OLED display phones since the Note 4 and I've not had burn-in once.
Voice of reason. I never purchase any of apples first edition anything. We won't get touch ID embedded in the display this year, which will be worked out by 2018 and finally released in the new models
Neither is LCD/LED, nothing is perfect. However OLED has more upsides and is the superior tech overall. Burn-in is a non issue if you are aware of it, Plasma tv's had burn-in aswell but they had a better picture then any LED panel.Anecdotal much like your example, but just pointing out that OLED technology isn't perfect- yet.
Neither is LCD/LED, nothing is perfect. However OLED has more upsides and is the superior tech overall. Burn-in is a non issue if you are aware of it, Plasma tv's had burn-in aswell but they had a better picture then any LED panel.
Well, it's not really DNA touch ID so much as you better get used to licking your screen to unlock your phone.
Skin tones? Please tell me you weren't serious. "Sorry I didn't text you back right away, darling. I had to wash my make-up off so my iPhone would recognize my skin tone..."![]()
Quite possible (I didn't run the numbers), but I was intentionally not thinking about it from the perspective of limiting the aspect ratio to 16:9. In any case, I think that Apple will eventually offer an edge-to-edge ~5" screen. The article mentions 5.28", which if it proves to be true, and also if we are indeed talking about "bezel-less" phones for the entire 2018 range (admittedly a still very speculative point), would probably yield something close enough to iPhone SE size to be an effective replacement for that phone. Such a phone might be slightly wider than an iPhone SE (but for that matter perhaps slightly shorter too, depending on screen AR), but it should be close enough to serve as a device that's either just as easily pocketable as an iPhone SE or very nearly so.
Though you are correct in your point about one handed use, I suspect that for most users the draw to the iPhone SE is primarily the size of the device with usability benefits of the smaller screen being of lesser concern. It is true that some value easy one-handed use, but I don't think that population is big enough to keep an iPhone with a 4" screen around indefinitely.
Speaking only for myself, I switched from an iPhone 6 to an iPhone SE because I wanted a smaller device. It would have been even better if I didn't have to give up the bigger screen to make that change.
Oh I see, that's where we differ. I think the main advantage of the SE size is one-handed use and I assumed most think like me. Who knows, I could be wrong.