The major difference between "our" guesses and theirs is that they get paid very well for their guesses. Ridicule them all we want, but they are making money for something that we do for free.
If they call a phone a "Pro."They can if it's ~$1499 yet still sells wellie "iPhone Pro" a separate product line so to speak. I'm not convinced it will happen yet but it seems plausible.
I expect they are moving away from tick-tock
https://www.thoughtsonapple.net/single-post/2017/06/04/Post-9-iPhone-8-the-year-it-all-changes
What happened to Apple's investment in Micro LED? Nobody talks about that anymore.
Also, Apple displays usually have the most accurate calibration. How is that going to work with OLED? OLED displays on phones historically have blown out contrast and color saturation.
Touch ID works flawlessly in the dark. It has zero issue with skin tones.
Are you saying that Apple has invented a magical front facing camera that will be able to work as flawlessly as Touch ID does in any lighting condition imaginable with all possible skin tones? I have no problem believing that Apple has tech they are working on internally that's ahead of the competition, but this would be leaps and bounds more advanced than anything on the market today or expected to be released in the near future. We may see it one day. Just not in 2017.
And some of them are also 100% correct time and time again..
So we already know what the iPhone X will look like, it's design, and that it will ditch Touch ID. Now with these next iPhone rumours, I will imagine they'll ditch Touch ID also as that's how Apple does it. It won't support two types of technology, and has obviously decided not to bother with fingerprint scanners on the back, power button or underneath the screen.
Do these "analyst" guys just sit there making this stuff up?
This is the problem they're going to have if indeed they do release and iPhone 7s, 7s Plus and '8' this year. You'll have this 3 iPhone line up that'll need updating every year, and at some point they're going to have to bring it back down to two. Is it really worth it for the sake of this 'special' iPhone this year? At what point does it just become a normal iPhone? They can't have one special iPhone that's better than the other two, every year.
Why Apple come so late to the OLED technology?
They were investing in an alternative technology (to OLED) years ago... A definitive failure?
No body has told this story yet...
It is a shame how old iPhones look compared to Samsung hardware...
The iPhone 8 at more than $1,000 for a piece of hardware similar (but one year later) than the Galaxy 8 is ridiculous.
A lot of people, including professionals, don't believe that touch id is gone. You say we "already know," but we don't actually know yet.
Because the manufacturing process is inefficient and there is more demand than there is supply. And the 2 big players in the AMOLED space are Samsung and LG, who also make their own smartphones so they prioritize their own smartphones for the limited supply of the AMOLED panels.Why Apple come so late to the OLED technology?
I'm not in Court. I don't have to prove anything to you. We will all find out the answer in a few months and my point is onlyYou again? Post some links to prove your statement please. I mean KGI has a pretty solid reputation for being 100% accurate especially 2 months from launch. So please post your evidence that claims the opposite.....
This would be the best option for Apple's profits.The bad option would be Apple trying to go with an 'iphone pro' and having an even more expensive tier following the iphone 8..
Yep and the 2 candidates - LG and Samsung - produce their own competing smartphones. And now Google has invested heavily in LG's AMOLED division so that leaves Samsung.The problem for Apple has never been waiting for OLED to mature.
It's finding a supplier that can produce the huge, enormous, gigantic amount of panels it needs to satisfy demand.
Totally. The same will happen when iPhones get wireless and fast charging. Right now the iSheep say it is a useless feature. They will pee themselves with delight when they get it in an iPhone.Where are all the complainers about OLED now? Back when Samsung used it and Apple didn't there was a lot of resistance... now people are drinking the Apple kool-aid again it seems, as I predicted.
So will a lot of other people and the problem will be that they can't supply enough of them. Those saying $1200-$1500 is too much for a smartphone are just jealous that they can't afford it.I will outright say I'm willing to pay whatever price for a bezel less OLED iPhone.
Yep, my Galaxy Nexus that I bought in 2011 has a fantastic AMOLED display. Never had any burn in.It is mature enough from the first day... years ago. There is nothing wrong with the OLED displays of Apple's competitors.
Not true. My 2011 Galaxy Nexus has a beautiful display, no burn in. I still have it.No it never was.
I'm not in Court. I don't have to prove anything to you. We will all find out the answer in a few months and my point is only
that we don't know anything for certain yet (just think about all the reports that Touch ID is embedded in the back). Even Gruber, who is often right, disbelieves the rumor that there is no touchid.
Totally false. Anyone except the blind can immediately see the difference.And please, the average person cannot tell the difference between OLED & LED, nor will they ever know.
Exactly, touch ID doesn't work with gloves yet people still love it.I'd say there are more people wearing gloves than wearing motorcycle helmets. Point being, yes, motorcycle helmets are an argument against using only facial recognition but not a decisive one. If motorcycle helmets (or any kind of face covering, from surgical mask to ski mask) present the only major case when facial recognition definitely doesn't work, then that won't stop Apple from relying on facial recognition only, the same way fingerprint recognition not working with gloves did not stop them from relying on fingerprint recognition only.
Yep that's a smart business move. And all those iSheep who went on and on about LCD being better when iPhones didn't have it are going to eat crow.Apple is going to milk AMOLED as a premium-only feature for as long as it can.
Exactly. The only thing that is going to change is that the top tier is not going to start at $650 any more, that will be where the middle tier starts.While I understand what you are saying, the plateaus of "good, better, best" exist in homes and cars, etc., and have for quite some time now. Going back to when Apple launched the iPhone 5C, it became apparent that Apple was going to offer tiers based on affordability. IMO, that is not likely going to change.
Not many carriers offer subsidized phones on 2 year contracts anymore anyhow.This year is the first year I’m doing the apple payment plan thing because it’s too unclear what’ll happen next year so I don’t want to lock myself in for 2 years
Anyone mocked up an SE sized phone without bezels yet? You can have my money now for that phone
If you are tired of analyst and supply chain rumors, maybe you shouldn't spend your time at a website with "rumors" in its name.
Exactly. The only thing that is going to change is that the top tier is not going to start at $650 any more, that will be where the middle tier starts.
Why Apple come so late to the OLED technology?
They were investing in an alternative technology (to OLED) years ago... A definitive failure?
No body has told this story yet...
It is a shame how old iPhones look compared to Samsung hardware...
The iPhone 8 at more than $1,000 for a piece of hardware similar (but one year later) than the Galaxy 8 is ridiculous.
this times a thousand, having owned an SE for almost a year now I shutter at the thought of going to a bigger device again.Hopefully one of them is an iPhone SE-sized model with a ~5" screen. If the screen is edge-to-edge so that it covers the entire front of the device, this should be possible.