Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2 TB SSD DRIVE , wireless keyboard with backlit keys, 4 or 5K screen and a change to the physical design are needed
Not really a lot to ask as this is Apple
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
No, but knockoff Rolexes do not stop Rolex from selling watches. Rolex has a ton of variety within their product lines. One model can look the same as another, from a distance, but their prices can be 10-20k apart.

And, Rolex still sells both models.

OK. We'll see who's right.
 
I suggested this months ago, way back before Apple Watch launch and got told here, i was being stupid, Apple would never ever do this, and it will never happen, Apple would be wrong if they did this.

Let's see shall we :)
 
This is different. It makes no sense for Apple's sake to sell an anodized gold / rose gold Apple Watch Sport for $350 because it would demolish the exclusivity factor of buying the gold Apple Watch Edition. Why buy a $10,000 Apple Watch Edition when you can get a gold one for $350?
Somehow, I don't think someone who is in the market for the gold Apple watch would consider getting the gold colored sport instead.

I suspect that if there is a gold/rose gold sport, it won't be mistaken for an edition.
 
I hope they do something with the iPad Airs. I was waiting to get one this year. Faster processor or price drop or something to make it worth waiting for the new model.
 
How STUPID would apple be to make a gold/rose gold sports watch? Does anybody think anyone would buy an edition watch, if they are nearly indistinguishable from a sports watch?
Who is buying the Edition now? Whoever has that kind of money can tell the difference just the same as they can spot the difference between diamonds and cubic zirconia. Or know the difference between fine wine and supermarket $5 a bottle wine.

The gold aluminum watches are for those of us who wear the zirconia jewelry and drink grocery store wine and just want an Apple watch to match the rest of our gold jewelry we bought at the mall. o_O And that would be me!

I can afford either these days. Sometimes I splurge on the finer things and sometimes I economize. I'm hopelessly average and boring and my jewelry box is filled with an eclectic mix of expensive designer jewelry and cheap costume stuff that tickled my fancy on vacations or outings with friends.

While I could at some point in the not too distant future splurge on an Edition, I never would. I think the concept is just...well I mean beyond the case there's no added value. I just wouldn't, that's all. But I wouldn't mind a gold colored Apple Watch so on days I wear my gold wedding ring and my gold mall jewelry, I don't clash. That's all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arran
While I could at some point in the not too distant future splurge on an Edition, I never would. I think the concept is just...well I mean beyond the case there's no added value. I just wouldn't, that's all. But I wouldn't mind a gold colored Apple Watch so on days I wear my gold wedding ring and my gold mall jewelry, I don't clash. That's all.

I see. My most expensive watch cost about half of an Edition. But I'd never ever spend so much money on a watch that will be electric scrap in 1 or 2 years. I wanted the 'normal' watch first, but as I had to wait so long I went for the sport because the next one will be out in about 9 months now, I guess. AND I wanted a black one, but not with metal band... We'll see what comes next.
I didn't say nobody would buy a gold sports watch, I just said it would destroy their Edition marked.
 
I suggested this months ago, way back before Apple Watch launch and got told here, i was being stupid, Apple would never ever do this, and it will never happen, Apple would be wrong if they did this.

Let's see shall we :)

Same thing happened to me. I think they'll make sport models to match the iPhone colors. Absolutely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arran
There are Rolexes that are neither hand-crafted nor made with expensive materials. But still they don't sell golden fakes.
I can't discuss the finish of non-existing products, btw.

Why do you think an aluminum AWS is a "fake" of a gold AW Edition? They look entirely different.

Hell, the SS and the Aluminum sport look entirely different and feel different on the wrist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973 and Arran
I see. My most expensive watch cost about half of an Edition. But I'd never ever spend so much money on a watch that will be electric scrap in 1 or 2 years. I wanted the 'normal' watch first, but as I had to wait so long I went for the sport because the next one will be out in about 9 months now, I guess. AND I wanted a black one, but not with metal band... We'll see what comes next.
I didn't say nobody would buy a gold sports watch, I just said it would destroy their Edition marked.

Their Edition market is not the same as their Sport market. The Edition market are more likely to pick the SS instead of the Edition, yet they still made the SS. I base my evidence on celebrities who have been gifted with the AW who chose the SS model. Presumably because they don't like yellow or rose gold.

I don't see any celebs out choosing the Sport model for their free gift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Apple has no way to go with the Apple Watch. It is a failure because of the wrong marketing. They Apple watch was the product with more exposure and advertisement Apple ever had, not even the iPod nor the iPhone or any iMac. For the little it does and the impractical and no fashionable, Apple is trying hard to pretend it is a success... if I had a penny the times I have seen that in my field.

They should have released it as they did with the iPod (look for the iPod keynote), with no pretensions and let it get track itself. Not to mention the screen is tiny and clumsy, the bigger the better and more fun. Personally I like them big.
 
Apple has no way to go with the Apple Watch. It is a failure because of the wrong marketing. They Apple watch was the product with more exposure and advertisement Apple ever had, not even the iPod nor the iPhone or any iMac. For the little it does and the impractical and no fashionable, Apple is trying hard to pretend it is a success... if I had a penny the times I have seen that in my field.

They should have released it as they did with the iPod (look for the iPod keynote), with no pretensions and let it get track itself. Not to mention the screen is tiny and clumsy, the bigger the better and more fun. Personally I like them big.
You should rephrase that. It's not that Apple has no way to go. It's that you can't SEE any way for Apple to go.

Future iterations of the Apple Watch will have features and capabilities that make the first generation Watch seem primitive. But without the first generation to build upon, Apple couldn't build those future generations. Whichever one they built first would have been the first gen device, and you would most likely hate it anyway. So your opinion doesn't really signify. They're outselling all other smart watches. Some inexpensive fitness bands are holding their own, but none of them has a face big enough for you to consider it worthy of your wrist, so those don't really help your case.
 
Because time doesn't have corners.
I like round watches. I don't like square watches.
Nothing to compare with iPhone here and keyboards.

Your argumentation doesn't make sense. A smart watch is something entirely different than a regular watch. For all the functions that a smartwatch has (with maybe the exception of the traditional watch face that it could show) it makes sense to have a rectangular shape.

Just that you like or would prefer a round smartwatch, doesn't mean that from a logical point of view makes sense to the rest of the world. It doesn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amirite
I believe he has a real solid source, but either his source or Kuo himself always add a false prediction, so he always gets one thing wrong (for example fake rose / gold colors this time). This is either for protection, or simply for the sake of being foolish (I'd say it's a little bit of both).

I'm guessing be lives in Asia, in which case it wouldn't be tough to have multiple sources at the supper level would it? I'm surprised more info isn't leaked.
 
I see. My most expensive watch cost about half of an Edition. But I'd never ever spend so much money on a watch that will be electric scrap in 1 or 2 years.

The intended customer for the Edition Watch isn't someone who usually spends half as much (or less) on their watches and jewelry. More likely those who typically spend twice as much (or more) on their other watches (e.g. brands above mid models of Rolex), thus making an Edition an inexpensive experiment in comparison.
 
Last edited:
This will come. People are so short-sighted about this.
The current aWatch is the FIRST version of a NEW product category. This means Apple has to hold the public's hand every step of the way, show them how the new device is useful, and protect them from making errors they will regret.

But over two or three years, once we start seeing Apple watches in movies and in sitcoms, and it's clear that people understand the full concept (what it means to have a wrist computer, not just a fancy digital watch) they'll start to relax the rules on how you buy it, and the process will switch to something more like how you buy a phone today --- buy the iPhone model you want and buy the case (ie the colored accessory that adds your personalization) separately, from Apple or someone else --- and likewise for the watch body and strap.

That's a really big leap of faith you're making.

With other 'new categories' Apple has been successful in, the potential was easily seen from the beginning.

Mobile music existed....Apple just changed how it was consumed and ultimately how it was purchased. The buzz about the original iPod was there from the beginning and grew as the product grew.

The iPhone combined the iPod and the cell phone...and added and 'internet browsing device.' Again, people could see the potential of all these products that they liked. The product grew as it improved.

Skepticism around the original iPad was mostly around form factor ('It's just a big iPod Touch!), but success of the Apps was already there and people felt the buzz early.

The original complaints about most first generation Apple products have been price and specs. While the AW checks both of those boxes, the piece that seems to be missing is how the product fits into most peoples lives. Is it a fashion device or a functional device.

From a fashion perspective, it's an acquired taste at both. Most watch buyers seem to fall into people looking at a watch as an accessory (my wife and teenage daughter fit this category) and are looking to spend a modest amount and have many different 'looks' to go to. Serious watch buyers want to buy something that's fashionable...but also maintains a value. They seem to value quality timepieces they can keep for years. The AW doesn't appeal to either of these markets.

From a functional standpoint, the jury is still out. The AW just doesn't do enough to create a big buzz. There was some promise as a health device...but that quickly got flamed out. There is talk that the Watch ioS2 will somehow make 3rd party apps a lot more functional...but until that time it's a niche Apple product.

It'll sell a lot among hardcore Apple fans...but it won't mushroom as a must have consumer device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Forgive what may be a stupid question, but was just about to purchase an iMac to replace my 2009 model-
Does this news perhaps make it worthwhile to wait?
 
I predict a Gold and Black screen iPhone 6s to match Gold Apple Watch Sport.
 
Somehow, I don't think someone who is in the market for the gold Apple watch would consider getting the gold colored sport instead.

I suspect that if there is a gold/rose gold sport, it won't be mistaken for an edition.

If you compare the Gold Apple Watch to Gold iPhone it's different.. The edition is shinny.. Even the strainless is shinny..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.