Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I really hope this is true. We are just getting ready to get our daughter a mac mini. One cable would be awesome. Will hold off just a bit to see.
 
I think this is another situation of apple telling us what they think the standard is instead of letting it work itself out. I don't agree with their reasoning as this is something that is widely available on "windows" PC's with no issues.

HDMI is here, is the standard and they should support, end of story in my book.

Frankly, I can see the mac mini having an HDMI port as it is often used as a home theater component. Otherwise, I agree with Apple that Displayport should be the standard going forward.
 
I love my Mac.

I love my Mac Mini.

It is my second Mac. I sold my Macbook of the same specs to get the
Mini, 23" monitor, Apple Magic Mouse, Apple wireless kb, speakers,
desk, WD My Passport 500gb backup drive, and 4gb ddr3 upgrade, as well
as a 500gb HDD for the base mini i bought.

I do a lot of design work and am constantly in Adobe throughout my day.
I have found the Mac Mini to be the absolute best computer I have ever
known. Quiet, fast, aesthetically pleasing, and in a small form factor.

Most of all, I don't have to constantly plug and unplug a Macbook. For
my portable needs, as far as web browsing and eBay auctioning (my income
at the moment), the Dell Mini 10v I hackintoshed fulfills those needs nicely.

The monitor I have is a Acer H233H and it has all the popular inputs as
far as video goes, on the back. Yesterday I downloaded Plex to check it
out and I was in the process of moving things to try out my Mini on my
HDTV.. when i realized i didn't have a HDMI dongle.

Building in HDMI into the mini would streamline everything awesomely.

I think Apple should get rid of Apple TV. Personally I don't see the need.
For a few more hundred bucks, or even buying a used Mini, you have a far
more capable media center.

Plex is impressive.

I like it, and will keep it installed, but I don't see the need for it when my
Mini stays tethered to my desktop. If I get a newer Mac later this year
then I will possibly move the Mini to the TV, or sell it.

It's cool you can place your Apps into the Application section in Plex. I can
load an emulator and play some Zelda 2 on the HDTV, or launch safari
with my remote.


That is very cool.

I can see why the Mini shines in this regard. Gigs of Star Trek episodes at
my fingertips.. as well as the ability to launch a browser and check out
a website.. Too Cool.

I hope that Apple continues to show some love to this little guy. Upgrade
the specs! Put an ATI gaphics option in it if you have to, to get a great cpu.
Move on past the core2duo. Please.

Although 3.06GHZ C2D+8GB DDR3+7200drive would be pretty blissful!

Just my thoughts on this.. I really feel I got my money's worth when I
sold my MBP and got all this cool stuff.
 
I made some pictures to explain why, unless you use want to use the new HD surround tracks of blurays (like DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby TrueHD, which need to be streamed via HDMI only), the Mini is already usable as a media center.

Video

20100302-t4tgpaygpjjjbhtbsrhnt52u7k.jpg


20100302-e3s4xk5k2j1ckgg4g355eqpjmr.jpg


Audio

20100302-k769fgw4aafih692md4442x11.jpg


20100302-xrfrupu3stirwm7apbbun76k55.jpg


If you want Video+Audio on the same HDMI cable:

20100302-pmf93irbuxtj6f32rbe7xbbpnn.jpg
 
Ugh, VGA. Why PC manufacturers still insist upon putting that piece of **** port on every laptop is beyond me. Why can’t they get with the program? PowerBooks dropped VGA 8 years ago… :(
:rolleyes:

Many in the business world still use them to connect to video projectors. Yes, there are cables (e.g., Apple's mini-DVI to VGA, mini-DP to VGA), but many prefer to plug directly into the port without the need to carry an additional adapter. Projectors that have inputs in addition to VGA are still pricey.
 
Many in the business world still use them to connect to video projectors. Yes, there are cables (e.g., Apple's mini-DVI to VGA, mini-DP to VGA), but many prefer to plug directly into the port without the need to carry an additional adapter. Projectors that have inputs in addition to VGA are still pricey.

Is this a joke? Need to "CARRY" this?

20100302-fubstfiyscdyhuyrg5e6xs8ja.jpg


Is it a problem to """"carry"""" this in a bag?

This is non-sense.....

Sure you can forget it at home, but you can also forget your mouse or your head.....not that big of a deal. In exchange, you get a nice design and nice versatility from a single "hole in the chassis" which can give you 4 ports (VGA, DVI, HDMI, Display Port), the latter often not even available on many laptops of 2008, 2009 and even 2010.....
 
Is this a joke? Need to "CARRY" this?

20100302-fubstfiyscdyhuyrg5e6xs8ja.jpg


Is it a problem to """"carry"""" this in a bag?

This is non-sense.....

Sure you can forget it at home, but you can also forget your mouse or your head.....not that big of a deal. In exchange, you get a nice design and nice versatility from a single "hole in the chassis" which can give you 4 ports (VGA, DVI, HDMI, Display Port), the latter often not even available on many laptops of 2008, 2009 and even 2010.....

It is not nonsense when it avoids a problem. People forget adapters. Without the adapter, the presentation does not happen. For people who are not well organized and/or who are constantly on the go and under stress, it is easy to forget an adapter. In such cases, having a VGA port is foolproof. Remember, this is a business user, not a tech guru. For many business people, computers are a necessary evil.

That said, I carry adapters and prefer to do without the VGA port, but even still, I find the mini-DVI port on my MB does not provide as solid a connection as I would sometimes like. Perhaps mini-DP provides a better connection.
 
Seems if this is true that it may well be a nail in the AppleTV coffin.
This change with some good media software (ie. Plex, XBMC, MythTV,FrontRow) could easily replace the AppleTV.

I love my AppleTV but I'd really love to use a mac mini in it's place.

I do have a Mac Mini right now with DVI and have tried attaching it to my TV (Phillips 42") I've tried all kinds of tricks and DVI toHDMI cables/adaptors but for the life of me I can't get it working. (though my MacBook Pro, and PowerMac both connect fine)
Anyhow, I'm really hoping this would work better.

What's with all the good-byes to AppleTV?

Do you really think Apple, in today's economy, is going to make people who just want to watch iTunes content from the couch on a large screen buy a $600 Mini instead of a $229 media player?

Apple is going to use the $600 Mini to compete against all the other set-top media players (Vudu, Roku, Netflix capable Blu-ray boxes, etc.) as well as compete against all the new HD capable $200 Intel Atom/nVidia ION Net-tops?

Are you all serious?
 
@mosx

I've already debunked you HDMI-endorsing DP-failing crap in many other threads in the past, stop it.

HDMI is just DVI on steroids plus audio, DP allows for a whole new (better) way of building displays and internal communications and it's going to be the new standard of INTERNAL and EXTERNAL video communications in COMPUTERS. Back in 2008, if ONE port had to be chosen, it HAD to be DP and 2008-MBP users will be grateful for having such a future-proof interface in advance.

Users from 2008 with HDMI+VGA ports won't be able to use a 2560x1600 DP monitor... (unless they get a free replacement of their laptop with a new hdnm1.3 laptop, if they exist and if hdmi1.3 2560x1600 monitors exist, btw can you point to one? HDMI 1.3 smells like vaporware in the COMPUTER space...)

NO Cable box, DISH OR directv box has DP. They all have HDMI now.
 
It's about time. This has been missing for 2 years. It needs to be in ALL the models.
 
Apple TV is the right way to go for a home media center. I don't see the point of hooking up your $500+ Mac to your TV to become your media center just because the Apple TV doesn't have a web browser and email. It does have one thing thats absolutely better.... HDMI. lol

In fact, you can buy an Apple TV and a massive external hard drive for all your movies for less money than a Mac Mini.
 
Cinema Display

The more important aspect of this is the Cinema Displays. The 30" hasn't been updated in ages and the 24" is over a year old. It could be that the next revision of Cinema Displays would have HDMI connectors (with HDCP) allowing them to be much more useful (i.e. connecting a PS3 to them).
 
What the...?

HDMI would be GREAT!!! Any luck to see HDMI on incoming MBP...PLEASE!!!!!!
I do not really care about Blue Ray...

Why the hell would you want HDMI and not Blu-Ray? I am omitting the fact that you wrote it as "Blue Ray" but why would you want HDMI and not "Blue Ray?"
 
Scrambled opinions...

Seriously? Anyone making the decision between a mini and an ATV based on whether they need a $20 dongle to connect the mini to thier TV is an idiot.

Mini's still cost 2-3x what an ATV costs and Mini's still do WAY more... server? ARD? Screen Sharing?

That'd be like choosing between a motorcycle and a minivan based on the size if the tires...

You sir, write a VERY confusing post. First you state that the only thing different between ATV and a mini is a $20 dongle. Oh- and that whoever decides that is an idiot...?

Next you state that mini's cost 2-3x more than an ATV but mini's have more functionality. So are you just stating the obvious? You made it sound like the price wasn't justified for the increased functionality.

Finally, after absorbing all these scrambled thought, you stated that choosing between one of them is "like choosing between a motorcycle and a minivan based on the size if the tires," but you don't state which one you think is the motorcycle and which is the minivan.

The point of my post is this- Get your s**t straight and write a cohesive post or just skip posting next time and just rate the article. Thanks.
 
Well, this could be good, bad or ugly news.

Good: Intel stop being arses and we get ION2 and Corei3/5 minis

Bad: Intel carry on being arses and we get Core2Duo and ION2

Ugly: Intel carry on being arses and we get Corei3/5 minis with Intel graphics

I'm hoping for good but fearing the worst

The "Good" scenario would be buying a computer with a graphics chip that is used for a netbook? Really...? Those are some pretty low expectations you have there. I'd actually like a decent video card in here if you ask me.
 
Too true.

Im not sure HDMI can be considered the "next level." More like playing catch-up with the rest of the industry.

Agreed! AND. Leaving out Blu-Ray??? Really? Steve's "bag of hurt" excuse is way too old, and by the way, a false lazy excuse to not to include it.:mad:
 
Haven't been updated??

I'm looking to get a new Mac soon but Apple's range (at the moment) looks rather poor. Mac Pro and MacBook Pro lines haven't been updated in an age.

The MacBook pro lines haven't been updated? Are you serious? They may not have the brand new Core 2010 CPU's but have you forgotten that they changed to a unibody construction with switchable graphics, a glass screen, and robust glass multi touch trackpad? Apple has increased their CPU's in either clock speed or new generations or both. Although with the new CPU's, benchmark scores are insignificant. The Core 2010 CPU's will most likely be the biggest jump in benchmark scores in the last 5 years if you believe the "leaked" geek bench score from earlier February. BTW- that glass multi touch trackpad is awesome, and NO COMPUTER currently can even come remotely close to matching it in effectiveness.

I rest my case.:cool:
 
I wonder how long it will take for people to start hating on HDMI because of it's absence from mac and instead extol the virtues of all those overpriced adaptors. :eek:
 
Agreed.

Let me say this just to anyone from Apple reading this: a Mac mini with a faster Core 2 Duo, GeForce 9400M, and HDMI would be better than ANY Mac mini with a Core i3, Intel GPU, and HDMI. The GMA 950 Mac minis were a huge step backward from the Radeon 9200 powered G4 Mac minis. Don't take that step backward again. The 9400M is still faster than any Intel GPU, and a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 9400M would be a better combination than a Core i3 and Intel GPU. A Core i3 might be slightly faster than a Core 2 Duo, but that doesn't matter when you're cutting one of its legs off by pairing it with Intel integrated graphics.

Sound logic. Although, if the leaked geek bench benchmarks are true, the Core 2010 CPUs score MUCH higher (like 30-40%) computational power than their C2D brethren.

Instead, let's hope that Apple decides to not intentionally cripple this device like most in their line up. *Sorry Steve. I love my Mac and continue to support Apple, but stop skimping on your hardware. It's getting old and pissing me off. Not that I'd use Windows ever again, but when YOU leave out basic necessities, you create the hackintosh community. I don't have a hackintosh now, so don't force me.*

If Apple puts a Core 2010 CPU, Blu-Ray, HDMI, and dedicated graphics into this, I'll knock out the first person in line at the Mac store and take his spot.
 
:rolleyes:

HDCP has been around for years via DVI and was recently added to DisplayPort as of 1.1. You don't need HDMI to implement HDCP.

Apple first began implementing HDCP with the Apple TV in March of 2007. It was also added to the refreshed MacBook and MacBook Pro line as of October 2008, and has slowly made its way into all currently shipping Macs.

http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2008/11/apple-brings-hdcp-to-a-new-aluminum-macbook-near-you.ars

Most iTunes HD movies, rentals and TV shows require HDCP to playback on an external monitor. Otherwise, you get the attached error.

Personally, I hope HDCP dies in favor of a more consumer-friendly DRM technology.



The huge price difference, $599 compared to $229, will keep that from happening for a long time.

I loves to be skooled by the smarties. My bad.
 
hmm.. maybe I shouldn't have rushed into my mac mini purchase last week ;)

Oh well whats done is done.:D

Being a macrumors.com reader you should have know that Apple should be releasing updated versions of almost all their popular lines. MBP, Mac Pro, iPhone etc. I mean- just read the buyer's guide!

Oh well. I feel your pain. Then again, these COULD just be rumors and you'll have had more time to enjoy a Mini than I. Although, to be honest, the reason I haven't picked up a mini is because it's inherently crippled. No HDMI or Blu-Ray?? Once Apple releases that, they'll have more of my money.

@mosx
I've already debunked you HDMI-endorsing DP-failing crap in many other threads in the past, stop it.

HDMI is just DVI on steroids plus audio, DP allows for a whole new (better) way of building displays and internal communications and it's going to be the new standard of INTERNAL and EXTERNAL video communications in COMPUTERS. Back in 2008, if ONE port had to be chosen, it HAD to be DP and 2008-MBP users will be grateful for having such a future-proof interface in advance.

Sorry... your logic may be sound but in actuality, DP just isn't getting adopted/used. HDMI has permeated EVERYTHING and has quickly become a relatively new sought after standard. HDMI should be included hands down.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.