Frankly, I can see the mac mini having an HDMI port as it is often used as a home theater component. Otherwise, I agree with Apple that Displayport should be the standard going forward.
The huge price difference, $599 compared to $229, will keep that from happening for a long time.
It's Blu-ray. Also HDMI is a bag of hurt, and so is BR
This makes no sense at all. Two types of interfaces which do the exact same thing.
Ugh, VGA. Why PC manufacturers still insist upon putting that piece of **** port on every laptop is beyond me. Why cant they get with the program? PowerBooks dropped VGA 8 years ago
![]()
Many in the business world still use them to connect to video projectors. Yes, there are cables (e.g., Apple's mini-DVI to VGA, mini-DP to VGA), but many prefer to plug directly into the port without the need to carry an additional adapter. Projectors that have inputs in addition to VGA are still pricey.
Is this a joke? Need to "CARRY" this?
![]()
Is it a problem to """"carry"""" this in a bag?
This is non-sense.....
Sure you can forget it at home, but you can also forget your mouse or your head.....not that big of a deal. In exchange, you get a nice design and nice versatility from a single "hole in the chassis" which can give you 4 ports (VGA, DVI, HDMI, Display Port), the latter often not even available on many laptops of 2008, 2009 and even 2010.....
Seems if this is true that it may well be a nail in the AppleTV coffin.
This change with some good media software (ie. Plex, XBMC, MythTV,FrontRow) could easily replace the AppleTV.
I love my AppleTV but I'd really love to use a mac mini in it's place.
I do have a Mac Mini right now with DVI and have tried attaching it to my TV (Phillips 42") I've tried all kinds of tricks and DVI toHDMI cables/adaptors but for the life of me I can't get it working. (though my MacBook Pro, and PowerMac both connect fine)
Anyhow, I'm really hoping this would work better.
@mosx
I've already debunked you HDMI-endorsing DP-failing crap in many other threads in the past, stop it.
HDMI is just DVI on steroids plus audio, DP allows for a whole new (better) way of building displays and internal communications and it's going to be the new standard of INTERNAL and EXTERNAL video communications in COMPUTERS. Back in 2008, if ONE port had to be chosen, it HAD to be DP and 2008-MBP users will be grateful for having such a future-proof interface in advance.
Users from 2008 with HDMI+VGA ports won't be able to use a 2560x1600 DP monitor... (unless they get a free replacement of their laptop with a new hdnm1.3 laptop, if they exist and if hdmi1.3 2560x1600 monitors exist, btw can you point to one? HDMI 1.3 smells like vaporware in the COMPUTER space...)
HDMI would be GREAT!!! Any luck to see HDMI on incoming MBP...PLEASE!!!!!!
I do not really care about Blue Ray...
Seriously? Anyone making the decision between a mini and an ATV based on whether they need a $20 dongle to connect the mini to thier TV is an idiot.
Mini's still cost 2-3x what an ATV costs and Mini's still do WAY more... server? ARD? Screen Sharing?
That'd be like choosing between a motorcycle and a minivan based on the size if the tires...
Well, this could be good, bad or ugly news.
Good: Intel stop being arses and we get ION2 and Corei3/5 minis
Bad: Intel carry on being arses and we get Core2Duo and ION2
Ugly: Intel carry on being arses and we get Corei3/5 minis with Intel graphics
I'm hoping for good but fearing the worst
Im not sure HDMI can be considered the "next level." More like playing catch-up with the rest of the industry.
I'm looking to get a new Mac soon but Apple's range (at the moment) looks rather poor. Mac Pro and MacBook Pro lines haven't been updated in an age.
Let me say this just to anyone from Apple reading this: a Mac mini with a faster Core 2 Duo, GeForce 9400M, and HDMI would be better than ANY Mac mini with a Core i3, Intel GPU, and HDMI. The GMA 950 Mac minis were a huge step backward from the Radeon 9200 powered G4 Mac minis. Don't take that step backward again. The 9400M is still faster than any Intel GPU, and a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 9400M would be a better combination than a Core i3 and Intel GPU. A Core i3 might be slightly faster than a Core 2 Duo, but that doesn't matter when you're cutting one of its legs off by pairing it with Intel integrated graphics.
HDCP has been around for years via DVI and was recently added to DisplayPort as of 1.1. You don't need HDMI to implement HDCP.
Apple first began implementing HDCP with the Apple TV in March of 2007. It was also added to the refreshed MacBook and MacBook Pro line as of October 2008, and has slowly made its way into all currently shipping Macs.
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2008/11/apple-brings-hdcp-to-a-new-aluminum-macbook-near-you.ars
Most iTunes HD movies, rentals and TV shows require HDCP to playback on an external monitor. Otherwise, you get the attached error.
Personally, I hope HDCP dies in favor of a more consumer-friendly DRM technology.
The huge price difference, $599 compared to $229, will keep that from happening for a long time.
hmm.. maybe I shouldn't have rushed into my mac mini purchase last week
Oh well whats done is done.![]()
@mosx
I've already debunked you HDMI-endorsing DP-failing crap in many other threads in the past, stop it.
HDMI is just DVI on steroids plus audio, DP allows for a whole new (better) way of building displays and internal communications and it's going to be the new standard of INTERNAL and EXTERNAL video communications in COMPUTERS. Back in 2008, if ONE port had to be chosen, it HAD to be DP and 2008-MBP users will be grateful for having such a future-proof interface in advance.