Not if you turn on automatic updates in Software Update system preferences.
Thanks mate!
Not if you turn on automatic updates in Software Update system preferences.
Not a chance. Apple couldn't even if they wanted to. iOS apps are built specifically for ARM processors, so would run unbearable slowly on desktop processors. Also, Apple's been careful to separate apps built for touch devices and desktop. They're not going to break that.
Nope... this program isn't for paid developers. You wouldn't get Mountain Lion free for testing 10.8.1 or 10.8.x. You must already have Mountain Lion to test those.
btw: although Facebook integration would be good. IOS has it, and since the Mac is getting much the same stuff nowadays, why not ? Maybe, in a form of a widget, or something... recoded of course to work on the Mac.
Ok, so as a paid OS X ADC member (since 10.2), how are they picking people to participate? I have never seen Apple randomly chose a consumer for a 10.x.x beta. Yes, sometimes they invite consumers into the ADC program, but this is something unusual. If they don't offer this to paid developers, that is a major issue.
The iOS simulator built into Xcode works faster than a real iPhone. That said, I still don't think Apple would do something like that.
Nope, FB is a separate install which has been available to developers since before 10.8 was released. Probably just fixes that were lower priority than what made it into the .1 release.
I suspect one more quick beta and a release soon after that. The last .1 beta still had "TBA" in the installer text.
That because it does not emulate an ARM-Processor but XCode compiles the apps for Intel-Processors and then runs them on the Simulatorversion of iOS 8which is also x86).
I'd imagine that means 10.8.1 is in a golden state so that they could begin to develop off of it. Wouldn't want to build a beta off a beta!
Why would you want apps designed for a touch screen on your non touch screen Mac?
Do Apple usually put loads of exclamation marks in notices like these? Doesn't seem very Apple... (maybe I'm just being pedantic)
I could never really pass myself to see the difference between Siri and dictation.
Couldn't Apple just have expanded dictations ability to Internet use vs needing another one called "Siri" just for this in addition ?
Nope... this program isn't for paid developers. You wouldn't get Mountain Lion free for testing 10.8.1 or 10.8.x. You must already have Mountain Lion to test those.
the difference is simple. dictaion means you have to know where you're going to find stuff, siri does it for you
Oh. When I went to the developer site, it said that Mountain Lion was in the Mac Dev Center, and to enter that, I need a full membership, right?
Obviously, Apple did not think about this when they implemented Launchpad for OS X...
Do Apple usually put loads of exclamation marks in notices like these? Doesn't seem very Apple... (maybe I'm just being pedantic)
Thats my point. Why work on two dot upgrades at the same time? Why not just make a solid dot upgrade.
Nope... this program isn't for paid developers. You wouldn't get Mountain Lion free for testing 10.8.1 or 10.8.x. You must already have Mountain Lion to test those.
Read the first line again. It says 'developers', not 'users'.
Ok, so as a paid OS X ADC member (since 10.2), how are they picking people to participate? I have never seen Apple randomly chose a consumer for a 10.x.x beta. Yes, sometimes they invite consumers into the ADC program, but this is something unusual. If they don't offer this to paid developers, that is a major issue.
Where is the FB? I looked at the developer downloads all the way back to Feb. and did not see it!
Do Apple usually put loads of exclamation marks in notices like these? Doesn't seem very Apple... (maybe I'm just being pedantic)
ya i know the difference, but what i mean is dictation could be expanded to this couldn't it ?
eg: you start of with diction, and add Internet use of this to the point it would be server based. Rather than .. keep dictation, and its easier just to bring out another diction like called Siri, it "proves much better"
..the point is, if they improved dictation, then "it" could easily be Siri wouldn't it?
Thats my point. Why work on two dot upgrades at the same time? Why not just make a solid dot upgrade.