Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Family Guy era of pointlessly offensive non-humor is officially dead! Seth McFarlane is seething and coping.


1E7B8B61-4462-4529-BD9D-E923A2EDD8E1.jpeg
 
Yes, fictitious. The real story is simple:
Bottom line - Blevins made the rest of the apple senior execs look like a bunch of as****es by association.

To fix this, the execs decided to stop associating with him.

Nobody in the public knows him as an apple exec. You wouldn't recognize him if he ran over your dog.

But the Apple people who did, took such great offense, took a joke in a private event and turned it into a public problem. Apple was therefore forced to address it.
 
High level execs at public companies have certain standards to maintain at all times because they are the faces of the company. They get tons of media training, and are taught how to act in public, particularly with a camera in their face.

Regardless if the joke was funny or the punishment was too harsh, he failed at one of his basic duties to represent Apple. Some may say that's unfair in his 'off' time, but it's par for the course as a high level exec in a big company and one of the many reasons they are paid so much.
 
High level execs at public companies have certain standards to maintain at all times because they are the faces of the company. They get tons of media training, and are taught how to act in public, particularly with a camera in their face.

Regardless if the joke was funny or the punishment was too harsh, he failed at one of his basic duties to represent Apple. Some may say that's unfair in his 'off' time, but it's par for the course as a high level exec in a big company and one of the many reasons they are paid so much.

He's not exactly Eddie Cue or Craig Federighi in public visibility. And he wasn't interviewed by Forbes either. As an supply chain guy in a private setting with a rando asking about the car, he would not have reasonable expectation the video would blow up.
 
Did he publish that on tiktok himself, as a visible representative of Apple?

Would be nice if you had to get signed consent to publish a private citizen on the net, especially when addressing them directly. Regardless of his position at Apple he is still a private citizen, not a politician and what he has to say at a car show has nothing to do with the public interest.

After all, one needs consent for other things.....

 
Last edited:
Welcome to a more connected world. No one made this guy go talk about anything in TikTok. Keeping your mouth shut is essentially the “back in the day” you’re describing, and it’s still a totally valid option now. People are perfectly within their rights to stop broadcasting their bad opinions and jokes and whatever else they get tempted to put out into the world. That’s why no one ever got cancelled back in the day, no one knew about the awful things they’re said.

Pro tip - if you don’t want backlash for saying something people don’t like, don’t say it on camera. Don’t tweet it. Don’t put it on YouTube. You’re now living the uncancellable lifestyle of your great grandparents. Enjoy.

Pro tip - people need to grow a backbone so they stop being offended by everything. The VP and what he did is not the problem, the problem is with those who think/believe he did wrong. If people honestly believe the man should have been fired for what he said then it just goes to show how regressed society has become. He was not rude, he was not insulting, he did not break any law but yet he was fired. What a shameful society it is today.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.