Don't feel sorry for me or any child I know / have met, but I was dead serious, it is impossible to clean the internet.
Does that mean
I approve child pornography? Definetly not, so I don't know what are you fighting against (windmill perhaps?).
You should learn not to assume things as I do not approve that kind of content as you imply, perhaps if you came down from the pedestal you built yourself to look people from up above you might learn that the world is not all black and white.
I didn't imply nor assume ... if you read my posting correctly you'd see I was in particular quoting "ss.soulbeat" who's bad taste joke was quite ill. That said your joke or statement that Apple 'should shut down the internet' wasn't a helpful one. I get that you meant it maybe futile to police, but I think doing nothing like Google did on Android for this instance/situation would show they didn't care to even bother trying. I'd still say your post was done without taste, ignoring the fact Apple at least made a difference to try vs over generalizing the issue and saying hey the internet cannot be policed. See the difference, it's all in perception, leaving it so open can be infered quite widely.
The fact remains, will removing this app solve the issue? NO!
-
seems Apple did solve the issue, first by removing the app and then reporting to authorities and having the members that did this be banned before allowing it to be available again.
will users that want to see that kind of content use another app? YES!
- unfortunately so ...you're definitely right there, sadly so in this world.
Instead of removing app, they should let people report users with such behaviour, and then denounce them to the police, no need to ban the app.
-
All the while allowing the sharing, trading of (which is a further result of sexual/physical abuse of miners to continue)?! Sure I get your method could find more of those sicko's over a short and long run, so either practice is a better or for worse choice.
I repeat myself:
You do not forbid Ford from selling cars because 1 guy ran over people with a Ford, you arrest the guy!
-
This isn't so simply compared. I'd like to think of this as a car with faulty brakes. There was more than one user in this situation. By my comparison related to your analogy ... anyone could've been driving such a car and anyone could've been hurt. ...
So BAN the user not the app!
So stop the car from being sold, make a recall for repairs, make changes to fix the issue, once fixed allow the car to be sold and driven once again.
Nothing, because it is not Android (well Alphabet) responsability, it is Telegram's.
- Nothing done. Yes Telegram's responsibility, but Alphabet didn't even report anything ... that's the takeaway to consider. Maybe this is a difference of opinion here and potentially nature of where we both live.
Ex. (off topic but comparable for perception here:
In Canada seeing someone die where you're able to help, and you don't: that's a crime by law.
In the USA only certain states this is a crime, helping someone could also lead a US citizen to be sued in civil court as well.)
Telergrams responded and made appropriate moves as expected and rightfully so, but it was their responsability not Alphabet or Apple!
- Agreed. The responsibility isn't what's being debated, not by me. It's doing the right thing that I'm happy about.
Sorry you feel differently about jokes on this topic as I do. My honest mistake, as I have to realize not everyone thinks, feels, nor sees topics/situations the same as I would/do/will. I'll be much more mindful in the future.