I have nothing to contribute to this thread except for the fact that I'm now hungry. Thanks DT.
I welcome our newest addition to PRSI. You will fit right in here.
What is a PRSI? Also, I heard additives are bad. Can I be organic instead? I'm not stewing in my own body odor for fun. I smell like a Chinaman.
Sorry, this is a political spiritual social forum - I meant Chinacis.
Maybe you can find someone on craigslist to help you out with those questions, just make sure you don't take your laptop if you have to meet up with them.
Maybe you can find someone on craigslist to help you out with those questions, just make sure you don't take your laptop if you have to meet up with them.
I have nothing to contribute to this thread except for the fact that I'm now hungry. Thanks DT.
I prefer cake, pie wise it needs to be a Boston cream pieYou can't lick that PRSI!
I don't know why this created its own post - my apologies?
I'm confuzzled. I just know that Apple is good and so is America and something about pie, which takes us right back to the PRSI. My head hurts.
I'm gonna quit now.
I prefer cake, pie wise it needs to be a Boston cream pie![]()
![]()
“WTF do PIES have to do with CHINA!?!”
What they don't have chicken feet pie in China?
I like Chinese, if I'm ever single again I might date one or 10![]()
They just work really hard for us and can actually SURVIVE on food we only order out like once every couple of weeks, and even it's pretty cheap, just like all of them who aren't as good as us.
Tim respect privacy....lol
Hiding? Nah. I don't want my isp to spy everything i do.Apple in China is just complying to their rules.. Thank goodness its not everywhere.
"Recently the government also threatened to block access to the Telegram encrypted messaging platform unless the company that runs the app provides more information about itself."
Everyone would see this as privacy, but really. it you don't explain yourself, doesn't that conclude u as hiding something, therefore you are up to no good ? However, without proof, you really don't have a say.
Denying an abortion is nowhere near as bad as forcing one on someone. I'm sorry that you don't see that.
They are both wrong, but equally? Definitely not. Picture a woman kicking and screaming as doctors force her down and pull the life from her womb, and then compare that with a pregnant woman, who wants to get an abortion, but is deeply saddened by someone who tells her she can't. There is no comparison, unless you're some kind of monster.I am sorry that you dont see them both as being equally wrong.
They are both wrong, but equally? Definitely not. Picture a woman kicking and screaming as doctors force her down and pull the life from her womb, and then compare that with a pregnant woman, who wants to get an abortion, but is deeply saddened by someone who tells her she can't. There is no comparison, unless you're some kind of monster.
The world needs cheap labor - China supplies it ......
Tragic, but you're missing the keyword here: "Chose". The girls in China, who are humans too by the way, do not have a choice. It's a sort of rape, you might say, since it's forced upon them.Yeah its so trivial for the girls involved the they are willing to choose illegal abortions with high risks of complications and potentially death or they even suicide. And yeah, I knew someone who chose suicide.
Yes, you are totally right in saying that we are not understanding each other. You insist in talking about legal validity and efficiency, while I'm focusing in privacy. Of course both electronic and paper-ink contracts have the same legal validity!! That's not the point. The point is that the world would be much better if it was so extremely hard, inconvenient, and difficult for a company to get all the paper documents needed for storing your private data, that they would desist in doing so. That's my only point. If it wasn't allowed by Law that a button click in a webpage was enough for storing the user data in the company servers, most companies would desist in storing your data, and so alternative mechanisms would be used instead (such as storing all your data in your computer and making companies read it from your disk on a transaction-by-transaction basis).No, you don't understand. There are two kinds of contracts: verbal and express. Express means there is written word and you "sign" to show you agree with those words in the document. There is zero difference between physically signing an agreement that states a company can store user data and one that is electronically signed. ZERO.
A contracts is an agreement by two more parties. All parties must agree to the writing (among other elements) for it to be valid. In your instance it's up to the user to understand what he or she is agreeing to before they give consent be it with pen and hand or keyboard and fingers.
So what you are talking about is sheer gobbledygook. It makes no sense from either a public policy perspective, a legal perspective, or an efficiency perspective.
Yes, you are totally right in saying that we are not understanding each other. You insist in talking about legal validity and efficiency, while I'm focusing in privacy. Of course both electronic and paper-ink contracts have the same legal validity!! That's not the point. The point is that the world would be much better if it was so extremely hard, inconvenient, and difficult for a company to get all the paper documents needed for storing your private data, that they would desist in doing so.