Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This just in: Apple moving their entire operation to the Proxima Centauri solar system.
Suddenly it makes a lot more sense why The Jetsons have a house that looks like this:
IMG_3598.png
 
Yeesh. Let's try to make it so no company can have more than 0.01% of market share in any country in the entire world, and all software is free. The world will be full of butterflies and rainbows.

When countries apply rules to people and companies, is that expanding freedom or curtailing it? In what way?

Ok, back to my Blackberry. Remember them? Monopolies only last while they are good. No government regulation was required to cause their collapse. Whatever. Attack like the youth of today.
 
Yeesh. Let's try to make it so no company can have more than 0.01% of market share in any country in the entire world, and all software is free. The world will be full of butterflies and rainbows.

You are making unrealistic assumption. No one is trying to make no company have 0.01% market share.

When countries apply rules to people and companies, is that expanding freedom or curtailing it? In what way?

In this case, it expanding freedom for users. I am all for torn up the walled garden.

Ok, back to my Blackberry. Remember them? Monopolies only last while they are good. No government regulation was required to cause their collapse. Whatever. Attack like the youth of today.

Blackberry was never a monopolies. Back then, we have Nokia Symbian, BlackBerry OS, Windows Phone 8, WebOS.

What do we have now? iOS and Android. If a government to mandate third OS and mandate all developers to port apps, I am all for it.

A market where one company takes 80%-90% profit and have market power to dictate things to its favor is never a good thing.
 
India is a protectionist country. They don't play on a level playing field. They also bought Russian oil when everyone else boycotted them because of the Ukraine invasion. That tells you all you need to know about India.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
When countries apply rules to people and companies, is that expanding freedom or curtailing it? In what way?
When Apple applies their rules to people, is that expanding freedom or curtailing it?

If Apple doesn't like the rules, Apple can go build and develop their own country. Isn't that what people tell others who want to be able to sideload and do other things? "Don't like it, then go build and develop your own smartphone and app store, or buy an Android device."

What's good for the goose...
 
India is a protectionist country. They don't play on a level playing field. They also bought Russian oil when everyone else boycotted them because of the Ukraine invasion. That tells you all you need to know about India.

US is also protectionist country, look at all these trade restrictions and tariffs that US is applying.

And only US and its allies are not buying oils from Russia. Cheap oil is always good buy, for national securities and cheap gas for citizens.
 
You are making unrealistic assumption. No one is trying to make no company have 0.01% market share.



In this case, it expanding freedom for users. I am all for torn up the walled garden.



Blackberry was never a monopolies. Back then, we have Nokia Symbian, BlackBerry OS, Windows Phone 8, WebOS.

What do we have now? iOS and Android. If a government to mandate third OS and mandate all developers to port apps, I am all for it.

A market where one company takes 80%-90% profit and have market power to dictate things to its favor is never a good thing.
Your definition of monopoly is curious. If you control 95% of the market share of phones, and don't allow any third party protocols, is that a monopoly? Apple has very little market share in the vast majority of the world.

And is it currently impossible for other companies to make phones? With an OS? If Apple controlled all phone networks and sold the phones I'd call that a monopoly, such as the old gas empire in the us where the entire line was controlled from product source to sales by a single company.

But I guess monopoly has a new meaning. Anyone that makes money with a good product that controls less than 20% of worldwide phones needs to be reduced. Is that what should happen?

Let's face it, people can buy any phone they want, but for some reason people just don't want to. I guess they like the better product.

Let companies sink or swim, and only try to control when they truly control the market they are in. If Apple would buy the majority of telecom service providers and then restrict them to only iphones, then I'd have an issue. Otherwise, no.
 
When Apple applies their rules to people, is that expanding freedom or curtailing it?

If Apple doesn't like the rules, Apple can go build and develop their own country. Isn't that what people tell others who want to be able to sideload and do other things? "Don't like it, then go build and develop your own smartphone and app store, or buy an Android device."

What's good for the goose...
Lol. I don't see any rules Apple applied to me. They never said I can't buy a Samsung or BlackBerry.
 
P.s. India has a law that requires a company that wants to do business in country to manufacture (I believe it is 75%) a majority share of what is sold in country.

I want this law in the USA and in the EU. Just think how great it would be if companies had to build their products in the countries they sold them in. /s

P.s.s. I also remember a story from last year I think that said in the early phase of building the newer phones there 1 of every 2 phones was meeting Q/A standards. Basically doubling the cost of the phone and increasing the cost for the nations with stronger economies by adding “support” cost for others nations that don’t wanna take the steps to make their economies better.
 
At least once AAPL loses and can no longer act in its massively anticompetitive ways, it will probably go ahead and allow MacOS on the iPad as their App Store will no longer have its monopoly. If Apple can’t make a 30% cut anyways, may as well make the hardware and OS work together the way they could.

People don’t realize and they want to support AAPL, but it’s not a child nor a person to be idolized. It’s a company that only has a desire to embolden the shareholders and thereby the executive team.

Imagine a lot of companies that could all innovate with interoperability among tech products. Would be massively great for consumers. Europe is only the beginning.
interoperability
what exactly you mean ?
app developers have freedom to release apps in any app store they choose.
What's App works on Android and iPhone.
What next Apple should work with Microsoft so that people can install Windows on iPad ?
 
Much easier for Apple to pull out of India since they've just started to enter the market 🤣

India is a huge market. Even if they only have a small part of it, that’s still as large as the entire EU market. Definitely not easy for Apple to pull out of it.
 
Users have choice, buy Android phone and side load apps.
what next, i want to run windows on my iPad, Apple should work with Microsoft to make sure iPad can run Microsoft Windows on iPad ?

A PC can run Windows, Linux and MacOS (if you know how). It is not a bad idea to force Apple allow alternative OS on their iPad or Mac.

Apple doesn’t have to facility that, but Apple need to stop put artificial barriers on their platform.
 
Imagine if EU forced Apple to work with Linux community, Microsoft and Google to make sure that any of these operating systems should work on Apple hardware ?
we get best of both worlds, best processor, best OS to choose from.
and by the way Apple should still cover warranty no matter which OS people choose and make sure that battery life is not degraded.
Let's go EU :)
 
Yeah, imagine that, you have to abide by the rules of countries you operate in. Making the most money in the world doesn't actually entitle you to do anything you want wherever you want. What a crazy concept!
Yep, free market is crazy concept.
we want government to baby sit corporations, people, businesses.
More government intervention better,
bigger the government the better.
 
Android phones have much larger market share than iPhones, but some how Apple is monopoly ?

Look, regardless of market share there are basically only two companies controlling all the cellphones in the world: Apple and Google (since every phone that’s not an iphone uses Android regardless of who made it). There’s practically nothing else. How could that be good for the end users?
 
interoperability
what exactly you mean ?
app developers have freedom to release apps in any app store they choose.
What's App works on Android and iPhone.
What next Apple should work with Microsoft so that people can install Windows on iPad ?

No he means for Apple to open up some of its apps that have historically been apple-exclusive such as imessage or facetime.
 
if people think that side loading apps will reduce price then they are naive, consumers won't benefit from this.
businesses will benefit from this.
in google play store people can pay for subscription using Spotify account bypassing google play store.
so if customers pay using Spotify account bypass google play store, would it be cheaper for consumers ?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Good for India. Imagine if iPhones only worked with cases and other accessories from the Apple Store, that'd be ridiculous.

People complaining about government size or misguided focus - larger populations and markets require larger governments, just like a larger ship needs more crew. Moreover just like a ship's crew, a government is not monolithic and can address multiple issues at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Imagine if EU forced Apple to work with Linux community, Microsoft and Google to make sure that any of these operating systems should work on Apple hardware ?
we get best of both worlds, best processor, best OS to choose from.
and by the way Apple should still cover warranty no matter which OS people choose and make sure that battery life is not degraded.
Let's go EU :)

And Apple had already started on this with boot camp on the macs, but took a step back when they switched to the M processors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
And is it currently impossible for other companies to make phones? With an OS?

It certainly seems to be impossible. Except for Apple, practically every single other phone manufacturer in the world uses Google’s OS (Android). Nobody ever uses anything else anymore. Nobody creates their own OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.