Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s an interesting world we live in where consumer product features are increasingly being dictated by governments and regulators rather than consumer choice.

I wonder how long this phase will last before consumers demand freedom to make their own choices again?

It would be nice if regulators would do something about the android monopoly, the most anticompetitive thing about the smartphone market. We need regulations that allow other operating systems and ecosystems to emerge. Maybe after a smartphone OEM has reached a certain size they can no longer use Android and instead must create their own OS and ecosystem? That way a small startup can use a fairly ready-made OS and ecosystem but a large successful company must invest in their own OS and ecosystem to prevent the ongoing monopolisation of the market by Google.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Yet, I feel that is probably massively leaning to the fact that they are ether the most populated or 2nd most populated country in the world.

The biggest economies in the world (from a small search https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/the-top-10-economies-in-the-world)

USA dwarfs everyone, then China. With slot 3 and 4 both going to countries no where near the population level of India. The only main reason China is on that list as high as they are is because the western world pretty much turned them into their manufacturing (beep) for the last 30+ years.
The USA is 4% of the worlds population and about 18% of the worlds GDP (and falling.)
 
That's why my electricity is incredibly expensive and unreliable.

Oh, wait, it's the opposite. Without a profit motive, my electricity is actually cheap and very reliable.
Just like the health systems of 1st world countries even through they have Universal healthcare.
 
The trouble is there won’t be a so-called ‘walled garden’ for consumers to choose. Governments are taking that choice away from consumers.
What makes you fear this? The "opt in" to walked gardens would never be prevented. Obviously.
 
There’s no OS to replace iOS to allow people to pick a ‘walled garden’.
Why can't iOS have a toggle switch?? It could protect people that are afraid to use laptops and desktops.
 
Last edited:
Excellent news. The EU led the way, now the rest of the world will follow. Soon enough Apple apologists will have to encourage Apple to leave planet Earth and sell their iPhones on the Moon or on Mars. it’s also nice to see India seems to have taken an even stronger stance on the issue. Perhaps the EU will also tighten the regulations soon enough, that would also be good.

Hollywood exists because people wanted to get away from New York and copyright law enforcement.

Maybe space travel will finally kick off for similar reasons. At this rate, the most likely means of getting humans permanently off this planet will be a megacorporation funding the colony for the sole purpose of setting its own laws.

Between Musk, Bezos, and maybe soon Cook, it seems like they'd have more funding than NASA.
 
It’s an interesting world we live in where consumer product features are increasingly being dictated by governments and regulators rather than consumer choice.

Consumer product features are also subject to law. Corporations aren’t lawless or self-governing.

I wonder how long this phase will last before consumers demand freedom to make their own choices again?

It would be nice if regulators would do something about the android monopoly, the most anticompetitive thing about the smartphone market. We need regulations that allow other operating systems and ecosystems to emerge. Maybe after a smartphone OEM has reached a certain size they can no longer use Android and instead must create their own OS and ecosystem? That way a small startup can use a fairly ready-made OS and ecosystem but a large successful company must invest in their own OS and ecosystem to prevent the ongoing monopolisation of the market by Google.

There are only two mobile OS, one is iOS and one is Android. The big difference is there are many market participants using Android and adding their own flavours to Android.

Whereas iOS, there are only one, which is Apple.

It is pretty simple, make iOS more open, and possibles force Apple open source iOS, just like how Android is open source. Apple can add their own thing, such as iMessage etc.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: jhfenton
Consumer product features are also subject to law. Corporations aren’t lawless or self-governing.



There are only two mobile OS, one is iOS and one is Android. The big difference is there are many market participants using Android and adding their own flavours to Android.

Whereas iOS, there are only one, which is Apple.

It is pretty simple, make iOS more open, and possibles force Apple open source iOS, just like how Android is open source. Apple can add their own thing, such as iMessage etc.
Since consumers should have the choice of a closed source, ‘walled garden’ OS and ecosystem, the solution to the issue of the duopoly is to regulate more mobile OSes and ecosystems into existence.

Forcing iOS to be more like Android reduces choice for consumers, not increase it.

Having more than two OSes and ecosystems to choose from increases choice for consumers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.