It’s a powerhouse at returning inaccurate results. Bravo.
www.techspot.com
Well the snapdragon x elite gen 4 already smokes the A18 pro. Don’t know where you got your info from.
Examples from today? Apple is trailing behind in technology like OLED, older generations of Qualcomm modems in their iPhone pro’s, slow SSD (and way overpriced) and I can go on….
Cook’s first instinct was correct. AI does suck. It just spits out results that are oftentimes realistic enough to give people a false sense of security about their accuracy. “It’s well-formatted and grammatically correct. It seems confident, too. It must be right!”
Cook’s only instinct is 💰, he doesn’t care about the rest.
This is really short sighted. You are thinking they are two different products when the reality is they will be integrated into just one. If we had it your way then Apple would have realized a cellular phone, an iPod and a breakthrough internet communication device individually
That the best list you can come up with? Screen displays and modems?
Citation, cause it ain’t so. Of course if you throw away some of the benchmarks, maybe it’s true.
That's my point. They’re the only ones leading in the AI field, but I don't see them creating their own mobile OS and hardware that is integrated and has AI at its core. Is Apple not innovating as much as they were before? Yes. But no other brand is truly innovating at that level either. Right now, AI seems like a fad, and it's crazy that they dropped their Car development and AVP projects to focus on AI because of investors. I'm not saying they should be left behind. I don't want them to be a BlackBerry, but why jump into a market they've never been the best at (Siri)?
But many people have essentially the opposite experience, or somewhere significantly inbetween.
Disagree. Jobs would’ve hired top tier lawyers within the legal department at Apple to handle that stuff. I do think we’d have more well-polished software and more visually appealing hardware if he were still in charge - as well as more products in the main stream that we can’t even think of.I meant right now. Different people are needed in different parts of Apple’s timeline.
I have no intention of minimising Steve’s legacy, but if we want to go there, I am of the belief that Steve Jobs would have been a disaster were he still running Apple today, when you consider that Apple’s biggest challenges today are not other tech companies like Samsung or Google, but governments and legislation.
For his shortcomings, Tim Cook seems better at handling an Apple of its current size, and manoeuvring sensitive political landscapes. Perhaps that matters more right now than simply making a better iPhone.
I could totally see Steve instructing Apple to withdraw from the EU in response to the DMA, solely out of spite. Would that be what you all want? Mutually assured destruction?
Come to think of it thought. That might actually be fun to watch as a fly on the wall.
Don't count out parrots! Our family once had a talking bird -- I think it's called myna bird. Anyway, it learned to yell "coming!" when the doorbell rang. While we were away, many delivery people ended up standing by the door, wondering why nobody ever came to open it, when they could clearly hearing someone yelling "coming!'
You get money by making your customers happy. Apple is the richest company on Earth, ergo, people voted with their money and chose Apple. Deal with it.
