Nope, a government that want's the economy to be in the hands of many instead of one, it's always bad to bet on one horse.Yes and that is being the authoritarian government if u only accept business which suits u.
Nope, a government that want's the economy to be in the hands of many instead of one, it's always bad to bet on one horse.Yes and that is being the authoritarian government if u only accept business which suits u.
They knew it would get rejected — just like Epic when they knowingly violated the developer agreement. They are like children that do things they know are wrong, but crave attention so much that they do it anyway.Wasn’t this the case with Amazon? Why did Spotify think that the outcome would be any different for them?
Different model. You buy audiobooks outside of the AppStore, the audible app is just a player.How come Amazon doesn't have to pay a 30% cut for every sale through their app?
While true, they initially had to fight just for the option to support HomePod; same scenario here, it's a never-ending battle.Let me know when they implement native support for HomePod 💅🏻 💁🏻♂️ 🥱
While true, they initially had to fight just for the option to support HomePod; same scenario here, it's a never-ending battle.
Home - Time to Play Fair
www.timetoplayfair.com
Most emulators are open source like on F-Droid for AndroidYes and crack apps and get malware easily
Which allowed apps to share a single link. Back then, it was obvious what Apple had in mind when they agreed to said concession.
Spotify is clearly doing a lot more than that, in a bid to see what they can and cannot get away with.
We can argue about whether the rule is reasonable or not, but it’s pretty clear what Spotify is (and isn’t) allowed to do.
Ooooh an email, oh the horror.
It's basically the same thing. Apple also approved Spotifys implementation and then rejected it![]()
Should Apple Music have to add 30% to it’s price too?I never quite understood why Spotify doesn’t just add the 30% to their in-app prices on top of their “actual” subscription fees like every other app does?
Next to everyone I know is subscribed to some kind of service or app and we all know there’s nearly always one price when paying directly in the app and another, lower price if you jump over on the company’s own website and pay there.
The users unaware of this will pay the extra 30% that goes directly to Apple and the rest go to Spotify dot com and pay there sans Apple’s additional fees.
Spotify loses all its traction if appears more expensive over Apple Music when buying a subscription as an in-app purchase?
By now, nearly everyone who has dipped their toes into paid music steaming knows that Spotify is $9.99/month -surely most would look at a $12.99 and know it’s unusual and quickly check Spotify.com or ask google prices?
I believe the record companies negotiate those rates not the artists themselves.Not sure why any artist would be on Spotify with their crappy streaming payout rates, but that is just me.
As far as competition, Apple is not the only market out there. It is not even the dominant smart phone platform.
I have to agree I do not think Apple is going to be satisfied and stop until the DOJ or the US congress put an end to this uncompetitive nonsense by Apple.Apple, sweetie, you trying to give those antitrust legislators more ammo? 😅
And delete any competing Apple products because they probably suck.Tim, just buy Spotify and adopt its UI and discard the rest. Problem solved. Next.
Spotify has not taken Epic’s route since they did not circumvent the rules. I suspect Apple will be in legal trouble if they can not get the anti steering ruling thrown out since it bans the behavior Apple is currently engaging in.Spotify is purposefully taking Epic’s route, good luck with that !
I'm talking about Prime videoDifferent model. You buy audiobooks outside of the AppStore, the audible app is just a player.
If I get malware on my device because I downloaded something sketchy, that's my fault, my hardware. Look at macOS.Yes and crack apps and get malware easily
I am sure that is the same reason why Apple will not allow you to choose your voice assistant like Google does on Android since they know their services are inferior to their competitors.Apple sure is insecure, if they had confidence in their offerings being the best, why shut out competition?
Aren’t billionaire cat fights fun! It’s like watching two drunk people at closing time argue over who pays for the cab ride home. All those smells of beer and urine and vomit just make you think of home. 😜
Apple and Spotify are once again feuding as Spotify attempts to break into the audiobook market, reports The New York Times. Apple has reportedly rejected Spotify's latest app update three times in the last month.
![]()
Over the years, Apple and Spotify have had a long running dispute over Apple's App Store policies, with multiple public conflicts over app and subscription fees and app rejections due to Spotify's attempts to skirt the up to 30 percent cut that Apple takes from purchases.
Apple says that Spotify is again trying to get around its App Store rules, and the Cupertino company claims that Spotify's audiobooks update is not in line with guidelines that cover how apps can communicate with users about purchasing options outside of the App Store.
Apple last year agreed to an App Store rule change that allows developers to use communications like email to share information methods about payment options that are available outside of an iOS app, but Spotify is running into issues attempting to implement this feature. With the rule change, Spotify wanted to direct customers to buy books online to listen to in the app, rather than giving Apple a cut of its audiobook sales.
Apple apparently told Spotify that it can send customers emails about online purchases, but Spotify is not able to offer a button inside of the app to request emails. The feature was designed with Spotify's legal team involved, and Apple initially approved the update in September, but later reversed course, rejecting subsequent updates.
Spotify designed a nine-step process for purchasing an audiobook, which involved a customer tapping on an audiobook and seeing a screen with a lock over the play button. Pressing on the play button provided customers with a page where they could request information on how to buy a book through an email, and the email offered up a link to purchase the book.
According to The New York Times, an Apple spokesperson said that Apple does not have objections to audiobooks in the Spotify app, but Spotify cannot circumvent the rules around web addresses and language encouraging customers to make purchases outside of the app.
After the multiple rejections from Apple, Spotify released a version of the app that removes information about how to purchase an audiobook from the Spotify website, which Apple did approve. Spotify now informs users that there is no option to buy an audiobook in the app. "We know it's not ideal," says Spotify in the app text.
![]()
Spotify in 2019 filed a regulatory complaint with the European Union over Apple's App Store practices, and it maintains an anti-Apple "Time to Play Fair" website. Spotify has continued to meet with European regulators, but the case has not concluded as of yet. Spotify has also sided with Epic Games in the Epic Games v. Apple legal battle, and it participates in the "Coalition for App Fairness" alongside Epic Games, Tile, and others who are unhappy with Apple's "anti-competitive" policies.
Article Link: Apple Rejected Spotify's App Update Adding Audiobook Support
They are playing fair. Spotify is trying to take Apple customers without compensating them for attracting them in the first place. Maybe Apple should purchase all of Spotify’s ad inventory on their platforms to promote Apple Music and Apple’s Podcasts with half price deals for 3 years after 6 months free.Apple seems to be playing not entirely fair with spotify
It’s more like they know that Google and Amazon’s options are designed for data gathering first and foremost and that lovers of these companies have no clue. Including the tech heads that are constantly pushing them.I am sure that is the same reason why Apple will not allow you to choose your voice assistant like Google does on Android since they know their services are inferior to their competitors.
You are telling me that Apple losing all their Siri users to their competitors on iPhone is not factoring in their decision making at all. Not to mention Apple is starting to monitor user interactions with Siri to attempt to improve but it is a little too late and by the time Apple catches up Google/Amazon Alexa will be further ahead AI wise.It’s more like they know that Google and Amazon’s options are designed for data gathering first and foremost and that lovers of these companies have no clue. Including the tech heads that are constantly pushing them.