Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My internet connection reset right before the download was complete, now it says "An error has occurred" next to the "install" button on the mac app store purchases page. Only when I click that nothing happens. Suggestions?
 
You just need an admin account in OS X Server.

You can startup the HTTP service in Snow Leopard today, without root privileges.

In other news, Lion seems to have broken AD after the install. Sweet.

I'm probably missing something, but aren't you probably just going to have to uncheck a box to avoid installing Lion Server as part of the OS install process?
 
Do you worry about wether an app is "open" or "closed" in iOS? No. Apple wants the same for OS X.

yes i do, i close them all the time. according to my SB Settings the RAM goes down to about 100 mb with a few apps "open" or just left in the multitasking tray and when i close them it goes back up to 340ish mb. god i dont want the same annoying thing on my real OS
 
yes i do, i close them all the time. according to my SB Settings the RAM goes down to about 100 mb with a few apps "open" or just left in the multitasking tray and when i close them it goes back up to 340ish mb. god i dont want the same annoying thing on my real OS

Exactly what I was thinking! As I sometimes run a decent number of different apps, if they all were "open" when not using them my computer would probably explode! My 09 MBP can play Team Fortress 2 decently if I have most of the programs on my mac off, and wifi/bluetooth off with my fans at 6000rpm and it will also stay semi cool. But if all my apps just "stay" open then that would really hamper my successful gaming.
 
I'm just gonna leave this here (found it somewhere else):
migrationassistant.png

There's something pretty interesting in this pic. Let's see if you guys can notice it ;)
 
yes i do, i close them all the time. according to my SB Settings the RAM goes down to about 100 mb with a few apps "open" or just left in the multitasking tray and when i close them it goes back up to 340ish mb. god i dont want the same annoying thing on my real OS

You're jailbroken, so that invalidates your point.
 
I'm just gonna leave this here:
migrationassistant.png

There's something pretty interesting in this pic. Let's see if you guys can notice it ;)

The Windows Migration Assistant? If that's it, it makes sense since 50% of new Mac owners come from Windows.
 
Last edited:
I'm just gonna leave this here:
There's something pretty interesting in this pic. Let's see if you guys can notice it ;)

Migration Assistant (Windows)! Do I get a cookie??? Edit: beaten to it.

Exactly what I was thinking! As I sometimes run a decent number of different apps, if they all were "open" when not using them my computer would probably explode! My 09 MBP can play Team Fortress 2 decently if I have most of the programs on my mac off, and wifi/bluetooth off with my fans at 6000rpm and it will also stay semi cool. But if all my apps just "stay" open then that would really hamper my successful gaming.
They are "open" in the iOS sense, not the current OS X sense. If there aren't any tasks running, they'd be suspended and not using resources, (which is why apps have to be updated to support the feature; otherwise, you'd open and quit them as normal.)
 
Last edited:
Well, Gconf/dconf is an array of XML files, just like ~/Library/Preferences on your Mac is.

You say that as if XML is a good thing... The backend to store the "registry" in doesn't matter. The concept of a registry (central corruptible, deletable) in itself is flawed.

What I like GNOME for is that HIG enforcement is good more often than not.

For things included in Gnome. libgtk/libgnome apps are all over the place UI wise (not that QT/kdelibs apps are any better). The stuff included in the KDE main packages is pretty decent as far as interface goes.

In KDE 3.5.10, Kontact was the best thing since sliced bread to stay current, and Kate was the best thing since Emacs.

You're forgetting K3B (the best burning software. Period) and Amarok (iTunes can go cry in a corner).

You're jailbroken, so that invalidates your point.

Easy to ignore everyone else who isn't jailbroken and made plenty of perfectly viable points. His point is also fine, I see the same thing on my non-jailbroken iPhone. Except instead of SB settings, I either get 1 hour of battery or 30 hours.
 
yes i do, i close them all the time. according to my SB Settings the RAM goes down to about 100 mb with a few apps "open" or just left in the multitasking tray and when i close them it goes back up to 340ish mb. god i dont want the same annoying thing on my real OS

Hopefully your Mac has more than 512 MB of RAM so you won't have to worry about it.
 
They need to fix the "feature" backward scrolling. i.e. Scroll up to go down and down to go up - much like iOS. It works on touch screens like: iDevices and will work on the potential iMac touch. But, for mice and trackpads, it doesn't work, we're used to normal scrolling. i.e. scroll down to go down, and up to go up.
 
They need to fix the "feature" backward scrolling. i.e. Scroll up to go down and down to go up - much like iOS. It works on touch screens like: iDevices and will work on the potential iMac touch. But, for mice and trackpads, it doesn't work, we're used to normal scrolling. i.e. scroll down to go down, and up to go up.

You can disable it in System Preferences.
 
Repository functionality on the file system level with a good(!) AND friendly(!) user interface really is something that lots of people have been waiting for since... well, ever, actually. This could be really, really awesome.

As a software developer, Versions is the feature I'm most excited about. No more need for a private local Subversion.



Ooh, Sandboxing and Privilege Separation!!

Half of the exploits with stuff like Acrobat and Flash have to do with documents carrying rogue, executable code hidden inside. Safari is known for being exploitable, although there aren't any examples in the wild yet.

I'd love to be able to sandbox Acrobat Reader to only be able to read files, and not mess with my system. Same with Flash, etc. Hell, being able to make them only open files in my Documents, Desktop, and network shares would be a great step too.

Basically Versions is a fiddle with Time machine. How can people be excited about something so minor?

Time Machine only saves once an hour, which is nowhere near granular enough when you're actively working on a document. But more pertinently, when I got my notebook, I was trying to find ways to have Time Machine backup my workset documents locally, since I want to be able to work wherever, which precludes bringing a portable hard drive with me. This fills that hole very nicely. Especially if it's easy to configure what not to save. For example, I only want to version source files, but not the files that are built from them.

And they're right to do so! Come on folks, I know it's hard to admit it (especially for those of us working in IT) but the enterprise market is going to decline from here on out. Local servers and the cost of maintaining them are going to get less and less important with services moving to the cloud and support being outsourced.

Totally. I think that serious serving will move to the cloud, and that will necessitate local computers being more of a server than ever, as they become more of a hub for consumer devices, and then intermediate between those and the cloud. Putting a server OS in the desktop, and users now move move from the desktop to a hand held, makes sense. Think of how many people use a computer as a media server.
 
Do developer previews run in VM?

I'm so tempted to pay the $99, especially if it's true that the final copy is included in that price. I'm dying to test the new filevault. But, I have only 1 core2duo system and I can't afford to run an untested OS on it right now.
 
Easy to ignore everyone else who isn't jailbroken and made plenty of perfectly viable points. His point is also fine, I see the same thing on my non-jailbroken iPhone. Except instead of SB settings, I either get 1 hour of battery or 30 hours.

I believe I have addressed the other points as well. Did you miss my previous post? It can happen in this crazy thread!
 
Good grief, "tried it in the store?"

Yea because that's the same. My magic trackpad is the best input device I've ever had for any iMac by a long, long way. The mouse is pathetic by comparison.

Well I certainly disagree with this. I've purchased two trackpads and they both went back. I'd say the trackpad is "pathetic" in comparison to a good mouse. I would be willing to prove it by having a comparative analysis of who could move and edit windows/documents faster. I have ZERO doubt the mouse would win.
 
yes i do, i close them all the time. according to my SB Settings the RAM goes down to about 100 mb with a few apps "open" or just left in the multitasking tray and when i close them it goes back up to 340ish mb. god i dont want the same annoying thing on my real OS

iOS automatically closes least frequently used apps when memory pressure reaches a certain threshold. Actually, what it does is send several levels of memory warnings to the active foreground, and backgrounded but still running applications. Those apps are expected to use that opportunity to free what memory they can to ease memory pressure. If memory pressure remains high, the OS will begin jettisoning least frequently used applications that are suspended. What you are doing is completely unnecessary and rather pointless. The OS already does it for you.

It is a form of caching... and like most forms of caching, the memory used is automatically recoverable by the system as required without impact on performance. The memory in the system is of no benefit if it's not being used. Free memory is useless memory in terms of system performance.

EDIT: An important thing to glean from that. iOS does not support paging. There is no swap file. If memory an application requests can not be allocated, the application outright crashes. There is no swapping to disk. Are your apps constantly crashing because of this high memory usage you are complaining about? I will wager, no, they aren't. Why is that? It's because the system automatically recovers memory for running applications by closing suspended applications as needed.
 
Last edited:
Versions saves once an hour as well. Hopefully there will be ways to go around that limitation (like there is with TM.)

Whaaat?! That's pretty close to pointless. Hopefully it'll be configurable.


The combination of Auto Save and Versions really concerns me. There are many times when I’m making changes to a document, and after 5 minutes I’m like….no…this is not what I want. So I close the document without saving, reopen, and ta da, back to where I want to be. If I’m reading things right the document is auto saved in real time, but versioned every hour. What!

Well, as long as the versions that correspond to a user initiated save are distinguishable from the subsequent auto saves, then it should be really easy to revert. Hell, a lot of the time when the edit goes wrong, it's somewhere in the middle between the last save, and now, so versions and auto save should help you get back to the closest point where all was good.

The guys at Sofa must be happy to see Apple call their autosave system Versions.

What is it with OS makers and trampling on people that make your OS more usable in the first place?

Sounds like trademark infringement to me.
 
Well, as long as the versions that correspond to a user initiated save are distinguishable from the subsequent auto saves, then it should be really easy to revert. Hell, a lot of the time when the edit goes wrong, it's somewhere in the middle between the last save, and now, so versions and auto save should help you get back to the closest point where all was good.

You're right. I should have thought my concern through more thoroughly.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.