Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by Hozie
That top-of-the-line model seems out of whack. Who's going to shell out 2,300+$ for a consumer machine? Granted, it's got a gig of RAM and superdrive, bluetooth and aiport extreme, but you could get a low-end powermac + 17" LCD for the same price! Dunno, seems a tad expensive... even more so than usual.

Not if they're to be spec'd the same. The powermac would cost $100 more w/o a 17" monitor.
 
Eh.

I sort of think people are off the mark in wanting a 15" superdrive middle iMac model, because only a real entry-level consumer is going to want a tiny little 15" screen; such a consumer is not likely to make great use of a superdrive. iMovie/iDVD on a 15" screen? I guess it can be done, but it cannot be fun!

HOWEVER, I do agree that there should be at least an option to have a 17" combo drive model. I think there are people who want the screen real estate, want more video ram, want the airport extreme etc, but dont have much use for a Superdrive. Namely, anyone who doesn't have a DV cam (which covers a hell of a lot of people).

I think the prices are fair. I just don't know why anyone would want a 15" iMac. This is 2003, baby, 15" screens on a desktop machine? No :) Of course, I just caved and bought a 23" Display. And of course, I also think that the iBook and 12" powerbook are completely unusable... I actually played with a 12" Powerbook in a store and was shocked at how iddy bitty it is. I mean it is way cool, but man I couldn't use that for anything. Bless my 15" TiG4 :)
 
Originally posted by CrackedButter


I think somehow normal people or possible switchers won't be turned on by these improvements.

Since LCD's have come down in price we could of seen better pricing at least, i was expecting a higher drop in price.

You don't kow what you're talking about. Both machines recieved upgrades and price drops around 200$. I don't like to critisize people, but $200 dolars is a pretty good savings when you are getting more stuff.
 
WWWWOOOOHHHHHHHOOOO!!!!!!
I just purchased a 17" with bluetooth and applecare! My first PERSONAL mac in 8 years. Now I just have to convince my wife its a good Valentine's Day gift for her (hey, better than a vacuum cleaner, right?)

cheers!
John
 
eMac question

Apples specs list the refresh rate at the highest resolution at 72 Hz on the eMac. Weren't the refresh rate 60 Hz before??? Has Apple updated the screen and the screen specs?
 
Originally posted by Room40
I knew it. I ****ing knew it.

It was just to good to be true. The run lasted from last novembers rollout of new Powerbooks and iBooks, to last weeks upgraded Power Macs and displays. That was a whopping span of three months of tentative good vibrations coming out of Cupertino. Today Apple opted for a head on collision with a brick wall and the result was anything but good.

What is this? One year after the introduction of the FP iMac all they can muster is a relative minor upgrade of the specs. Yes, I know, the captious minded will surely find something, but in the big picture this amounts to no more than; same ****, same wrapping, more expensive and thus losing its appeal faster than you can spell "No Switch".

Memo to Steve: You had the chance, but blew it. BIG TIME.
You are so wrong my freind,the new high end imac simply blows away the older and its cheaper faster more powerful and more expandable. I guess you were wanting steve to just give it to you!:eek:
 
don't forget...

Originally posted by dricci
It looks like the 800MHz iMac model is just the old iMac, same old 802.11b AirPort and requires the USB adapter for Bluetooth (and only has a 100MHz bus). The 17 inch supports AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth Internally, and has an Audio-In port (finally!).

Major lameness on the pricing and specs, Steve :eek: :mad:

Hey! remember... this is the year of the *laptop*... ;)

Dharvabinky
 
Well, now I don't even know if I want to switch. All the update did was make it more expensive for a college student....
 
Originally posted by CrackedButter


I think somehow normal people or possible switchers won't be turned on by these improvements.

Since LCD's have come down in price we could of seen better pricing at least, i was expecting a higher drop in price.

Most switchers care alot more about hardware specs than Mac people. At least the ones I know do anyway...

Most potential switchers get turned off by the slow bus speeds, bad memory performance and limited config choices.

However, OS X is a HUGE turn-on. More for the BSD-ish underpinnings than the look of it.

If there were more games available... it would be a different market indeed.

*sigh*
 
Re: Not good.

Originally posted by yosoyjay
The high end model is okay, but really for that price there should be more features. At a minimum 512MB RAM.
Sorry but the high end DOES has 1GB.
Originally posted by yosoyjay
Also, the upgrade to 7200 harddrives in any computer results in little or no gain in system responsivity. This is even more true in Macs running OS X with no L3 cache and only 256MB RAM.
BOLLOCKS!!!
What are you talking about? It makes a difference. Especially if you have low RAM, because your system uses the hard drive to page memory.
I think you are confusing the difference between a 7200rpm on ATA-100 and a 7200rpm on an ATA-133 (which is inexistant) and our problem.

I'm not here to bash you but what you just said doesn't feel right at all...

NicoMan
 
Originally posted by yzedf


Most switchers care alot more about hardware specs than Mac people. At least the ones I know do anyway...

Most potential switchers get turned off by the slow bus speeds, bad memory performance and limited config choices.

However, OS X is a HUGE turn-on. More for the BSD-ish underpinnings than the look of it.

If there were more games available... it would be a different market indeed.

*sigh*
Games are coming to the mac in droves!see inside mac gaming.The new high end imac can smoke with any game on the market for the mac as of right now! Doom3 well that may be another story but even all the pc stuff is going to struggle with that game!Again the new high end imac is very very solid!
 
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
You are so wrong my freind,the new high end imac simply blows away the older and its cheaper faster more powerful and more expandable. I guess you were wanting steve to just give it to you!:eek:

No, but it would be nice if Steve gave me a reason to by one.

The high end is OK I guess, but try explain that to my wallet...
 
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
Games are coming to the mac in droves!see inside mac gaming.The new high end imac can smoke with any game on the market for the mac as of right now! Doom3 well that may be another story but even all the pc stuff is going to struggle with that game!Again the new high end imac is very very solid!

DOOM3 - truth

But that just means a upgrade of the video card. No big deal. Can't do that with the iMac :(

I think that is why my g/f sold her iMac to get the iBook. Similar performance, but she can take it to school with her.

New high end iMac is better than I thought it would be. Makes the low end PowerMac seem... neutered ;)
 
Re: No Firewire Upgrade??

Originally posted by bbowdon
Is it me?

Where's the firewire upgrade??
'

What do you need it for? If you want future expandability then you want a PowerMac, not an all-in-one. That's why getting to 1GHZ and putting more value in the iMac was important. You're stuck with what you buy.
 
Disappointment?

It seems the mood is one of disappointment with the iMac updates. Since I haven't yet taken the plunge in to the Apple world, I'm not sure what I should have expected.

The updates seem to be pretty much in line with the most recent rumors. The one thing I still find baffling though is in the high end iMac Apple doesn't max out the memory in the first slot. That just seems dumb to me.

Speaking of that, I want to pretty much max out the RAM. Would you suggest I pay the people at the Apple store to switch the 256 MB chip for a 512 and buy a 512 from a third party? Or, maybe I should just leave the 256 in there and buy a 512 from a third party?

Given the price sensitivity in the market right now and the limitation on the G4 clock speed, I think this is about all Apple could have done for now. FW-800. Does a consumer really need this? What's going to drive those kinds of speeds? Gigabit Ethernet to surf the web? Don't think so.

This seems like a reasonable update. The way I figure it, I'm getting a 25% faster CPU, a 33% faster bus, double the graphics RAM for 10% less than I would have paid if I had bought a month ago.

Peace,
Brian
 
What you are seeing in these updates is the last of the 15 inch iMacs. That's why there isn't much of an upgrade, they are going to sell them all off. oemone posted about having a 15 inch screen on a desktop being silly. While I like the little iBook and powerbook, I kind of agree for desktop machines. These things are supposed to be work horses, and small screen estate doesn't give into that image.

My guess is that these are the last of the 5 inch releases. Once the 17 goes to 1.25, there will be no 15. Mark my words.
 
When can I get one?

Just called my local Apple store and the guy was clueless as to when they'd have the new iMacs in. I didn't see an availability date on the Apple website. Does anyone know when these are expected to be in the stores?

Thanks,
Brian
 
for yzedf- you are right about the base powermac but if there are people looking to upgrade i guess that would be the ticket but who the heck wants to buy a brand new machine and then be thinking of upgrades? If i get a new unit i dont want to upgrade at all for at least a year plus. sure its nice down the road but down the road there is allways newer better faster.Boils down to 1 word "MOTOROLA" Apple is just doing what it can because of this company and really when you think of it it is amazing where apple has gone considering the hand they are playing with.1 more comment it takes more then just videocard to do the hard core 3d gaming you still have to feed that card to get those frame rates. you could say have ati9700 pro on a 733 PM and you aint going to have anything but a slideshow with doom 3. Now put the 9700 with a 1.25pm and it is going to look pretty good my guess is.
 
Originally posted by possible switch
Well, now I don't even know if I want to switch. All the update did was make it more expensive for a college student....

I am confused as to how this makes it more expensive? $200 price-drops across the board, and you're complaining? Sheesh. Get a combo drive eMac from the Edu Store--$949.00. That's a good deal!

Regards,
Gus
 
Re: When can I get one?

Originally posted by brian0526
Just called my local Apple store and the guy was clueless as to when they'd have the new iMacs in. I didn't see an availability date on the Apple website. Does anyone know when these are expected to be in the stores?

Thanks,
Brian

uk store at least says shipping now, dunno about usa
 
Poor graphics

I'm amazed that Apple is still shipping crappy GeForce 2MX and 4MX cards in the iMacs. Surely at the price they charge they could put in at least a low end GeForce 4 Titanium or a Radeon 9000 Pro.
 
(Very) Potential Switcher

Originally posted by yzedf


Most switchers care alot more about hardware specs than Mac people. At least the ones I know do anyway...

Most potential switchers get turned off by the slow bus speeds, bad memory performance and limited config choices.

However, OS X is a HUGE turn-on. More for the BSD-ish underpinnings than the look of it.

If there were more games available... it would be a different market indeed.

*sigh*

You have it almost bang on. Although I don't care so much about hardware specs so much as reliability. I will be an "adder" as one news article put it. (Apparently, a good portion of the "switchers" are people buying a Mac to add to their computer arsenal as opposed to complete switchers.)

I use my PC for surfing the Net, listening to tunes, and organizing my digital photos. Windows is just wayyy to unreliable to have my music library and photos of my 14-month old kid. (Gotta learn to back things up more, I guess.) I also have a DV camcorder. In short, I want Apple's Digital Hub. (BTW, bought a 15" iMac for the folks last summer and thought it was great.)

However, with an iMac I don't think I can play online games with PC friends. (Virtual PC? I dunno.) I would continue to do that with my PC and use it as a "quarantine station" for any Net downloads.

Now I just have to decide WHICH digital hub I want.

Squire
 
Re: Disappointment?

Originally posted by brian0526
It seems the mood is one of disappointment with the iMac updates. Since I haven't yet taken the plunge in to the Apple world, I'm not sure what I should have expected.

The updates seem to be pretty much in line with the most recent rumors. The one thing I still find baffling though is in the high end iMac Apple doesn't max out the memory in the first slot. That just seems dumb to me.

Speaking of that, I want to pretty much max out the RAM. Would you suggest I pay the people at the Apple store to switch the 256 MB chip for a 512 and buy a 512 from a third party? Or, maybe I should just leave the 256 in there and buy a 512 from a third party?

Given the price sensitivity in the market right now and the limitation on the G4 clock speed, I think this is about all Apple could have done for now. FW-800. Does a consumer really need this? What's going to drive those kinds of speeds? Gigabit Ethernet to surf the web? Don't think so.

This seems like a reasonable update. The way I figure it, I'm getting a 25% faster CPU, a 33% faster bus, double the graphics RAM for 10% less than I would have paid if I had bought a month ago.

Peace,
Brian
I would suggest a 512 factory install that way you can still put another 512 later,firewire 800 who needs it? firewire right now jams and i dont think it is yet getting saturated.Again this imac is solid!
 
Re: 15" iMac

Originally posted by PretendPCuser
Ah well, what monitor issues did the eMac have? I was going to recommend it at work for a very basic machine until i read that there were some issues by a previous poster. Any info would be appreciated.

There are indeed problems with the displays of some eMacs. After some time with some eMacs the screen will start to get waves in it, or it may flicker, or it may skew the color horribly, or if you're really unlucky you will turn your computer on one day and hear a loud pop and have no more video.

Information from AppleCare verifies that all of these issues are related to Apple Care Document #95169. And despite what any veteran user or AppleStore Technician tells you, it is not normal degradation of a CRT or because you have your eMac too close to some magnetic object or the result of bad color settings.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.