Seems like discussion about it all is happening there.Doesnt work for me. I tried that b fore I posted.
Seems like discussion about it all is happening there.Doesnt work for me. I tried that b fore I posted.
Everyone check autofocus on the camera and see if it’s working. Seems to effect random phones, I have an 8 and it messed up my autofocus. Doesn’t work now for far objects.
Isn't that Craig Federighi's domain, being Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering?
Might be I don't know. I do know that if quality is not important to the CEO, its not important to anyone else. Whoever is in charge of software is being tasked with a certain set of priorities from the CEO, today we know those priorities are "ship it" regardless of the problems. Cook either does not understand, does not listen, or does not care.
They must have thought more people would prefer it to be temporary. This is an example of it being good to be vocal and complain... so that we can try to persuade then to change back. Personally, I don't understand why they didn't just put a toggle option in the settings so that users could pick which behavior they prefer. We should have far more settings options than we do.
Apple Pay cash is active people!! I was able to configure it right now!
Someone send me $100 so I can test out Apple Pay
[doublepost=1512450406][/doublepost]or if you didn't see this in time and went and traded in your 6 because you thought it was failing....when you could have updated the 11.2...who knew?This is priceless.
Right at the time IOS devices start crashing.
pacific time.
![]()
I agree. Any company can fail can for any reason. Samsung, eg, can go down in flames, so to speak. “Long time” Apple customers and steve jobs disciples may not like the new Apple. Nothing wrong with that, find what works and move on. Why I now have Apple products in my House is due to the deep software integration and just works philosophy. Yes, their ecosystem makes my life easier than android/windows. That’s why I like Apple.
If memory serves me right, iOS 5 and earlier brought comparatively fewer new features compared to iOS 7 and later. I suppose that when you are doing less, you make fewer mistakes, and there are fewer bugs to show for it. Perhaps this sufficed back when smartphones were still so new and android had their fair share of problems to cancel out their sheer versatility, but in hindsight, the breakneck pace at which Apple is introducing newer features in iOS now just goes to show how far behind they were in many areas prior to ios 7 as well.
I mean, can you imagine getting share sheet extensions only in iOS 8?
I don’t think Apple can go back to the old days of gradually releasing software features. Smartphone competition is intense and that rubicon has been crossed. And if the price is the odd bug here and there, I will take it.
Might be I don't know. I do know that if quality is not important to the CEO, its not important to anyone else. Whoever is in charge of software is being tasked with a certain set of priorities from the CEO, today we know those priorities are "ship it" regardless of the problems. Cook either does not understand, does not listen, or does not care.
Quite a subjective post. I don't know about you, but I don't care what apple did for "you" yesterday. I care what apple can do for me today. Whether or not you believe Tim Cook is the right CEO, he was handpicked by Jobs, apple has grown under his leadership. Seems like customers like the products and the board will probably keep him around until he can no longer do his job effectively. Whether or not apple fails in the future remains to be seen. The aphorism, "what goes up must come down" seems to apply in life and not specifically to apple, which was my prior commentary.Ignorance is bliss refers to newer Apple users who never experienced what Apple used to represent. Tim Cook is just like Scully. I know i lived through it and saw it first hand. Has Apple released any products like when Steve was running the company? Or even close. If it wasn’t for Steve you would’t be enjoying your Apple products you love some much. How do you think they got that way? Tim Cook? Sorry to tell you the Mac OS used to be better as was iOS. Steve was one of the greatest inventors of the century. Tim Cook is a numbers guy trying to steer a ship he did not build.
Jony Ive is Apples only saving grace right now. He should be running the company, not tim.
I like Apple too. I have had just about computer and phone and tablet they ever made. I currently own a X, a ipad pro, and a apple watch. I gave up my macs because sadly Microsoft products allows my company to be more productive and they in my opinion are just better products. And this is from a person who used to hate Microsoft. I wouldn’t dream of having anything from them. Well i do and i love them. The Surface studio is what a imac should be. Same goes for their surfacebooks. The surface pro not so much.
Tim Cook doesn’t have the keen eye for where technology is going. Nor does he have a feel of what consumers really want. Jony Ive does. He has a similar outlook of where technology is headed like steve and you can see that in the iphone X.
At this point Apple will not fall like in the past but i can see a day where there innovation is gone, there market share decreases and their mindshare decreases. And more importantly the product quality decreases. You are starting to see that now. They will be just another Samsung, LG, etc. There will be nothing special to differentiate them from any other company. Same thing happened in before the first time Steve left. You need a visionary to run Apple. Tim Cook is not that man.
I see you are a new Apple convert, good for you. But some of us have been Apple customers for decades and have a sort of partnership so to speak and generally have a mental investment in the company. Those that are new such as yourself if that is indeed the case will never understand. So forgive some of us if we give a damn. It’s not a Steve Job disiples thing. Its a quality thing. New customers have never experienced the kind of quality Apple used to put out and the innovation that was almost a right of passage for them. Sadly they will most likely never see it again.
[doublepost=1512452546][/doublepost]
Its in the execution of how you implement software features, makes no difference if its more of less. Has to do with less demanding standards.
[doublepost=1512452693][/doublepost]
Ding ding ding. We have a winner folks.
Different people are needed at different points in a company history. Jobs was right for his era, but he would have been a disaster for the Cook era. Cook is amazing, and has been responsible for most of the achievements of Apple, but not the initial innovation and concept that Jobs provided. Cook has refined the culture and expanded it, and in my opinion a great job as CEO of Apple.Ignorance is bliss refers to newer Apple users who never experienced what Apple used to represent. Tim Cook is just like Scully. I know i lived through it and saw it first hand. Has Apple released any products like when Steve was running the company? Or even close. If it wasn’t for Steve you would’t be enjoying your Apple products you love some much. How do you think they got that way? Tim Cook? Sorry to tell you the Mac OS used to be better as was iOS. Steve was one of the greatest inventors of the century. Tim Cook is a numbers guy trying to steer a ship he did not build.
Being able to design good products does not equate having the business acumen to manage a huge company.Jony Ive is Apples only saving grace right now. He should be running the company, not tim.
And they have sold in extremely pathetic quantities. Not surprising why Apple is going down that route. There just isn't much demand for them. Maybe it might have made sense back when Apple was a much smaller company catering to a more niche crowd, but certainly not for the Apple of today who caters to the mass market.I like Apple too. I have had just about computer and phone and tablet they ever made. I currently own a X, a ipad pro, and a apple watch. I gave up my macs because sadly Microsoft products allows my company to be more productive and they in my opinion are just better products. And this is from a person who used to hate Microsoft. I wouldn’t dream of having anything from them. Well i do and i love them. The Surface studio is what a imac should be. Same goes for their surfacebooks. The surface pro not so much.
You are likely right in that Tim Cook does not oversee Apple's product strategy. Tim Cook is largely responsible for looking after Apple's day-to-day operations. Product strategy most likely falls to Apple designers, who include Jony Ive, Richard Howarth, and Apple's industrial design team.Tim Cook doesn’t have the keen eye for where technology is going. Nor does he have a feel of what consumers really want. Jony Ive does. He has a similar outlook of where technology is headed like steve and you can see that in the iphone X.
I think there is a tendency for people to give companies still being run by the original founders the benefit of a doubt, while Apple has a much higher bar to jump over, because their every move is being compared to an idealised projection of what Steve Jobs might have done in a similar situation. Never mind that we have no way of predicting the future, and people are assuming that Steve Jobs would somehow have magically gotten everything right from the get go (he didn't; Apple also had its fair share of missteps under his tenure).At this point Apple will not fall like in the past but i can see a day where there innovation is gone, there market share decreases and their mindshare decreases. And more importantly the product quality decreases. You are starting to see that now. They will be just another Samsung, LG, etc. There will be nothing special to differentiate them from any other company. Same thing happened in before the first time Steve left. You need a visionary to run Apple. Tim Cook is not that man.
I see you are a new Apple convert, good for you. But some of us have been Apple customers for decades and have a sort of partnership so to speak and generally have a mental investment in the company. Those that are new such as yourself if that is indeed the case will never understand. So forgive some of us if we give a damn. It’s not a Steve Job disiples thing. Its a quality thing. New customers have never experienced the kind of quality Apple used to put out and the innovation that was almost a right of passage for them. Sadly they will most likely never see it again.
Is anyone else getting that metallic haptic click on an iPhone X? I'm curious if it's a common thing. I haven't upgraded yet and don't want to if it it could damage the haptic engine.
Never seen an iOS with this many small bugs. Nothing really works.
About 15% of all buttons aren't performing their intrinsic actions.
The "Phoning" Experience has become quite awkward and the iPhone is a phone but it is not really good at it.
Voicemails are coming days later and re appearing after being deleted.
This iOS has taken control over its creators and not the other way around![]()
"Whoever is in charge of software is being tasked with a certain set of priorities from the CEO, today we know those priorities are "ship it" regardless of the problems."
We know? Really? Speaking for everyone now? That is just your assertion and guess.
"Might be I don't know."
That's much better. You don't know...
It would certainly be the case for the Senior Vice President of Software Engineering, whose responsibility that directly falls under.
Here's an idea I haven't seen anyone use. What if people just stopped upgrading until the last version of a particular major iOS release? That way, you still get to upgrade, but every time you do, it's solid and stable. Seems logical to me.
We do know the decision about when to ship software products comes from marketing or the CEO, not the Senior Vice President of Software Engineering. That is how Apple operates and I don't think any sane person would dispute it.
Simply not true.
Then maybe you can provide some other insight regarding why Apple is all over the place with software features and quality, other than "that's just the way software is developed." I've developed software all my life and I know differently.
Totally correct.Here's an idea I haven't seen anyone use. What if people just stopped upgrading until the last version of a particular major iOS release? That way, you still get to upgrade, but every time you do, it's solid and stable. Seems logical to me.