Don't you have wireless at home and use your internet connection instead of your mobile connection?
Nope. Ethernet is faster, more secure and more reliable imo.
No ethernet port on iPhone I'm aware of so off mobile data it goes.
Don't you have wireless at home and use your internet connection instead of your mobile connection?
Yes, but that doesn't mean they force you or even entice you to switch to using iCloud. There is no advantage to using iCloud, on a slow network, switching to iCloud will make things even slower.
That doesn't change the fact that the only reason for app download size limits is the same as for limits with tethering: Allowing the carriers to offer 'unlimited' data plans at 'reasonable' cost by limiting the biggest uses of data, tethering and app downloads. Some carriers have their own carrier-side of such special restrictions, eg, with video streaming.As @JackieInCo said above Android doesn't have it.
Well, most people don't have a workflow in regard to downloading apps, it just happens automatically. And if you don't have multiple accounts, hitting the download button (either per app or a download all) in iTunes or in the App Store app on iOS, is a workflow change that has very little effects. It's about the same work and effort in both situations.Well of course they are forcing us to download apps only via device now and stop using the Mac as an App archive. That is the whole point of the release and removing the App Store from iTunes. It's changing the workflow.
Nope. Ethernet is faster, more secure and more reliable imo.
No ethernet port on iPhone I'm aware of so off mobile data it goes.
It is a shame you have slow internet. We need better internet in our country. And people wonder why 4K streaming and 4K Apple TV is slow to roll out. And it is not much better if you had 100/200/300 Mbps plans.
I have Spectrum internet. Even with 300mbps speeds (sorry plan), I have issues streaming 4K because I rarely hit the speeds they advertise. They always like to mask the issue saying "It is only up to 300". Okay, but when I only get 10mbps download, don't you think that is an issue?!
They get it fixed, then a month or two goes by and the same thing happens. Having the 300mbps plan, I only get on average 100mbps if I am lucky. Every month or two they seem to have "issues on their side" that makes me only get 10mbps.
Nope. Ethernet is faster, more secure and more reliable imo.
No ethernet port on iPhone I'm aware of so off mobile data it goes.
So, if you want to download an app to both your iPhone and iPad, you've now got to download it twice? Hopefully, as noted above, iTunes still keeps copies locally.
What of switching stores? The iOS 11 App Store doesn't offer any means to switch accounts, seemingly locking it to the account specified in the system preferences. Presumably that's now (for now?) got to be accomplished in the iTunes Store.
I assume you still see the Apps tab on your device, when it's attached. I wonder if they improved the app manager/arranger aspect, which has always been clunky at best, but still 100x better than trying to organize a hundred apps on the device itself.
MacRumors readers aren't a homogeneous group of people and I've always highlighted that I like iTunes' power and swiss army knife approach.We've spent the last 10 years complaining about how much we DON'T want to use iTunes to manage anything, and now that we don't need to people are complaining that we can't lol.
(Not saying the questions/concerns aren't valid, it's just funny.)
Good points - I DO NOT want to have to download an app 10-20x a year between all my and my wife's and kids iPhones and iPads, now that Comcast is charging for overages. As it is, my wife and kids and I can easily use over 700GB of our 1TB bandwidth from streaming.
Sometimes I have to visit my mother-in-law in another town and sync her iPad mini 3G to my MacBook to update movies and apps, and back it up, since she doesn't have wifi. How are we supposed to accomplish that now? This sucks!
And we have our iMac authorized for mutlple iTunes accounts, and everyone else syncs to that one with an 8TB drive to store our whole library - and now how do we install apps that we've bought with one of the other iTunes accounts? THIS IS A BIG DEAL FOR MANY PEOPLE. Before we could transfer apps (and media) from one iPhone with a different iTunes account to the iMac, and then sync that app over to our other phone and use the app on both.
And there's the issue of sometimes we have to save the old version of an app that supports older hardware, like the June 2017 version of Sony SongPal app works with the Sony STR-DN1050 receiver, but the new version Sony Music Player doesn't support this 2-3 year old receiver - those 1050 owners are left out in the cold if they let their phone update all apps. And the old version of the SongPal app would let me control music on another renderer other than my Sony (like my Perfectwave DAC with Ethernet bridge) and now the new app doesn't.
I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS MOVE AT ALL
[doublepost=1505339984][/doublepost]
I sure hope so, because I have to manage a couple hundred apps and I use the bigger iTunes screen for that.
It is not a fact but a conspiracy theory. It's clear the limit is set by Apple, not carriers or their wishes, or Android would have it too. Also the world is big and carriers are different. I have an unlimited data plan, I can stream movies in Full HD and they eat more bandwidth than any app updates. I can do everything, the only thing I can't do is to update/install an app over 100 Mb. That's just stupid.That doesn't change the fact that the only reason for app download size limits is the same as for limits with tethering: Allowing the carriers to offer 'unlimited' data plans at 'reasonable' cost by limiting the biggest uses of data, tethering and app downloads. Some carriers have their own carrier-side of such special restrictions, eg, with video streaming.
If you want to delete a custom ringtone, in phone summary tick "Manually manage music and videos" then go to the ringtones section and simply delete the ones you don't want.
I don't get this thread.
To add ringtones and old apps, just find the files and drag them to the phone in iTunes.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201593
If you want to delete a custom ringtone, in phone summary tick "Manually manage music and videos" then go to the ringtones section and simply delete the ones you don't want.
The functions to sync and backup phones are still there.
I do. The main thing I use iTunes for is to manage the hundreds of apps that I have. I will have to put off updating everything now and hope apple corrects this bad decision. A separate application would be nice but that won't be done in a month.Great decision Apple. Who downloads iOS apps on their Mac anyway?
Anything that removes bloat from iTunes is good for me.
Maybe you have no music.It now only says "manually manage videos" and the word "music" is no longer included.
Such an app already exists, how do you think institutional deployments of iOS devices work?
I think this is a clear example of how megalomaniac Apple is. Once again we see how control-freak these companies have become, and as the guy from TorrentFreak said to me when I talked about ProTube, "Apple likes to have a lot of control over what their users can access and what not, I'm afraid this will only increase in the future".
This has nothing to do with the fact that we paid for a content (although in my opinion it makes pointless any future purchase, since we can't make a backup of anything if not sanctioned by Apple, and I wouldn't trust my data with them). Also it's not about having to use the internet to do a few tasks. Or even what Apple wants to be available in their App-Store (that's their problem).
This is about CONTROLLING OUR LIVES. Every aspect of it. While we are complaining about a few issues of these apps and devices, they are devising new ways to enslave us. I am not concocting conspiracy theories and haven't gone mad (or creative): this last move is only another in a series of actions that prove to me they want to remove our freedom, they want to restrict what we do with things we own!
Make no mistake, this is the ultimate goal. And it will indeed be much worse if no one complains and fight against it.
Think about it: before this update no one (at least no experienced user) could quickly plug a device such as the iPAD to a PC and backup any app. Or anything, at least without using iTunes.
These devices are meant to be used the way Apple wants.
When restoring the iCloud backup (from the system) you needed internet access to re-download the free/paid apps you had (let's assume you lost your previous device). Meaning that if for any reason the app was removed from App-Store you couldn't have it again.
Before this iTunes update you could restore any app version provided it still worked. Not even the internet was required, you could just drag and drop the .IPA file, using iTunes. Of course this .IPA could only be downloaded (at the time you did this) IF THE APP WAS AVAILABLE in the APPLE-STORE. The thing is, I downloaded ProTube (last version) months ago.
Google had the app (and it was the 1st time I ever paid for an app from the App-Store after years using the iPAD) removed. Now I can't use it in a new device unless I drag and drop with an old iTunes version.
What prevents Apple from tomorrow modifying these devices from being totally offline? Can someone point me to any game or device that forces the owner to use the internet, otherwise it can't work or it's severely restricted? If you can name at least a few, then you are seeing where I am going...
What about removing apps or other contents remotely, like Amazon did with some Kindle ebooks?
Again: it's totally pointless to pay for things we can't really own. When I say OWN I am talking about a backup that can be used tomorrow or 10 years from now.
An update that does something so despicable, so evil like this only confirms my views that no one should support Apple and break free from their dirty tactics as much as possible.
Well put, Chupa Chupa. I started with Apple in 2010 and thus have no deep understanding of Steve Job's approach to implementing significant changes to what can be called "legacy" software. I wonder if he would have sanctioned the "covert", "passive aggressive", and I would add "sloppy" way of dropping this new iTunes on the update table. Apple is a business and can control its software however it wants but STYLE COUNTS.<rant>
The way Apple has covertly gone about this change is really slimy given how long iTunes has been the heart of everything media for everything Apple and how many millions of people DO still use iTunes to curate their apps and manage devices. Apple could have given users a heads up rather than craming the upgrade down user's throats before they were prepared. Clearly they were too busy leaking info about the new ATV 4K. Fortunately I'm a bit lazy about updating so I read about the change before I had a chance.
Even in the wake of this rug pulled from under us, Apple doesn't even bother to post any kind of support note that I can easily find on whether or not or how to sync devices with a Mac (or Windows for that matter since we are talking about iTunes). The only "sync" support note I see is one dated from last July and pictures the previous version of iTunes.
So at least on the face of it it seems this is Apple's passive aggressive way of telling people:
1. We are depreciating Macs usefulness as a hub
2. Go buy a damn iCloud subscription
3. Stop loading your devices with content you didn't buy from us
Is the "walled garden" is being converted into a prison where we'll all be wearing Apple striped garb soon? I love my Apple products but iTunes has been the nerve center for media content for over a decade. And while we are all focused on Apple's shiny new toys it sends its gendarmes in to clear out out stuff from our house and when we return told to leave with no help from Apple on where to go from here. Zero on the style scale. If Apple wants to slim down iTunes fine but even when Aperture and Photos were going the way of the dodo bird Apple gave us ample time to prepare. To paraphrase Schiller: great customer service my ass.
</rant>
I would consider myself to be in both sets then, as I want a balance of useful features and as little bloat as possible.It's just possible that those are two different sets of people.![]()