Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
baleensavage said:
Totally, while Dashboard and Spotlight are really nice, Tiger was so underwhelming. Hopefully 10.5 will be complete when it is released. Also the gui in Tiger between Apple apps does not match. They updated Mail and now iTunes, but why not Safari and the Finder Windows. I've never liked the brushed metal anyway.
The worst part is - Mail and iTunes don't even match, they just look similar!
 
qtip919 said:
GET IT STRAIGHT APPLE...PICK A FREAKING COMMON UI LOOK AND GO WITH IT!!!!!

sheesh

I mean, does anyone besides me look over at the scroll bar with the residual aqua UI and think...something here just doesnt belong

You're not alone, but I think we are in the minority. :(
 
hob said:
The worst part is - Mail and iTunes don't even match, they just look similar!

LOL. it looks like they took Mail.app and the iTunes.app and merged the UI to come with iTunes v 5.0 UI.

Looks like a cheap hack job. I cannot believe that I am saying this, but I can do a better job for the iTunes UI. :)

And I will be glad to give the design to Apple for FREE. ;) :) <-- Just Ask.
 
maya said:
LOL. it looks like they took Mail.app and the iTunes.app and merged the UI to come with iTunes v 5.0 UI.

Looks like a cheap hack job. I cannot believe that I am saying this, but I can do a better job for the iTunes UI. :)

And I will be glad to give the design to Apple for FREE. ;) :) <-- Just Ask.

It's the first time I've actually wanted to dig out a copy of ResEdit and have a go myself too. But I'm sure one of the ShapeShifter skinning types will be along shortly to fix it.
 
ktb53 said:
I have been waiting forever for this. I want to be able to browse by CD album cover, Their all in there, come on iTunes, this would be simple to do!

You realize that iTuns has no concept of "albums" as an entity, right? I mean, yeah, you've got cover art for your songs, and you've got album names, and you've even got artist names. But, what's the cover art for an album? Who's the artist for an album? Do you just pick one from the various songs which happen to share the same album name? Or would you want iTunes to be doing a binary-blob diff on the cover art for each song and show a list of all unique images (even if one "album name" has four different cover arts, or three "album names" all share the same cover art)?

It's "doable", but I wouldn't call it "simple". There are some hard design decisions to make, and even then you won't be making more than half your customers happy no matter which way you go!
 
Elektronkind said:
You know what I'm really really missing from iTunes? The ability to sync songs to one's iPod at a lower quality codec/bitrate.

Yeah... this is really, really needed.
 
aegisdesign said:
It's the first time I've actually wanted to dig out a copy of ResEdit and have a go myself too. But I'm sure one of the ShapeShifter skinning types will be along shortly to fix it.

This is the first time I am going to tamper with Apples OS in regards to the UI. There is always a first time for everything, and I feel this is that time. :p :D
 
"Last Played" for iPod Shuffle / iTunes 5

A search didn't pull up anything on this...chastise me if it's been mentioned.

I plugged in my shuffle after updating to iTunes 5 and noticed something new.

For those who don't have Shuffles and haven't paid attention, iTunes used to update the "Play Count" but not "Last Played" when the tracks were played on shuffle. (This is because the Shuffles don't have a clock, and so they don't know when they were played, only that they were.)

Well now iTunes is showing data for "Last Played" for the songs on my Shuffle playlist. It seems that it uses the time you sync after having played the songs on the Shuffle. (For example, all of the tracks on my Shuffle now show "9/7/05 4:57 PM" in the "Last Played" column.

Not sure what I think of this development, as it isn't exactly correct...
 
jettredmont said:
It's "doable", but I wouldn't call it "simple". There are some hard design decisions to make, and even then you won't be making more than half your customers happy no matter which way you go!


Actually, its rather simple. You NAME the Album art, and browse via that. Not hard at all. Link the Album name and song name to the Album art and you are gold. :)

Maybe version 5.0.1
 
bankshot said:
I disagree completely. First, I don't want to waste double the disk space. There's no reason I should have to. Second, I want the freedom to skip a track in the middle of a gapless playback session if the urge suddenly strikes me. That doesn't usually happen, but I want that freedom, just like I have with any CD player. Finally, I want every time I listen to a song, gapless or not, to increment that song's play count and last-played time. This method will not do that, so it is unacceptable to me.

Like I've already said, the solution is easy. Apple has simply chosen to ignore it for no good reason.



Again, I completely disagree. You're suggesting that I go audiophile, which I see as absolutely ridiculous. Every method of listening to music has an inherent loss to it (CDs truncate audio to a "mere" 16 bits of precision at 44.1 kHz, vinyl -- which audiophiles love -- has a horribly worse signal to noise ratio than CD, etc), but my real experience is that iTunes/iPod are perfectly acceptable given decent (not high end - those are for suckers) speakers or headphones and a quiet environment. I care about listening the music, not spending $100k to gratify my ego that my "golden ears" will be satisfied with the quality of audio reproduction (you can guess that my opinion of audiophiles is a low one). And to me, removing the gaps between tracks is vastly more important than squeezing out some tiny extra amount of audio "quality" that no human ears can distinguish in the first place.

Like we often say about many Apple products, the appeal is in the overall experience. For me and my listening preferences, that includes:

  • All of my ~5,000 songs at my fingertips
  • Organizing my music into playlists, both manually and based on logical criteria (smart)
  • Find based on song title, album, artist, and metadata quickly
  • Good audio quality (not cheap, not over the top)
  • Several shuffle options, including album, song, and playlist shuffling
  • Seamless integration between my software jukebox and my portable device
  • Update metadata such as play count, last played time, etc for any song that's played
  • Play full albums without gaps between tracks
  • Ability to skip tracks when doing any of the above

That's what does it for me. Give me a system that meets all of those, I'm in heaven. Force me to work around any of them or simply don't provide some of them, and I'm a cranky old bastard. iTunes/iPod gives me all but the last two (and the one above them, when speaking of gapless playback). If gapless had never been done before, I wouldn't care (and if so, nobody would ever release an album that required it, so it'd be a moot point). But since it's been done in a much simpler device over 20 years ago, such that much available music depends on it, I feel like I have a right to complain. What bothers me so much is I know it's not that difficult. They just don't care.

Of course, Apple has no obligation to listen. But I will continue to actively search for a replacement if they continue to ignore this request (I'm not the only one). The first company that gives me all of the above points will get my business. Unfortunately all of Apple's competitors fall short in some of the other areas, so I continue to wait.

For you, your solution may be just fine, and I'm happy that it works for you. For me, I will continue to wait for whoever wants to attract my business with a better product.


i completly agree, please let me know if you find a better product :)
i'd love to develop one for my thesis or something, think: sub genres, GOOD car integration, a wide range of audio formats (like FLAC and Vorbis) and most importantly gapless!!
 
qtip919 said:
ok Apple...this is getting rediculous

From the supposed "leaders" in user interface, I now have 3 distinct looks to my applications, which quite frankly renders my user interface cluttered and disorganized. One of my favorite things about the apple user interface is the clean, unobtrusive look and feel.

Now, however, the look and feel is feeling like a tattered set of high-school term papers...each with a pathetic "best attempt" at its own look...

GET IT STRAIGHT APPLE...PICK A FREAKING COMMON UI LOOK AND GO WITH IT!!!!!

sheesh

I mean, does anyone besides me look over at the scroll bar with the residual aqua UI and think...something here just doesnt belong

Would you like Tiger to be showing off the wonderful GUI of Platinum again? ;)

As for me, the GUI is really irrelevant. Between Synergy, AirClick, and the Symphonic widget, I never have iTunes showing anyway.
 
Gapless play back

Call me out on this...

But you know that when you're importing a CD, you can highlight all the tracks on the CD, then go to "Advanced" -> "Join CD tracks" and it makes them gapless....

So difficult.

Oh and the iPod Shuffle allows you to switch to a lower bitrate when importing. I don't understand why they'd limit this feature to ONLY the shuffle.

Then again, I can't plug my shuffle into another computer and play my tracks off of *it*.

Weird priorities.
 
rockman2023 said:
I don't know if this was quoted/replied to already, but here's my 2 cents on this "issue".

When I first started using looping sounds in Flash 5, I noticed that my sounds would ALWAYS have a brief pause before starting again. What I didn't know is that I should've been using uncompressed audio such as AIFF or WAV instead of MP3s. So, I'm under the assumption that over 90% of the population has a majority, if not all, of their music in some compressed format, and therefore, experiences gapped playback.

All in all, maybe it's not necessarily Apple's fault that there is gapped playback in-between mp3s. I haven't tested this in iTunes, or Winamp as bankshot claims.

Anyone, feel free to correct me, if necessary.

In most formats, such as mp3, the audio is stored in frames, the file length must be a multiple of one of these frames which means that most files are going to have a partially empty last frame, this is the silence at the end of an mp3. There are 2 solutions to this, in the audio file can be stored information about where the music actually ends, or the software can look at the last frame of the file and delete any silence.

Most newish formats support adding data to the track to tell the player where the music actually ends, OGG does, Flac does, MP3 does with the latest lame codecs, and i'm pretty sure AAC does as well.

So there is no excuse for no gapless playback
 
Mavimao said:
Call me out on this...

But you know that when you're importing a CD, you can highlight all the tracks on the CD, then go to "Advanced" -> "Join CD tracks" and it makes them gapless....

So difficult.

Oh and the iPod Shuffle allows you to switch to a lower bitrate when importing. I don't understand why they'd limit this feature to ONLY the shuffle.

Then again, I can't plug my shuffle into another computer and play my tracks off of *it*.

Weird priorities.

sure but then whats the use of having the itunes interface, i'm only going to have a few dozen "tracks" and they are all going to be close to 80 minutes long.

i cant search for tracks, i cant skip between tracks on a cd etc. etc.

how come on other players it works fine (winamp, mpd, foobar) but i have to use a crappy workaround like this for itunes/ipod
 
WildCowboy said:
For those who don't have Shuffles and haven't paid attention, iTunes used to update the "Play Count" but not "Last Played" when the tracks were played on shuffle. (This is because the Shuffles don't have a clock, and so they don't know when they were played, only that they were.)

Well now iTunes is showing data for "Last Played" for the songs on my Shuffle playlist. It seems that it uses the time you sync after having played the songs on the Shuffle. (For example, all of the tracks on my Shuffle now show "9/7/05 4:57 PM" in the "Last Played" column.

Not sure what I think of this development, as it isn't exactly correct...
I actually suggested they add this feature (as a user-defined preference) on the iPod feedback page when I got my Shuffle. Reason being I have a number of complex and combined smart playlists that depend on "Last Played" being greater than x number of days, and if I played the songs on my Shuffle then they would not "fall off" those playlists in iTunes or on my big iPod. Then I might have to hear the same songs again before I was ready :eek:! I have been using a rather roundabout and unreliable script from Doug's Scripts to do the same thing.

It should be a preference for the Shuffle though, a checkbox that you can choose "Set Last Played to time Shuffle connects" or something like that. I see not everyone necessarily wants this. But it will only be off by a few hours at most unless you keep your Shuffle away from your computer for days at a time (possible of course).

Oh and the iTunes 5 interface is the pits. WAY too square all over!!
 
The new UI in iTunes has sparked some discussion on where is Apple UI going. So below I have included a quick Photoshop montage of Finder according to the changes that were made to iTunes.

What do you guys think, Mac OS 10.5 Leopard?
 

Attachments

  • finder.jpg
    finder.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 240
Lyrics

So this lyrics thing is sort of cool, but what's now sorely missing is the ability to search / create a smart playlist on lyrics.

Let's pretend you had loaded lyrics into most or all of your library -- I don't know if that's farfetched or not -- then you needed to come up with a "theme mix", say all songs about winter or whatnot. It would be so cool to make a smart playlist of all songs where the words "winter", "snow", "december", "christmas", etc. were in the title OR in the lyrics. Now, that would be cool. But you can't do it, because lyrics aren't an option in the smart playlist settings.

More short term, I was hoping to do a quick scan to see if any of my existing 5000+ songs had lyrics already loaded into them (assuming Apple is using some standard MP3 tag for lyrics), but really, there's no way to do this unless I'm just totally missing it.

Oh well. Must be either it's too much of a CPU hog to search on lyrics, or Apple just forgot.
 
aegisdesign said:
Just delete the 'Podcasts' artist. See my earlier post...

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/1718810/

Hey aegisdesign,

Your strategy worked for me for all the podcasts that were already on my hard drive, and that made me really excited, but when I downloaded a new podcast, it went straight into my main library. Meanewhile, the others I'd fixed stayed nicely in the Podcast section. Did I do something wrong? When new podcasts download to your Mac, do they stay within the Podcasts section?

Thanks :)
 
I think the 5.0 interface is better than 4.9. They should give all the iApps and Safari this look. There's always been differences between the apps, but now this is too much. Mail, Safari and iTunes look very weird together.
I'm guessing they were thinking about Windows users as well with this design, or maybe it's simply the look we'll be seeing in iLife '06.

Finally folders in iTunes!! I can't believe how we used iTunes without them. The search bar (or whatever it's called) is pretty neat as well.
Unfortunately, video playback is pretty much the same as before. No fullscreen controls, slow and choppy resizing. Seems like Apple isn't planning on making iTunes the program to control all your digital media... yet. iPod video? They really have to make those changes if they're actually going to ever make it...
 
Mac_Freak said:
The new UI in iTunes has sparked some discussion on where is Apple UI going. So below I have included a quick Photoshop motage of Finder according to the changes that were made to iTunes.

What do you guys think, Mac OS 10.5 Leopard?

I think it looks nice. The first place we got this look was in the System Preferences in Panther IIRC. I like it.
Is it possible that we could see it in a smaller update? (10.4.3 for example..)
 
oskar said:
I think it looks nice. The first place we got this look was in the System Preferences in Panther IIRC. I like it.
Is it possible that we could see it in a smaller update? (10.4.3 for example..)

this is the same I am thinknig. the next update 10.4.3 is supposed to provide fixes to almost all the corners of the OS and its standard apps. With that, they could just include new UI for Tiger and unify the look.

Mail.app could have been just the early stage of this new UI and we may expect a the final.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.