tkermit said:You guys do remember what the Windows 7 login screen looks like, right?
![]()
Windows' look much better
? I was running DP2 with the server additions and DP3 appeared in Software Update. I'm now running DP3.
Update 05/14/2011 at 6:34 AM PDT: According to multiple reports it appears that the Mac OS X 10.7 Lion Preview 3 isn’t currently available for people that have the server version of Preview 2 installed.
Cupertino - start your photocopiers!
Seriously though, considering what's important for a login screen, one should not be surprised if different operating systems have similar login screens.
And what exactly is that?
Two can play this game.![]()
The only problem I have with Finder is stability, it does crash quite frequently on my Mac Pro, and I think it's because I have 9 External HD's connected through eSata PCI-E cards which have bad drivers or something. On my MBP with a single drive, it doesn't really crash.
Sounds more like the eSATA card's drivers are the culprit here, not Finder.![]()
Mac OS X is 10 years old. Why do you think it's not there for 10 whole years? Is it hard to implement or something else?
Not at all, it's certainly not hard to implement, after all they did implement copy/paste a while ago, and cut shouldn't really be any different.
We all know Apple think less is more, and 99% of the time I agree. But the lack of cut is one of those 1% situations where I disagree.
Safari is WAY faster than in Preview 2. Everything is instantaneous it used to take about 2 seconds.
? I was running DP2 with the server additions and DP3 appeared in Software Update. I'm now running DP3.
With rev 2, Safari in full screen going previous page was a breeze, the animation was nice (like turning a page) and before the animation was finished the page was already available, like it was stored in memory somewhere for immediate availability.
Now with rev3, going back seems to reload the page, waiting 2,3 secs before page is again available.
Is it just me?![]()
Cut and paste is really overrated. I can't remember the last time I wanted it for moving my files.
But yes, if they could get the terminal level implementation 10 years, back, they could easily get it to work in the Finder. I really don't think cut/paste is a big deal after all.
Cut and paste is really overrated. I can't remember the last time I wanted it for moving my files.
But yes, if they could get the terminal level implementation 10 years, back, they could easily get it to work in the Finder. I really don't think cut/paste is a big deal after all.
It's not a "big deal", but I have 15 external HD's and I move files around a lot, and cut would speed up my workflow in some scenarios a bit. Certainly I can do without it but Finder is already good enough of a file browser and anything which would be add after this point would be small things like cut.
That is your opinion. The majority of people who also use Windows as well as the few who also dig Linux distros will be used to using Cut & Paste. OS X still feels slightly alien to me due to the lack of it, and I've been using OS X since 2005.
Posting this from Windows Server 2003.
I use windows constantly. And being honest, I have hardly used cut and paste in the last 10 years of computing I have done. Simple.
You are a power user and have no use for cut and paste. The average user (such as myself) does it seems.
It it wasn't a wanted feature, why do you think it has been requested so much?
Re-read my post. I clearly said that was you opinion but not the way of the average customer who is non-techy and used to Windows. I was not in any way saying that you never use Windows. You are a power user and have no use for cut and paste. The average user (such as myself) does it seems.
It it wasn't a wanted feature, why do you think it has been requested so much?