Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anyone else pissed off that the MacBooks that can most use this battery management right now, older ones, don't have the feature?

I know Apple wants us to upgrade our hardware but at least don't be so blatant about it.

Yep. I'm not happy I can't use it on my early 2014 MacBook Air. What's the point in limiting it unless there is a specific hardware issue which means it physically wouldn't work..?
 
It needs to fix the issue with Mail popping up all the time!

Seems like Sooo often I close a window and the damn Mail window is open right behind it when I never actually brought it up! so annoying.


Seriously, this bug pales in comparison with what other people are experiencing with their Macs but still – so annoying. Same thing with how it keeps shuffling my multiple inbox folders. Mail (kinda) worked fine before Catalina…
 
Anyone else pissed off that the MacBooks that can most use this battery management right now, older ones, don't have the feature?

is this why my 6 year old 13" macbook pro doesn't have the battery management feature show up after the update?
 
Is anyone still experiencing icons issues? With RAR files for example?

I installed The Unarchiver the icons showed up perfectly.
Once I installed VLC to watch movies the icons shows incorrect with a Blank Page with The Unarchiver logo on it.

From what I've seen in the forums, this is happening with other apps.

See this for example:

https://github.com/aonez/Keka/issues/453

Keka shows wrong as well.

Some people say that PDF files, Excel, also have similar problems with Acrobat...

Is anyone getting this issue?
 
Did you get AppleCare+ On your new Mac? ;)
haha no. It took me over 6 years to break the old one, and I could've repaired it but decided a new base model Air would be better, and not too much more. Love the Air - surprised that the drop from a 15 to 13" screen stopped being noticeable after a couple of days.
 
So a 3Gb+ update that took nearly an hour to install/reboot on my 2020 MacBook Pro just to avoid prematurely killing my battery? 🧐
 
Is anyone still experiencing icons issues? With RAR files for example?

I installed The Unarchiver the icons showed up perfectly.
Once I installed VLC to watch movies the icons shows incorrect with a Blank Page with The Unarchiver logo on it.

From what I've seen in the forums, this is happening with other apps.

See this for example:

https://github.com/aonez/Keka/issues/453

Keka shows wrong as well.

Some people say that PDF files, Excel, also have similar problems with Acrobat...

Is anyone getting this issue?

Yes, I am getting exactly the same issue. I reported it Apple, and I was hoping this update would fix it, but it seems it won't do.
 
Just updated to 10.15.5 using the combo update. All went well. Some were reporting that after they updated their System Preferences were messed up (Shared named reset, Users & Groups unlocked), not seeing this.

There is one thing that I have been chasing though which happened in 10.15.4 and now 10.15.5, every time that I logout and log back in, folders named Recovered Files show up in the trash. It happens with all user accounts. Very strange. Anyone have any experience with this happening to them?

EDIT: Just got done chatting with a senior Apple advisor. The reason why the Recovered Files folder shows up in the trash is because an application can't deleted its temporary files on a unexpected shutdown or restart. It is a known issue with Catalina. But the twist in my situation is that I am logging out and back in so it is not an unpicked situation. I sent the Recovered Files folder up to Apple for them to look at. This is just a minor inconvenience bug.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-05-27 at 2.03.05 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-05-27 at 2.03.05 PM.png
    144.1 KB · Views: 115
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: edubfromktown
2017 Macbook built in 2018 does not have this feature, even after SMC reset.

Is this because the MacBook batter is Lithium Polymer and not Li-Ion?
 
So a 3Gb+ update that took nearly an hour to install/reboot on my 2020 MacBook Pro just to avoid prematurely killing my battery? 🧐
No, a 3gb+ update that took nearly a hour to install/reboot on your 2020 MacBook Pro that fixed a host of security holes, took care of more than a few issues, and added a handful of new features, such as the Battery Health Management.

Not that anyone ever reads changelogs.
 
macOS is so much better, cleaner, more stable than Windows? Which year did you get in a coma and only woke up today, and didn’t get to use a Mac yet? 2010? Any software made by Apple is **** now, sorry no one told you. Just wait until you hear about the butterfly keyboards too...

Yeah, funny that they would develop a feature that’s most needed by older users (that’s the batteries that, if not tended to properly, will fail after a short while), yet only bothered to test on newer hardware. Surely they’re not trying to make people think “well if I buy another battery for this 2015 Mac that’s working perfectly fine (other than the battery), I will have to buy another battery pretty soon, so I might as well open up the wallet and buy new hardware where the battery lasts longer.”

Also, I know for a fact that the commands sent to the battery to stop charging exist on a 1998 standard. If the battery adheres to that standard (and Apple’s do, they did since my first 17” first or second-gen MacBook Pro), it should be a piece of cake to implement. They already have to do Q&A for the whole OS on that hardware, so why not add a tiny little extra workload to test the one feature that would actually be useful for users with older computers? Surely they’re not more excited about whatever new Emoji set Apple added to the OS in the latest update?

The funny part is that the core of the Al Dente could be written in a few dozen lines: it just writes a byte to one SMC key. The Q&A is all the hardware itself, which presumably has been done already.

To conclude: if Apple really won’t do this because of the extra Q&A workload, but does care about its users, why not release documentation on this SMC key so people could write unsupported software that does the same thing?

A whole lot more codswallop.

For one, you completely fail to understand Apple’s primary user base - NOT people who are interested in writing their own battery maintenance software. Good grief.

Two, Software made by Apple now is not ****. Sure, some of it kinda sucks some of the time. A small amount of it sticks all the time, but most of it, almost all of the time, is still better than Windows - for the vast majority of normal users. Clearly you are not a “normal” user since you like to get into things like coding hardware tweaks. You can’t possibly think that’s typical of Mac users. You are further from Apple’s target market than pretty much anyone else I’ve seen on this forum or anywhere else. So, sure, for you, Apple’s stuff sucks. Fair enough. The question begs, what on earth are you doing here on an Apple forum?

Three, the hugely enormous piece that you seem to miss is that the point of this battery management software is to keep relatively newer batteries healthy. It's virtually impossible for this to be of any use to an older battery - the damage is already done. This is about making currently healthy batteries stay longer. It is virtually useless to older batteries so what point is there in putting in that extra work to make this available to 5+ year old hardware? Further to this point: your “batteries that, if not tended to properly, will fail” misses the point also. Batteries don’t normally just cruise along fine and then suddenly die. They slowly deteriorate.Again, for these older batteries the damage is done. And if you buy a new battery now for that older computer how much longer is that computer going to last? Longer than this second battery? Is a laptop that’s 5+ yrs old now - good battery or not, really going to be worth anything in another four years?

Four, you tout all these impressive sounding words/acronyms like API etc that any decent software developer knows but that’s as far as you go. You demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of a hard core coder, but no understanding of complete software development, QA, testing, refining, and release of a real marketable product. Rest assured it’s a lot more than just a few lines of code for Apple to make this work on anything and I’m sure most of Apple’s users - myself included - would prefer they spend their resources on making today’s stuff work better, not put those resources into the almost entirely futile effort of trying to maintain 5+ year old batteries.

As others here have posted, if you have an old Mac laptop you can get the battery replaced with a brand new one for $129 in most cases. Get over it.

Your posts have expressed your disdain for almost entirely everything Apple - their hardware, software, philosophies, and priorities. So what are you doing here???? Windows and Linux cater to your preferences, priorities, and philosophies so much better than Apple. Why are you here, other than to troll?
 
Does this actually fix the number 1 problem with Catalina? Terrible UI performance? My iMac is three years old and I cant use it. I downgraded back to Mojave.
 
Yes, it is plugged in most of the time. If I purposefully ran it on battery when a charger was available, batteries would last only 2 years or maybe even less. Batteries last only for a given, although highly variable, number of cycles (keeping the battery half-full does increase the number of discharge cycles before the battery dies, as well as some other measures such as avoiding hot temperatures, slow charging, etc.), so putting on extra cycles aiming to make the battery last longer will have the opposite of the intended effect.

Unless your computer is a toy which you use only once a week, then you can unplug it during your weekly use session and leave the battery half-full, not plugged in to power, until next week; unfortunately mine needs to be used every day. Good thing this is easily remedied by the battery management feature which is unfortunately quite a few years too late (BTW, this feature existed in the PC space, at least for certain manufacturers, for many years).

12 V car batteries are lead-acid, about the only thing in common with a Li-Ion battery is that they're both called a battery. There's simply no way they can last long given the chemistry and the load profile (cranking up an engine is about the worst load you could conjure up for a battery). This is a fact, and before you ask, I won't bother digging up "The Science", I have read up on it and I know that it is out there for those who bother to look it up.

A better comparison is to EV batteries: would you buy an EV if its batteries only lasted for 5 years? Don't tell me there is a difference between EVs and MacBook Pros, the only difference is that EV automakers were forced to think about battery lifespan management from the start, exactly because the market wouldn't take too kindly to 5-year battery replacements. The minute Apple switched to internal, non-user-replaceable batteries, they should have done the same if they really cared about their users (especially since a 7-year old computer is considered vintage and will be refused service at Apple stores or AASPs, leaving you to use Chinese junk of dubious precedence, which may explode and set you/your house on fire.)

Seriously dude... what do you actually use your Mac(s) for? Why do you actually need to hold on to these things for so long?

Bottom line: You’re buying it wrong. Technology keeps rapidly changing. That’s a “fact” if you want to keep throwing “facts” around. These things are simply not designed to keep up with technology for 5+ years. If you want a computer that had today’s features get today’s computer. If you don’t need all the power and performance of today’s pro computers then get a refurbished or 1-2 year old one off eBay for a lot less than a new one.

Computers are generally either consumption devices or work tools. You said you need yours every day, and imply fairly heavy use. That implies work. What work are you doing with it that doesn’t pay for it? It’s like a cab driver complaining that his cab keeps breaking down after it’s got five years and 300,000 miles on it.

Apple is NOT interested in catering to the market of people who want to use five year old hardware. They never have been. Macs have good resale value because they happen to last longer and work well for longer but most people who buy the five year old computers from the rest of us offloading them at that time, understand that they’re getting old tech including old software sometimes.

Your entitled attitude that Apple SHOULD be catering to you and your 5+ yo hardware completely misunderstands Apple’s products, business model, pholosophies, and reason for existing. And don’t be blaming Tim for this. This was the same under Steve as well. And it’s been a recipe for success - for Apple, Apple developers, and Apple customers, the entire time since Steve returned in 1997. If Apple was ever any different it was when they nearly went bankrupt right before that.

Grow up.
 
You can use 100% of your battery's capacity, just don't expect it to last as long as if you accepted some compromises intended to maximize its lifespan. As with anything in engineering, there are tradeoffs -- if you want your battery to last as long as possible on a single charge, just don't expect it to last as many charge cycles as possible. Nothing prevents you from driving your car in the redline all the time, just don't expect it to last for as many hundred thousand of miles as your neighbor's car who drives it at 2000 RPM all the time.

Apple is doing this, Tesla (and probably every other EV manufacturer) is doing this. Did you know the Prius battery only uses 40% to 80% of its range? i.e. when the battery display is showing the full 8/8 bars, it's actually at 80% charge.

Like it or not, that's how batteries work.
100% battery means the battery stays at a higher voltage which speeds up battery degradation. IIRC, Li-ion batteries are happiest at 50% to keep voltages low but it's not really practical. 70% is probably the best trade off between battery degradation and daily usage.

this new macOS battery management feature keeps batteries under 100% even when plugged in. if you really need 100% everyday, you'll turn this feature off.
Science:

Note Figure 1:
View attachment 918997

So... shall I pull the plug out of my macbook when it reaches 80% until it depletes to 5% and then charge it up to 80% again? Its always on 100% most of the time as it is plugged in. In past time, the more you deplete your battery and charge i all the way up again kills it faster(battery cycle) and keeping it plugged in at 100% was best IIRc, has this been changed?

Is there a study for how long the battery will last if it is always charged at 100% compared to 80%?
I tend to keep my smartphone 2-3 years, if its not going to be affected in such time frame then I rather use the 100% of the capacity. I don't my battery to last 10 years.
 
Last edited:
A whole lot more codswallop.

For one, you completely fail to understand Apple’s primary user base - NOT people who are interested in writing their own battery maintenance software. Good grief.

Definitely not. It's targeted to people who are easily wowed by horse manure like (direct quote from Apple's page "About Optimized Battery Charging on your iPhone"): "Your iPhone uses on-device machine learning to learn your daily charging routine so that Optimized Battery Charging activates only when your iPhone predicts it will be connected to a charger for an extended period of time." Translation: let's pretend that we're managing battery health, but the feature doesn't really work at all (I recall it working for only one night for me ever since installing iOS 13 on launch day), so batteries still die at the exact same rate as before, and it's still too expensive to replace them given how old the hardware is, so guess what? People upgrade on cue as their batteries die!

If I were responsible for this feature, I'd just sync it to the alarm clock. It'd certainly work heaps better than that load of horse manure quoted above.

Two, Software made by Apple now is not ****. Sure, some of it kinda sucks some of the time. A small amount of it sticks all the time, but most of it, almost all of the time, is still better than Windows - for the vast majority of normal users. Clearly you are not a “normal” user since you like to get into things like coding hardware tweaks. You can’t possibly think that’s typical of Mac users. You are further from Apple’s target market than pretty much anyone else I’ve seen on this forum or anywhere else. So, sure, for you, Apple’s stuff sucks. Fair enough. The question begs, what on earth are you doing here on an Apple forum?

Who died and made you god to decide who's worthy of using an Apple computer? Do you have some sort of Seinfeld soup nazi complex? What's especially odd is how, on the marketing page for the 16" MBP, three of the quoted benchmarks (Matlab, Mathematica and Xcode) are tools I use daily, and a fourth (NASA/CFD) is not far from the kinds of workloads that I run. I wonder why 1/3 of the quoted benchmarks on that page are directly relevant to my work if they're not trying to sell the computer to someone like me.

You can try to pat yourself in the back all you want, but just go back to the first page of this thread and start reading. See how many different people are complaining about how many different bugs.

Three, the hugely enormous piece that you seem to miss is that the point of this battery management software is to keep relatively newer batteries healthy. It's virtually impossible for this to be of any use to an older battery - the damage is already done. This is about making currently healthy batteries stay longer. It is virtually useless to older batteries so what point is there in putting in that extra work to make this available to 5+ year old hardware? Further to this point: your “batteries that, if not tended to properly, will fail” misses the point also. Batteries don’t normally just cruise along fine and then suddenly die. They slowly deteriorate.Again, for these older batteries the damage is done. And if you buy a new battery now for that older computer how much longer is that computer going to last? Longer than this second battery? Is a laptop that’s 5+ yrs old now - good battery or not, really going to be worth anything in another four years?

Clearly you have zero idea what you are talking about if you think a 5-year old battery can't benefit from battery management. I'm using my app on a 2014 MacBook Air who spent five years kept at 100% charge all the time. I'm confident the battery will last another 3 years, at least, which it certainly wouldn't without battery management. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if it lasted 5 years.

Four, you tout all these impressive sounding words/acronyms like API etc that any decent software developer knows but that’s as far as you go. You demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of a hard core coder, but no understanding of complete software development, QA, testing, refining, and release of a real marketable product. Rest assured it’s a lot more than just a few lines of code for Apple to make this work on anything and I’m sure most of Apple’s users - myself included - would prefer they spend their resources on making today’s stuff work better, not put those resources into the almost entirely futile effort of trying to maintain 5+ year old batteries.

I'm sure Apple's QA practices are beyond any reproach, especially today in 2020.

Good thing the Al Dente developer somehow unearthed the relevant SMC key and made it available to everyone. It'd be great if Apple publicized the API rather than trying to hide it at all costs, but it's not surprising that they do.

As others here have posted, if you have an old Mac laptop you can get the battery replaced with a brand new one for $129 in most cases. Get over it.

Heh, it's funny talking to Americans. They can't possibly fathom that things may work differently elsewhere. It's almost as if the world is America.

Where I live, the cost of replacing a MacBook battery is two months of the monthly national minimum wage.

Let's try to frame it in a way you could understand: would your opinion be exactly the same if replacing a battery cost you $1,000? Especially if a simple software fix (which, for all I know, Apple still hasn't implemented, if the macOS implementation is anything like the iPhone optimized charging feature) could easily double the lifespan of the battery?

Your posts have expressed your disdain for almost entirely everything Apple - their hardware, software, philosophies, and priorities. So what are you doing here???? Windows and Linux cater to your preferences, priorities, and philosophies so much better than Apple. Why are you here, other than to troll?

Truth be told, inertia. I switched way back when Steve Jobs was still alive and Apple had products they were actually proud of and cared about. Currently, if I had to choose which of 2020 Apple or 2020 Microsoft better fit that description, there's no question the right answer is 2020 Microsoft.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ron
Anyone else pissed off that the MacBooks that can most use this battery management right now, older ones, don't have the feature?

I know Apple wants us to upgrade our hardware but at least don't be so blatant about it.

Probably because those of us with the older ones don’t have a particular chip that is needed for the feature to work.
 
I have been putting off upgrading to Catalina due to the Mail issues that were reported after release. Can anyone confirm that it is now safe to upgrade from a Mail perspective?

I saw no reason to upgrade until shared iCloud Drive folders were available, but now that they are I’d like to do so, but absolutely not at the potential expense of risk to my 25 years of mail archives.

I've got 20+ years of email archives too. I've also got this great thing called a backup drive that I use regularly :)
 
Seriously dude... what do you actually use your Mac(s) for? Why do you actually need to hold on to these things for so long?

Bottom line: You’re buying it wrong. Technology keeps rapidly changing. That’s a “fact” if you want to keep throwing “facts” around. These things are simply not designed to keep up with technology for 5+ years. If you want a computer that had today’s features get today’s computer. If you don’t need all the power and performance of today’s pro computers then get a refurbished or 1-2 year old one off eBay for a lot less than a new one.

Like I said, you Americans can't picture that things may be different elsewhere.

I just configured a 16" MacBook Pro with the same config as my 2018 15" MacBook Pro, both in the US store and in my local store. It's 18% cheaper than what I paid for it at the time. In my local store, the 16" MacBook Pro currently costs 2/3 of the price I paid for my brand new car last year (you read that right, it's not a used car, I took it straight out of the dealer). So taking that 18% difference into account, we're talking 80% of the price of a new car. And I expect prices to further increase because of local currency devaluation.

Are you starting to get the picture how some people might need computers to last more than a couple years? Rest assured this is the real situation around most of the world -- America is the exception, not the rule.

Computers are generally either consumption devices or work tools. You said you need yours every day, and imply fairly heavy use. That implies work. What work are you doing with it that doesn’t pay for it? It’s like a cab driver complaining that his cab keeps breaking down after it’s got five years and 300,000 miles on it.

It's my personal computer which I bring into work so I don't have to use a 10- or 15-year old PC. Like I said, as an American you wouldn't be able to understand the need to do that. The classic movie scene with an advertising agency office with hundreds of Macs in view is far, far removed from reality in many places of the world.

I'm salaried, I'll make the same at the end of the month whether I use the computer or the 10/15-year old PC, it's just my life would be totally miserable with the PC. So, I use it for work, and work doesn't pay for it. Not impossible after all, right?

Apple is NOT interested in catering to the market of people who want to use five year old hardware. They never have been. Macs have good resale value because they happen to last longer and work well for longer but most people who buy the five year old computers from the rest of us offloading them at that time, understand that they’re getting old tech including old software sometimes.

Great to see you're confirming my theory of planned obsolescence. Luckily I'm resourceful enough to work around these artificial limits imposed by Apple. Others, though, will just leave the ecosystem.

Your entitled attitude that Apple SHOULD be catering to you and your 5+ yo hardware completely misunderstands Apple’s products, business model, pholosophies, and reason for existing. And don’t be blaming Tim for this. This was the same under Steve as well. And it’s been a recipe for success - for Apple, Apple developers, and Apple customers, the entire time since Steve returned in 1997. If Apple was ever any different it was when they nearly went bankrupt right before that.

Grow up.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that I have 5 year old hardware -- like I said, I have a 2018 MacBook Pro.

All I'm trying to point out is, Apple is needlessly screwing over the users most likely to be the first in line for upgrades -- I don't think people who just bought a 2020 MacBook Pro is going to be thinking about upgrades so soon. Here's hoping they remember Apple tried to screw them when they could have easily helped them.

It looks like you are, literally, invested in Apple (as in, a stockholder) and you're trying so hard to pretend everything is fine because you, too, see that it's not. From my view, the same people who were switching in droves from PCs to Mac ~10 years ago are looking to switch back (myself included).
[automerge]1590628768[/automerge]
Probably because those of us with the older ones don’t have a particular chip that is needed for the feature to work.

Not true. Similar software works on much older Macs. It's a case of planned obsolescence.
[automerge]1590628962[/automerge]
So... shall I pull the plug out of my macbook when it reaches 80% until it depletes to 5% and then charge it up to 80% again? Its always on 100% most of the time as it is plugged in. In past time, the more you deplete your battery and charge i all the way up again kills it faster(battery cycle) and keeping it plugged in at 100% was best IIRc, has this been changed?

Is there a study for how long the battery will last if it is always charged at 100% compared to 80%?
I tend to keep my smartphone 2-3 years, if its not going to be affected in such time frame then I rather use the 100% of the capacity. I don't my battery to last 10 years.

Nothing changed. Keeping it plugged in at 100% has always been harmful (certainly for Li-Ion/LiPo batteries this has always been true). If anyone ever told you differently, they had no idea what they were talking about.

If all you aspire to is a battery that lasts 2-3 years, then you can do absolutely anything you want with your battery, it'll most likely last that long. We're talking people who want to have a usable (not like-new, usable) battery in 5 years.
 
What do you have in your crash log, if I may ask?

Below is from the second crash. And it happened while I was checking mail, MBP was not even sleeping... The first crash happened during sleep.. Those are the two crashes I had since updating to 10.15.5 yesterday.

Source: /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/.contents.panic


Size: 6 KB (6,190 bytes)


Last Modified: 5/28/20, 12:48 AM


Recent Contents: {"files_to_attach":["\/Library\/Logs\/DiagnosticReports\/Kernel_2020-05-28-004831_Djerovins-MacBook-Pro.panic"],"log_path":"\/Library\/Logs\/DiagnosticReports\/Kernel_2020-05-28-004831_Djerovins-MacBook-Pro.panic","panic_string":"panic(cpu 0 caller 0xffffff7f9084b231): nvme: \"Fatal error occurred. ID=0xffffffff ARG1=0xffffffff ARG2=0xffffffff ARG3=0xffffffff EDD0=0xffffffff EDD1=0xffffffff EDD2=0xffffffff EDD3=0xffffffff EDD4=0xffffffff EDD5=0xffffffff EDD6=0xffffffff EDD7=0xffffffff NANDV=0x1, DRAMV=0x1, SSDC=128GB. FW Revision=16.14.01\\n\"@\/AppleInternal\/BuildRoot\/Library\/Caches\/com.apple.xbs\/Sources\/IONVMeFamily\/IONVMeFamily-470.100.17\/IONVMeController.cpp:5320\nBacktrace (CPU 0), Frame : Return Address\n0xffffff8121da39e0 : 0xffffff800eb1f5cd \n0xffffff8121da3a30 : 0xffffff800ec58b05 \n0xffffff8121da3a70 : 0xffffff800ec4a68e \n0xffffff8121da3ac0 : 0xffffff800eac5a40 \n0xffffff8121da3ae0 : 0xffffff800eb1ec97 \n0xffffff8121da3be0 : 0xffffff800eb1f087 \n0xffffff8121da3c30 : 0xffffff800f2c27ec \n0xffffff8121da3ca0 : 0xffffff7f9084b231 \n0xffffff8121da3cc0 : 0xffffff7f90836362 \n0xffffff8121da3e20 : 0xffffff800f233409 \n0xffffff8121da3e90 : 0xffffff800f233329 \n0xffffff8121da3ec0 : 0xffffff800eb61565 \n0xffffff8121da3f40 : 0xffffff800eb61091 \n0xffffff8121da3fa0 : 0xffffff800eac513e \n Kernel Extensions in backtrace:\n com.apple.iokit.IONVMeFamily(2.1)[1898DCFE-5C18-3D87-B9E7-DFC0D22FD7EE]@0xffffff7f90828000->0xffffff7f9086afff\n dependency: com.apple.driver.AppleMobileFileIntegrity(1.0.5)[0425E074-601A-3487-A54F-1E675D065186]@0xffffff7f8f587000\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.9)[3C56BB73-D149-3E84-A2EB-DF806779B96C]@0xffffff7f8f701000\n dependency: com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM(2.1)[4E64E519-CD9C-3D03-8E62-1074E9AD54A7]@0xffffff7f8f909000\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily(2.1)[E13E9C61-F1F5-3A81-B1EF-65669C3CBDBF]@0xffffff7f8f465000\n dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOReportFamily(47)[1FB49168-0280-3F04-A99A-F830C915E994]@0xffffff7f8f62f000\n\nBSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task\n\nMac OS version:\n19F96\n\nKernel version:\nDarwin Kernel Version 19.5.0: Thu Apr 30 18:25:59 PDT 2020; root:xnu-6153.121.1~7\/RELEASE_X86_64\nKernel UUID: 7B7F06EE-1B75-345E-B898-2FD4FEC20F0D\nKernel slide: 0x000000000e800000\nKernel text base: 0xffffff800ea00000\n__HIB text base: 0xffffff800e900000\nSystem model name: MacBookPro14,1 (Mac-B4831CEBD52A0C4C)\nSystem shutdown begun: NO\nPanic diags file available: YES (0x0)\n\nSystem uptime in nanoseconds: 2071062818664\nlast loaded kext at 13684997654: >AudioAUUC\t1.70 (addr 0xffffff7f923db000, size 28672)\nlast unloaded kext at 273612270881: >usb.!UHostPacketFilter\t1.0 (addr 0xffffff7f8fbfb000, size 24576)\nloaded kexts:\n>AudioAUUC\t1.70\n>!AGraphicsDevicePolicy\t5.2.4\n@AGDCPluginDisplayMetrics\t5.2.4\n@fileutil\t20.036.15\n>!AHV\t1\n|IOUserEthernet\t1.0.1\n|IO!BSerialManager\t7.0.5f6\n>AGPM\t111.4.4\n>X86PlatformShim\t1.0.0\n>!APlatformEnabler\t2.7.0d0\n>pmtelemetry\t1\n>!AUpstreamUserClient\t3.6.8\n>!AHDA\t283.15\n@Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X\t7.0.0\n>!A!IKBLGraphics\t14.0.6\n>!AThunderboltIP\t3.1.4\n>!ABacklight\t180.3\n>!A!IPCHPMC\t2.0.1\n>!ASMCLMU\t212\n>AirPort.BrcmNIC\t1400.1.1\n>eficheck\t1\n>!ACameraInterface\t7.6.0\n>!A!ISlowAdaptiveClocking\t4.0.0\n>!A!IKBLGraphicsFramebuffer\t14.0.6\n>!AMCCSControl\t1.14\n@filesystems.autofs\t3.0\n@filesystems.apfs\t1412.120.2\n>!AVirtIO\t1.0\n@filesystems.hfs.kext\t522.100.5\n@!AFSCompression.!AFSCompressionTypeDataless\t1.0.0d1\n@BootCache\t40\n@!AFSCompression.!AFSCompressionTypeZlib\t1.0.0\n>!ATopCaseHIDEventDriver\t3430.1\n@private.KextAudit\t1.0\n>!ASmartBatteryManager\t161.0.0\n>!AACPIButtons\t6.1\n>!ARTC\t2.0\n>!ASMBIOS\t2.1\n>!AACPIEC\t6.1\n>!AAPIC\t1.7\n$!AImage4\t1\n@nke.applicationfirewall\t303\n$TMSafetyNet\t8\n@!ASystemPolicy\t2.0.0\n|EndpointSecurity\t1\n>!AGraphicsControl\t5.2.4\n|IOAVB!F\t850.1\n>!ASSE\t1.0\n@plugin.IOgPTPPlugin\t840.3\n|IOEthernetAVB!C\t1.1.0\n>DspFuncLib\t283.15\n@kext.OSvKernDSPLib\t529\n>!AHDA!C\t283.15\n|IOHDA!F\t283.15\n@!AGPUWrangler\t5.2.4\n>!ABacklightExpert\t1.1.0\n|IONDRVSupport\t576.1\n|IO!BHost!CUARTTransport\t7.0.5f6\n|IO!BHost!CTransport\t7.0.5f6\n>!A!ILpssUARTv1\t3.0.60\n>!A!ILpssUARTCommon\t3.0.60\n>!AOnboardSerial\t1.0\n|IO80211!F\t1200.12.2b1\n>mDNSOffloadUserClient\t1.0.1b8\n>corecapture\t1.0.4\n|IOSkywalk!F\t1\n>X86PlatformPlugin\t1.0.0\n>IOPlatformPlugin!F\t6.0.0d8\n|IOSlowAdaptiveClocking!F\t1.0.0\n@!AGraphicsDeviceControl\t5.2.4\n|IOAccelerator!F2\t438.5.4\n>!ASMBus!C\t1.0.18d1\n|IOGraphics!F\t576.1\n@kext.triggers\t1.0\n|IOAudio!F\t300.2\n@vecLib.kext\t1.2.0\n|IOSerial!F\t11\n|IOSurface\t269.11\n@filesystems.hfs.encodings.kext\t1\n>!AActuatorDriver\t3440.1\n>!AHIDKeyboard\t209\n>!AHS!BDriver\t3430.1\n>IO!BHIDDriver\t7.0.5f6\n|IO!B!F\t7.0.5f6\n|IO!BPacketLogger\t7.0.5f6\n>!AMultitouchDriver\t3440.1\n>!AInputDeviceSupport\t3440.8\n>!AHSSPIHIDDriver\t59\n>!AThunderboltDPInAdapter\t6.2.6\n>!AThunderboltDPAdapter!F\t6.2.6\n>!AThunderboltPCIDownAdapter\t2.5.4\n>!AHPM\t3.4.4\n>!A!ILpssI2C!C\t3.0.60\n>!AHSSPISupport\t59\n>!AThunderboltNHI\t5.8.6\n|IOThunderbolt!F\t7.6.1\n>!A!ILpssSpi!C\t3.0.60\n>!A!ILpssDmac\t3.0.60\n|IONVMe!F\t2.1.0\n|IOUSB!F\t900.4.2\n>!A!ILpssI2C\t3.0.60\n>!A!ILpssGspi\t3.0.60\n>usb.!UXHCIPCI\t1.2\n>usb.!UXHCI\t1.2\n>!AEFINVRAM\t2.1\n>!AEFIRuntime\t2.1\n|IOSMBus!F\t1.1\n|IOHID!F\t2.0.0\n$quarantine\t4\n$sandbox\t300.0\n@kext.!AMatch\t1.0.0d1\n>DiskImages\t493.0.0\n>!AFDEKeyStore\t28.30\n>!AEffaceable!S\t1.0\n>!AKeyStore\t2\n>!UTDM\t489.120.1\n|IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice\t422.120.3\n>!ACredentialManager\t1.0\n>KernelRelayHost\t1\n>!ASEPManager\t1.0.1\n>IOSlaveProcessor\t1\n|IOTimeSync!F\t840.3\n|IONetworking!F\t3.4\n|IOUSBMass!SDriver\t157.121.1\n|IOSCSIArchitectureModel!F\t422.120.3\n|IO!S!F\t2.1\n|IOUSBHost!F\t1.2\n>!UHostMergeProperties\t1.2\n>usb.!UCommon\t1.0\n>!ABusPower!C\t1.0\n|CoreAnalytics!F\t1\n>!AMobileFileIntegrity\t1.0.5\n@kext.CoreTrust\t1\n|IOReport!F\t47\n>!AACPIPlatform\t6.1\n>!ASMC\t3.1.9\n>watchdog\t1\n|IOPCI!F\t2.9\n|IOACPI!F\t1.4\n@kec.pthread\t1\n@kec.Libm\t1\n@kec.corecrypto\t1.0\n\n\n"}
 
The Battery Health Management is not available on my 2014 MacBook Air.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.